Cargando…

Effects of two different glycoprotein platelet IIb/IIIa inhibitors and the clinical endpoints in patients with intracranial Pipeline flow diverter implant

OBJECTIVE: To compare the antiplatelet effect and major adverse cerebrovascular events of Pipeline for intracranial aneurysms using glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists (GPI) eptifibatide and tirofiban. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of relevant data of patients using GPIs combined with oral antiplate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deng, Qiao, Zhang, Shichao, Li, Mingzhou, Zhang, Guozhong, Feng, Wenfeng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: KeAi Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8562166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34805930
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jimed.2020.08.005
_version_ 1784593205553004544
author Deng, Qiao
Zhang, Shichao
Li, Mingzhou
Zhang, Guozhong
Feng, Wenfeng
author_facet Deng, Qiao
Zhang, Shichao
Li, Mingzhou
Zhang, Guozhong
Feng, Wenfeng
author_sort Deng, Qiao
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the antiplatelet effect and major adverse cerebrovascular events of Pipeline for intracranial aneurysms using glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists (GPI) eptifibatide and tirofiban. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of relevant data of patients using GPIs combined with oral antiplatelet therapy in Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University from December 2017 to December 2019. The study was approved by the ethics Committee of Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University. According to the random use of GPIs drugs, they were assigned to the eptifibatide group and tirofiban group. Basic data, platelet inhibition rates at baseline, 24h and 72h after administration, short-term major adverse cerebrovascular events, and bleeding complications were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients were included in this study, including 24 patients in eptifibatide group and 23 patients in tirofiban group. There was no significant difference in average age (53.75 vs. 53.91 years) and body mass index (BMI) (24.39 vs. 22.73 ​kg/m2) between eptifibatide group and tirofiban group. There was no significant difference in coagulation factor function (R), fibrinogen function (K), fibrinolysis function (EPL), comprehensive coagulation index (Cl), arachidonic acid pathway inhibition rate (AA%) and adenosine diphosphate inhibition rate (ADP%). However, the baseline level of residual platelet function MA (ADP) in eptifibatide group was significantly higher than that in tirofiban group (50.79 vs. 35.29 ​mm, P ​= ​0.0026). There was a statistical difference in the platelet aggregation function MA (65.38 vs. 62.54 ​mm, p ​= ​0.0442), the rate of spontaneous hemorrhagic stroke (4.3% vs. 0%) and the rate of asymptomatic minor bleeding (26.08% vs. 4.1%) in the two groups (P ​< ​0.05). CONCLUSION: Both eptifibatide and tirofiban can effectively inhibit platelets, but the effect of etifeptide is better than that of tirofiban in preventing intracranial microhemorrhage and asymptomatic cerebral infarction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8562166
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher KeAi Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85621662021-11-19 Effects of two different glycoprotein platelet IIb/IIIa inhibitors and the clinical endpoints in patients with intracranial Pipeline flow diverter implant Deng, Qiao Zhang, Shichao Li, Mingzhou Zhang, Guozhong Feng, Wenfeng J Interv Med Article OBJECTIVE: To compare the antiplatelet effect and major adverse cerebrovascular events of Pipeline for intracranial aneurysms using glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists (GPI) eptifibatide and tirofiban. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of relevant data of patients using GPIs combined with oral antiplatelet therapy in Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University from December 2017 to December 2019. The study was approved by the ethics Committee of Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University. According to the random use of GPIs drugs, they were assigned to the eptifibatide group and tirofiban group. Basic data, platelet inhibition rates at baseline, 24h and 72h after administration, short-term major adverse cerebrovascular events, and bleeding complications were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients were included in this study, including 24 patients in eptifibatide group and 23 patients in tirofiban group. There was no significant difference in average age (53.75 vs. 53.91 years) and body mass index (BMI) (24.39 vs. 22.73 ​kg/m2) between eptifibatide group and tirofiban group. There was no significant difference in coagulation factor function (R), fibrinogen function (K), fibrinolysis function (EPL), comprehensive coagulation index (Cl), arachidonic acid pathway inhibition rate (AA%) and adenosine diphosphate inhibition rate (ADP%). However, the baseline level of residual platelet function MA (ADP) in eptifibatide group was significantly higher than that in tirofiban group (50.79 vs. 35.29 ​mm, P ​= ​0.0026). There was a statistical difference in the platelet aggregation function MA (65.38 vs. 62.54 ​mm, p ​= ​0.0442), the rate of spontaneous hemorrhagic stroke (4.3% vs. 0%) and the rate of asymptomatic minor bleeding (26.08% vs. 4.1%) in the two groups (P ​< ​0.05). CONCLUSION: Both eptifibatide and tirofiban can effectively inhibit platelets, but the effect of etifeptide is better than that of tirofiban in preventing intracranial microhemorrhage and asymptomatic cerebral infarction. KeAi Publishing 2020-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8562166/ /pubmed/34805930 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jimed.2020.08.005 Text en © 2020 Shanghai Journal of Interventional Medicine Press. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Deng, Qiao
Zhang, Shichao
Li, Mingzhou
Zhang, Guozhong
Feng, Wenfeng
Effects of two different glycoprotein platelet IIb/IIIa inhibitors and the clinical endpoints in patients with intracranial Pipeline flow diverter implant
title Effects of two different glycoprotein platelet IIb/IIIa inhibitors and the clinical endpoints in patients with intracranial Pipeline flow diverter implant
title_full Effects of two different glycoprotein platelet IIb/IIIa inhibitors and the clinical endpoints in patients with intracranial Pipeline flow diverter implant
title_fullStr Effects of two different glycoprotein platelet IIb/IIIa inhibitors and the clinical endpoints in patients with intracranial Pipeline flow diverter implant
title_full_unstemmed Effects of two different glycoprotein platelet IIb/IIIa inhibitors and the clinical endpoints in patients with intracranial Pipeline flow diverter implant
title_short Effects of two different glycoprotein platelet IIb/IIIa inhibitors and the clinical endpoints in patients with intracranial Pipeline flow diverter implant
title_sort effects of two different glycoprotein platelet iib/iiia inhibitors and the clinical endpoints in patients with intracranial pipeline flow diverter implant
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8562166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34805930
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jimed.2020.08.005
work_keys_str_mv AT dengqiao effectsoftwodifferentglycoproteinplateletiibiiiainhibitorsandtheclinicalendpointsinpatientswithintracranialpipelineflowdiverterimplant
AT zhangshichao effectsoftwodifferentglycoproteinplateletiibiiiainhibitorsandtheclinicalendpointsinpatientswithintracranialpipelineflowdiverterimplant
AT limingzhou effectsoftwodifferentglycoproteinplateletiibiiiainhibitorsandtheclinicalendpointsinpatientswithintracranialpipelineflowdiverterimplant
AT zhangguozhong effectsoftwodifferentglycoproteinplateletiibiiiainhibitorsandtheclinicalendpointsinpatientswithintracranialpipelineflowdiverterimplant
AT fengwenfeng effectsoftwodifferentglycoproteinplateletiibiiiainhibitorsandtheclinicalendpointsinpatientswithintracranialpipelineflowdiverterimplant