Cargando…
Prostate artery embolization for the treatment of urinary retention caused by large (>80 mL) benign prostatic hyperplasia: Results of 21 patients
OBJECTIVE: A large prostate size (>80 mL) of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is technically challenging to treat surgically. This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of super-selective prostatic artery embolization (PAE) for the treatment of urinary retention caused by large BP...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
KeAi Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8562217/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34805925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jimed.2020.07.007 |
_version_ | 1784593216903839744 |
---|---|
author | Yuan, Bing Wang, Yan Wang, MaoQiang Zhang, Jinlong Yan, Jieyu Yuan, Kai Fu, Jinxin Wang, Xiuqi |
author_facet | Yuan, Bing Wang, Yan Wang, MaoQiang Zhang, Jinlong Yan, Jieyu Yuan, Kai Fu, Jinxin Wang, Xiuqi |
author_sort | Yuan, Bing |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: A large prostate size (>80 mL) of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is technically challenging to treat surgically. This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of super-selective prostatic artery embolization (PAE) for the treatment of urinary retention caused by large BPH. METHODS: A total of 21 patients with urinary retention, indwelling urinary catheter, or suprapubic cystostomy as a consequence of giant BPH (prostate volume [PV] > 80 mL) who sought treatment between January 2013 and December 2017 were enrolled. A microcatheter (1.9–2.7 Fr) and a “two-step embolization” combining 50-μm and 100-μm polyvinyl alcohol embolization particles were used in all patients. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), PV, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) were evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 months post-PAE. Clinical success was defined as removal of urinary catheter or suprapubic cystostomy and ability to void spontaneously. RESULTS: The clinical success rate was 95.2% (20/21). Compared with pre-procedural values, IPSS, QoL, PV, and PSA showed statistically significant differences at 3, 6, and 12 months post-PAE (P < 0.05). There were no serious complications after PAE. CONCLUSIONS: PAE was safe and effective for the treatment of urinary retention caused by large BPH in patients without surgical treatment options. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8562217 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | KeAi Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85622172021-11-19 Prostate artery embolization for the treatment of urinary retention caused by large (>80 mL) benign prostatic hyperplasia: Results of 21 patients Yuan, Bing Wang, Yan Wang, MaoQiang Zhang, Jinlong Yan, Jieyu Yuan, Kai Fu, Jinxin Wang, Xiuqi J Interv Med Article OBJECTIVE: A large prostate size (>80 mL) of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is technically challenging to treat surgically. This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of super-selective prostatic artery embolization (PAE) for the treatment of urinary retention caused by large BPH. METHODS: A total of 21 patients with urinary retention, indwelling urinary catheter, or suprapubic cystostomy as a consequence of giant BPH (prostate volume [PV] > 80 mL) who sought treatment between January 2013 and December 2017 were enrolled. A microcatheter (1.9–2.7 Fr) and a “two-step embolization” combining 50-μm and 100-μm polyvinyl alcohol embolization particles were used in all patients. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), PV, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) were evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 months post-PAE. Clinical success was defined as removal of urinary catheter or suprapubic cystostomy and ability to void spontaneously. RESULTS: The clinical success rate was 95.2% (20/21). Compared with pre-procedural values, IPSS, QoL, PV, and PSA showed statistically significant differences at 3, 6, and 12 months post-PAE (P < 0.05). There were no serious complications after PAE. CONCLUSIONS: PAE was safe and effective for the treatment of urinary retention caused by large BPH in patients without surgical treatment options. KeAi Publishing 2020-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8562217/ /pubmed/34805925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jimed.2020.07.007 Text en © 2020 Shanghai Journal of Interventional Medicine Press. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Yuan, Bing Wang, Yan Wang, MaoQiang Zhang, Jinlong Yan, Jieyu Yuan, Kai Fu, Jinxin Wang, Xiuqi Prostate artery embolization for the treatment of urinary retention caused by large (>80 mL) benign prostatic hyperplasia: Results of 21 patients |
title | Prostate artery embolization for the treatment of urinary retention caused by large (>80 mL) benign prostatic hyperplasia: Results of 21 patients |
title_full | Prostate artery embolization for the treatment of urinary retention caused by large (>80 mL) benign prostatic hyperplasia: Results of 21 patients |
title_fullStr | Prostate artery embolization for the treatment of urinary retention caused by large (>80 mL) benign prostatic hyperplasia: Results of 21 patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Prostate artery embolization for the treatment of urinary retention caused by large (>80 mL) benign prostatic hyperplasia: Results of 21 patients |
title_short | Prostate artery embolization for the treatment of urinary retention caused by large (>80 mL) benign prostatic hyperplasia: Results of 21 patients |
title_sort | prostate artery embolization for the treatment of urinary retention caused by large (>80 ml) benign prostatic hyperplasia: results of 21 patients |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8562217/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34805925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jimed.2020.07.007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yuanbing prostatearteryembolizationforthetreatmentofurinaryretentioncausedbylarge80mlbenignprostatichyperplasiaresultsof21patients AT wangyan prostatearteryembolizationforthetreatmentofurinaryretentioncausedbylarge80mlbenignprostatichyperplasiaresultsof21patients AT wangmaoqiang prostatearteryembolizationforthetreatmentofurinaryretentioncausedbylarge80mlbenignprostatichyperplasiaresultsof21patients AT zhangjinlong prostatearteryembolizationforthetreatmentofurinaryretentioncausedbylarge80mlbenignprostatichyperplasiaresultsof21patients AT yanjieyu prostatearteryembolizationforthetreatmentofurinaryretentioncausedbylarge80mlbenignprostatichyperplasiaresultsof21patients AT yuankai prostatearteryembolizationforthetreatmentofurinaryretentioncausedbylarge80mlbenignprostatichyperplasiaresultsof21patients AT fujinxin prostatearteryembolizationforthetreatmentofurinaryretentioncausedbylarge80mlbenignprostatichyperplasiaresultsof21patients AT wangxiuqi prostatearteryembolizationforthetreatmentofurinaryretentioncausedbylarge80mlbenignprostatichyperplasiaresultsof21patients |