Cargando…

Prostate artery embolization for the treatment of urinary retention caused by large (>80 ​mL) benign prostatic hyperplasia: Results of 21 patients

OBJECTIVE: A large prostate size (>80 ​mL) of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is technically challenging to treat surgically. This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of super-selective prostatic artery embolization (PAE) for the treatment of urinary retention caused by large BP...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yuan, Bing, Wang, Yan, Wang, MaoQiang, Zhang, Jinlong, Yan, Jieyu, Yuan, Kai, Fu, Jinxin, Wang, Xiuqi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: KeAi Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8562217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34805925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jimed.2020.07.007
_version_ 1784593216903839744
author Yuan, Bing
Wang, Yan
Wang, MaoQiang
Zhang, Jinlong
Yan, Jieyu
Yuan, Kai
Fu, Jinxin
Wang, Xiuqi
author_facet Yuan, Bing
Wang, Yan
Wang, MaoQiang
Zhang, Jinlong
Yan, Jieyu
Yuan, Kai
Fu, Jinxin
Wang, Xiuqi
author_sort Yuan, Bing
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: A large prostate size (>80 ​mL) of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is technically challenging to treat surgically. This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of super-selective prostatic artery embolization (PAE) for the treatment of urinary retention caused by large BPH. METHODS: A total of 21 patients with urinary retention, indwelling urinary catheter, or suprapubic cystostomy as a consequence of giant BPH (prostate volume [PV] ​> ​80 ​mL) who sought treatment between January 2013 and December 2017 were enrolled. A microcatheter (1.9–2.7 Fr) and a “two-step embolization” combining 50-μm and 100-μm polyvinyl alcohol embolization particles were used in all patients. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), PV, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) were evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 months post-PAE. Clinical success was defined as removal of urinary catheter or suprapubic cystostomy and ability to void spontaneously. RESULTS: The clinical success rate was 95.2% (20/21). Compared with pre-procedural values, IPSS, QoL, PV, and PSA showed statistically significant differences at 3, 6, and 12 months post-PAE (P ​< ​0.05). There were no serious complications after PAE. CONCLUSIONS: PAE was safe and effective for the treatment of urinary retention caused by large BPH in patients without surgical treatment options.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8562217
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher KeAi Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85622172021-11-19 Prostate artery embolization for the treatment of urinary retention caused by large (>80 ​mL) benign prostatic hyperplasia: Results of 21 patients Yuan, Bing Wang, Yan Wang, MaoQiang Zhang, Jinlong Yan, Jieyu Yuan, Kai Fu, Jinxin Wang, Xiuqi J Interv Med Article OBJECTIVE: A large prostate size (>80 ​mL) of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is technically challenging to treat surgically. This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of super-selective prostatic artery embolization (PAE) for the treatment of urinary retention caused by large BPH. METHODS: A total of 21 patients with urinary retention, indwelling urinary catheter, or suprapubic cystostomy as a consequence of giant BPH (prostate volume [PV] ​> ​80 ​mL) who sought treatment between January 2013 and December 2017 were enrolled. A microcatheter (1.9–2.7 Fr) and a “two-step embolization” combining 50-μm and 100-μm polyvinyl alcohol embolization particles were used in all patients. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), PV, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) were evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 months post-PAE. Clinical success was defined as removal of urinary catheter or suprapubic cystostomy and ability to void spontaneously. RESULTS: The clinical success rate was 95.2% (20/21). Compared with pre-procedural values, IPSS, QoL, PV, and PSA showed statistically significant differences at 3, 6, and 12 months post-PAE (P ​< ​0.05). There were no serious complications after PAE. CONCLUSIONS: PAE was safe and effective for the treatment of urinary retention caused by large BPH in patients without surgical treatment options. KeAi Publishing 2020-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8562217/ /pubmed/34805925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jimed.2020.07.007 Text en © 2020 Shanghai Journal of Interventional Medicine Press. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Yuan, Bing
Wang, Yan
Wang, MaoQiang
Zhang, Jinlong
Yan, Jieyu
Yuan, Kai
Fu, Jinxin
Wang, Xiuqi
Prostate artery embolization for the treatment of urinary retention caused by large (>80 ​mL) benign prostatic hyperplasia: Results of 21 patients
title Prostate artery embolization for the treatment of urinary retention caused by large (>80 ​mL) benign prostatic hyperplasia: Results of 21 patients
title_full Prostate artery embolization for the treatment of urinary retention caused by large (>80 ​mL) benign prostatic hyperplasia: Results of 21 patients
title_fullStr Prostate artery embolization for the treatment of urinary retention caused by large (>80 ​mL) benign prostatic hyperplasia: Results of 21 patients
title_full_unstemmed Prostate artery embolization for the treatment of urinary retention caused by large (>80 ​mL) benign prostatic hyperplasia: Results of 21 patients
title_short Prostate artery embolization for the treatment of urinary retention caused by large (>80 ​mL) benign prostatic hyperplasia: Results of 21 patients
title_sort prostate artery embolization for the treatment of urinary retention caused by large (>80 ​ml) benign prostatic hyperplasia: results of 21 patients
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8562217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34805925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jimed.2020.07.007
work_keys_str_mv AT yuanbing prostatearteryembolizationforthetreatmentofurinaryretentioncausedbylarge80mlbenignprostatichyperplasiaresultsof21patients
AT wangyan prostatearteryembolizationforthetreatmentofurinaryretentioncausedbylarge80mlbenignprostatichyperplasiaresultsof21patients
AT wangmaoqiang prostatearteryembolizationforthetreatmentofurinaryretentioncausedbylarge80mlbenignprostatichyperplasiaresultsof21patients
AT zhangjinlong prostatearteryembolizationforthetreatmentofurinaryretentioncausedbylarge80mlbenignprostatichyperplasiaresultsof21patients
AT yanjieyu prostatearteryembolizationforthetreatmentofurinaryretentioncausedbylarge80mlbenignprostatichyperplasiaresultsof21patients
AT yuankai prostatearteryembolizationforthetreatmentofurinaryretentioncausedbylarge80mlbenignprostatichyperplasiaresultsof21patients
AT fujinxin prostatearteryembolizationforthetreatmentofurinaryretentioncausedbylarge80mlbenignprostatichyperplasiaresultsof21patients
AT wangxiuqi prostatearteryembolizationforthetreatmentofurinaryretentioncausedbylarge80mlbenignprostatichyperplasiaresultsof21patients