Cargando…
Titanium interlayer-mediated hydroxyapatite-coated polyetheretherketone cage in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery
BACKGROUND: The variance in clinical responses to polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages with titanium (Ti) and hydroxyapatite (HA) coatings (PEEK-Ti-HA cages) is still not clear. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the radiographic and clinical outcomes of patients undergoing TLIF using PEEK-Ti-HA cages...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8561990/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34724952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04803-7 |
_version_ | 1784593179783200768 |
---|---|
author | Zhu, Ce He, Miaomiao Mao, Lili Yang, Huiliang Hu, Bowen Zhang, Li Feng, Ganjun Liu, Limin Song, Yueming |
author_facet | Zhu, Ce He, Miaomiao Mao, Lili Yang, Huiliang Hu, Bowen Zhang, Li Feng, Ganjun Liu, Limin Song, Yueming |
author_sort | Zhu, Ce |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The variance in clinical responses to polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages with titanium (Ti) and hydroxyapatite (HA) coatings (PEEK-Ti-HA cages) is still not clear. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the radiographic and clinical outcomes of patients undergoing TLIF using PEEK-Ti-HA cages with a particular focus on fusion rate. METHODS: A prospective and nonrandomized study was conducted to compare the outcomes of PEEK-Ti-HA cages (group A, n = 32) and uncoated PEEK cages (group B, n = 32). The follow up time was at least 2 years. The radiographic assessments included the regional lordosis (RL), disc height (DH), and fusion rate. The clinical indexes included the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores and visual analog scale (VAS) scores (back and leg). RESULTS: No significant differences were found in the pre- and postoperative RL and DH between Group A and Group B. And RL and DH, even if there were any variance initially, were restored not long after surgery in both groups. Though Group A had a significantly higher fusion rate than group B at 3 months post-surgery (93.7% vs. 75.0%), the fusion rates for the two groups reached the same level (100%) when it comes to the final follow-up. Additionally, differences of VAS and JOA scores for the two groups in general approximate. CONCLUSIONS: PEEK-Ti-HA cages, in contrast with uncoated PEEK cages, produced a better fusion rate at 3 months after single-level TLIF. The fusion rates of both groups could get 100% at the final follow-up. PEEK-Ti-HA cages could achieve similar RL, DH, JOA scores and VAS scores in comparison with uncoated PEEK cages post-surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8561990 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85619902021-11-03 Titanium interlayer-mediated hydroxyapatite-coated polyetheretherketone cage in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery Zhu, Ce He, Miaomiao Mao, Lili Yang, Huiliang Hu, Bowen Zhang, Li Feng, Ganjun Liu, Limin Song, Yueming BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: The variance in clinical responses to polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages with titanium (Ti) and hydroxyapatite (HA) coatings (PEEK-Ti-HA cages) is still not clear. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the radiographic and clinical outcomes of patients undergoing TLIF using PEEK-Ti-HA cages with a particular focus on fusion rate. METHODS: A prospective and nonrandomized study was conducted to compare the outcomes of PEEK-Ti-HA cages (group A, n = 32) and uncoated PEEK cages (group B, n = 32). The follow up time was at least 2 years. The radiographic assessments included the regional lordosis (RL), disc height (DH), and fusion rate. The clinical indexes included the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores and visual analog scale (VAS) scores (back and leg). RESULTS: No significant differences were found in the pre- and postoperative RL and DH between Group A and Group B. And RL and DH, even if there were any variance initially, were restored not long after surgery in both groups. Though Group A had a significantly higher fusion rate than group B at 3 months post-surgery (93.7% vs. 75.0%), the fusion rates for the two groups reached the same level (100%) when it comes to the final follow-up. Additionally, differences of VAS and JOA scores for the two groups in general approximate. CONCLUSIONS: PEEK-Ti-HA cages, in contrast with uncoated PEEK cages, produced a better fusion rate at 3 months after single-level TLIF. The fusion rates of both groups could get 100% at the final follow-up. PEEK-Ti-HA cages could achieve similar RL, DH, JOA scores and VAS scores in comparison with uncoated PEEK cages post-surgery. BioMed Central 2021-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8561990/ /pubmed/34724952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04803-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Zhu, Ce He, Miaomiao Mao, Lili Yang, Huiliang Hu, Bowen Zhang, Li Feng, Ganjun Liu, Limin Song, Yueming Titanium interlayer-mediated hydroxyapatite-coated polyetheretherketone cage in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery |
title | Titanium interlayer-mediated hydroxyapatite-coated polyetheretherketone cage in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery |
title_full | Titanium interlayer-mediated hydroxyapatite-coated polyetheretherketone cage in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery |
title_fullStr | Titanium interlayer-mediated hydroxyapatite-coated polyetheretherketone cage in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Titanium interlayer-mediated hydroxyapatite-coated polyetheretherketone cage in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery |
title_short | Titanium interlayer-mediated hydroxyapatite-coated polyetheretherketone cage in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery |
title_sort | titanium interlayer-mediated hydroxyapatite-coated polyetheretherketone cage in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8561990/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34724952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04803-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhuce titaniuminterlayermediatedhydroxyapatitecoatedpolyetheretherketonecageintransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionsurgery AT hemiaomiao titaniuminterlayermediatedhydroxyapatitecoatedpolyetheretherketonecageintransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionsurgery AT maolili titaniuminterlayermediatedhydroxyapatitecoatedpolyetheretherketonecageintransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionsurgery AT yanghuiliang titaniuminterlayermediatedhydroxyapatitecoatedpolyetheretherketonecageintransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionsurgery AT hubowen titaniuminterlayermediatedhydroxyapatitecoatedpolyetheretherketonecageintransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionsurgery AT zhangli titaniuminterlayermediatedhydroxyapatitecoatedpolyetheretherketonecageintransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionsurgery AT fengganjun titaniuminterlayermediatedhydroxyapatitecoatedpolyetheretherketonecageintransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionsurgery AT liulimin titaniuminterlayermediatedhydroxyapatitecoatedpolyetheretherketonecageintransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionsurgery AT songyueming titaniuminterlayermediatedhydroxyapatitecoatedpolyetheretherketonecageintransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionsurgery |