Cargando…

Effectiveness and safety of irreversible electroporation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma ineligible for thermal ablation after surgery

OBJECTIVES: To preliminarily evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of computed tomography (CT) image-guided irreversible electroporation (IRE) for the treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after surgical resection. METHODS: From January 2016 to February 2018, 18 patients dia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Weidong, Hou, Sinan, Ni, JiaYan, Sun, Hongliang, Jiang, Xiongying, Chen, Yaoting, Xu, Linfeng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: KeAi Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8562272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34805927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jimed.2020.07.009
_version_ 1784593229475217408
author Wang, Weidong
Hou, Sinan
Ni, JiaYan
Sun, Hongliang
Jiang, Xiongying
Chen, Yaoting
Xu, Linfeng
author_facet Wang, Weidong
Hou, Sinan
Ni, JiaYan
Sun, Hongliang
Jiang, Xiongying
Chen, Yaoting
Xu, Linfeng
author_sort Wang, Weidong
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To preliminarily evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of computed tomography (CT) image-guided irreversible electroporation (IRE) for the treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after surgical resection. METHODS: From January 2016 to February 2018, 18 patients diagnosed with recurrent HCC after surgical resection received IRE under CT image guidance for 22 tumors. Patients were enrolled for IRE when ineligible for thermal ablation due to tumor location. Clinical records and imaging data were reviewed to assess complete ablation rate, local tumor progression free rate (LTPFR), local tumor progression free survival (LTPFS) and complications after a median follow-up time of 14 months. RESULTS: Successful complete ablations were achieved in 20/22 (90.1%) tumors. Mean LTPFS was 10.5 ​± ​9.4 months. Overall 3-, 6- and 12-months LTPFR in 22 tumors following IRE were 68.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 45%–83%), 59.1% (95% CI: 33%–76%) and 36.4% (95% CI: 17%–56%), respectively. Complications included pneumothorax (2/18, 11.1%), localized pain (3/18, 16.7%), bile duct dilation (1/18, 5.6%) and transient hypertension (1/18, 5.6%). No major complications or treatment-related deaths were observed. The alpha-fetoprotein levels of two patients decreased to the normal range at 3 and 4 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that percutaneous CT image-guided IRE can serve as a safe and effective treatment for recurrent HCC not suitable for thermal ablation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8562272
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher KeAi Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85622722021-11-19 Effectiveness and safety of irreversible electroporation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma ineligible for thermal ablation after surgery Wang, Weidong Hou, Sinan Ni, JiaYan Sun, Hongliang Jiang, Xiongying Chen, Yaoting Xu, Linfeng J Interv Med Article OBJECTIVES: To preliminarily evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of computed tomography (CT) image-guided irreversible electroporation (IRE) for the treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after surgical resection. METHODS: From January 2016 to February 2018, 18 patients diagnosed with recurrent HCC after surgical resection received IRE under CT image guidance for 22 tumors. Patients were enrolled for IRE when ineligible for thermal ablation due to tumor location. Clinical records and imaging data were reviewed to assess complete ablation rate, local tumor progression free rate (LTPFR), local tumor progression free survival (LTPFS) and complications after a median follow-up time of 14 months. RESULTS: Successful complete ablations were achieved in 20/22 (90.1%) tumors. Mean LTPFS was 10.5 ​± ​9.4 months. Overall 3-, 6- and 12-months LTPFR in 22 tumors following IRE were 68.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 45%–83%), 59.1% (95% CI: 33%–76%) and 36.4% (95% CI: 17%–56%), respectively. Complications included pneumothorax (2/18, 11.1%), localized pain (3/18, 16.7%), bile duct dilation (1/18, 5.6%) and transient hypertension (1/18, 5.6%). No major complications or treatment-related deaths were observed. The alpha-fetoprotein levels of two patients decreased to the normal range at 3 and 4 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that percutaneous CT image-guided IRE can serve as a safe and effective treatment for recurrent HCC not suitable for thermal ablation. KeAi Publishing 2020-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8562272/ /pubmed/34805927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jimed.2020.07.009 Text en © 2020 Shanghai Journal of Interventional Medicine Press. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wang, Weidong
Hou, Sinan
Ni, JiaYan
Sun, Hongliang
Jiang, Xiongying
Chen, Yaoting
Xu, Linfeng
Effectiveness and safety of irreversible electroporation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma ineligible for thermal ablation after surgery
title Effectiveness and safety of irreversible electroporation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma ineligible for thermal ablation after surgery
title_full Effectiveness and safety of irreversible electroporation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma ineligible for thermal ablation after surgery
title_fullStr Effectiveness and safety of irreversible electroporation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma ineligible for thermal ablation after surgery
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness and safety of irreversible electroporation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma ineligible for thermal ablation after surgery
title_short Effectiveness and safety of irreversible electroporation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma ineligible for thermal ablation after surgery
title_sort effectiveness and safety of irreversible electroporation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma ineligible for thermal ablation after surgery
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8562272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34805927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jimed.2020.07.009
work_keys_str_mv AT wangweidong effectivenessandsafetyofirreversibleelectroporationforrecurrenthepatocellularcarcinomaineligibleforthermalablationaftersurgery
AT housinan effectivenessandsafetyofirreversibleelectroporationforrecurrenthepatocellularcarcinomaineligibleforthermalablationaftersurgery
AT nijiayan effectivenessandsafetyofirreversibleelectroporationforrecurrenthepatocellularcarcinomaineligibleforthermalablationaftersurgery
AT sunhongliang effectivenessandsafetyofirreversibleelectroporationforrecurrenthepatocellularcarcinomaineligibleforthermalablationaftersurgery
AT jiangxiongying effectivenessandsafetyofirreversibleelectroporationforrecurrenthepatocellularcarcinomaineligibleforthermalablationaftersurgery
AT chenyaoting effectivenessandsafetyofirreversibleelectroporationforrecurrenthepatocellularcarcinomaineligibleforthermalablationaftersurgery
AT xulinfeng effectivenessandsafetyofirreversibleelectroporationforrecurrenthepatocellularcarcinomaineligibleforthermalablationaftersurgery