Cargando…

Midterm results of periprosthetic coiling embolization in high-risk patients

BACKGROUND: With increasing interest in the prevention of type II endoleaks (EII), the aim of this study was to report midterm results on the intraoperative coiling embolization of the periprosthetic aneurysmal sac in patients at high-risk of EII. METHODS: A retrospective review study was conducted...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Xiantao, Huang, Yanyan, Guo, Pingfan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: KeAi Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8562269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34805894
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jimed.2019.10.004
_version_ 1784593228735971328
author Li, Xiantao
Huang, Yanyan
Guo, Pingfan
author_facet Li, Xiantao
Huang, Yanyan
Guo, Pingfan
author_sort Li, Xiantao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: With increasing interest in the prevention of type II endoleaks (EII), the aim of this study was to report midterm results on the intraoperative coiling embolization of the periprosthetic aneurysmal sac in patients at high-risk of EII. METHODS: A retrospective review study was conducted with 124 patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm who accorded with the inclusion criteria, including 66 patients who underwent standard endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (Group A) and 58 patients who underwent aneurysmal sac coiling embolization (Group B). Baseline data and follow-up results were analyzed. RESULTS: A mean of 2.84 ± 1.45 coils (range 1–9) were used in Group B. The general incidence of an EII was 15.32% (19/124) at a mean follow-up time of 46.60 ± 15.14 months, with 22.7% (15/66) in Group A and 6.9% (4/58) in Group B (χ(2) = 5.62; P = 0.018). Logistic multivariate analysis revealed that the independent risk factors of an EII were no sac embolization and a sac volume ≥128 cm(3). The Kaplan-Meier subgroup analysis showed no difference in regard to the rate of freedom from EII between the two groups either with a larger or smaller sac. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that periprosthetic coiling embolization in patients at high-risk of EII is safe and effective in the prevention of EII. The preventive effect seemed to be weakened when the sac volumes were taken into consideration at midterm follow-up.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8562269
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher KeAi Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85622692021-11-19 Midterm results of periprosthetic coiling embolization in high-risk patients Li, Xiantao Huang, Yanyan Guo, Pingfan J Interv Med Article BACKGROUND: With increasing interest in the prevention of type II endoleaks (EII), the aim of this study was to report midterm results on the intraoperative coiling embolization of the periprosthetic aneurysmal sac in patients at high-risk of EII. METHODS: A retrospective review study was conducted with 124 patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm who accorded with the inclusion criteria, including 66 patients who underwent standard endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (Group A) and 58 patients who underwent aneurysmal sac coiling embolization (Group B). Baseline data and follow-up results were analyzed. RESULTS: A mean of 2.84 ± 1.45 coils (range 1–9) were used in Group B. The general incidence of an EII was 15.32% (19/124) at a mean follow-up time of 46.60 ± 15.14 months, with 22.7% (15/66) in Group A and 6.9% (4/58) in Group B (χ(2) = 5.62; P = 0.018). Logistic multivariate analysis revealed that the independent risk factors of an EII were no sac embolization and a sac volume ≥128 cm(3). The Kaplan-Meier subgroup analysis showed no difference in regard to the rate of freedom from EII between the two groups either with a larger or smaller sac. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that periprosthetic coiling embolization in patients at high-risk of EII is safe and effective in the prevention of EII. The preventive effect seemed to be weakened when the sac volumes were taken into consideration at midterm follow-up. KeAi Publishing 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8562269/ /pubmed/34805894 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jimed.2019.10.004 Text en © 2019 Shanghai Journal of Interventional Medicine Press. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Li, Xiantao
Huang, Yanyan
Guo, Pingfan
Midterm results of periprosthetic coiling embolization in high-risk patients
title Midterm results of periprosthetic coiling embolization in high-risk patients
title_full Midterm results of periprosthetic coiling embolization in high-risk patients
title_fullStr Midterm results of periprosthetic coiling embolization in high-risk patients
title_full_unstemmed Midterm results of periprosthetic coiling embolization in high-risk patients
title_short Midterm results of periprosthetic coiling embolization in high-risk patients
title_sort midterm results of periprosthetic coiling embolization in high-risk patients
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8562269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34805894
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jimed.2019.10.004
work_keys_str_mv AT lixiantao midtermresultsofperiprostheticcoilingembolizationinhighriskpatients
AT huangyanyan midtermresultsofperiprostheticcoilingembolizationinhighriskpatients
AT guopingfan midtermresultsofperiprostheticcoilingembolizationinhighriskpatients