Cargando…

An anti-doping perspective on nicotine detection in the peri-exercise period in a cohort of trained male cyclists

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the detection of nicotine in athletes: before vs. after 90 min exercise, and in serum vs. urine. Serum [cotinine] was not different before vs. after exercise (31 ± 14 vs. 29 ± 14 ng mL(−1), P = 0.43), although urine [cotinine] measured greater than...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Mündel, Toby
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8562138/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34746814
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crphys.2020.04.001
Descripción
Sumario:The purpose of the present study was to investigate the detection of nicotine in athletes: before vs. after 90 min exercise, and in serum vs. urine. Serum [cotinine] was not different before vs. after exercise (31 ± 14 vs. 29 ± 14 ng mL(−1), P = 0.43), although urine [cotinine] measured greater than serum (148 ± 142 vs. 31 ± 14 ng mL(−1), P < 0.01). Urinary [nicotine] measured greater than [cotinine] (790 ± 1176 vs. 148 ± 128 ng mL(−1), P = 0.05), which significantly correlated (r = 0.57, P = 0.04). These results indicate that urine [cotinine] concentration is the optimal biomarker to detect nicotine use in athletes.