Cargando…

Outcomes reported in randomised controlled trials of major depressive disorder in older adults: protocol for a methodological review

INTRODUCTION: Major depressive disorder (MDD or depression) is prevalent among adults aged 65 years and older. The effectiveness and safety of interventions used to treat depression is often assessed through randomised controlled trials (RCTs). However, heterogeneity in the selection, measurement an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rodrigues, Myanca, Sanger, Nitika, Dufort, Alexander, Sanger, Stephanie, Panesar, Balpreet, D'Elia, Alessia, Parpia, Sameer, Samaan, Zainab, Thabane, Lehana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8562520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34725082
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054777
_version_ 1784593274505265152
author Rodrigues, Myanca
Sanger, Nitika
Dufort, Alexander
Sanger, Stephanie
Panesar, Balpreet
D'Elia, Alessia
Parpia, Sameer
Samaan, Zainab
Thabane, Lehana
author_facet Rodrigues, Myanca
Sanger, Nitika
Dufort, Alexander
Sanger, Stephanie
Panesar, Balpreet
D'Elia, Alessia
Parpia, Sameer
Samaan, Zainab
Thabane, Lehana
author_sort Rodrigues, Myanca
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Major depressive disorder (MDD or depression) is prevalent among adults aged 65 years and older. The effectiveness and safety of interventions used to treat depression is often assessed through randomised controlled trials (RCTs). However, heterogeneity in the selection, measurement and reporting of outcomes in RCTs renders comparisons between trial results, interpretability and generalisability of findings challenging. There is presently no core outcome set (COS) for use in RCTs that assess interventions for older adults with MDD. We will conduct a methodological review of the literature for outcomes reported in trials for adults 65 years and older with depression to assess the heterogeneity of outcome measures. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: RCTs evaluating pharmacotherapy, psychotherapy, or any other treatment intervention for older adults with MDD published in the last 10 years will be located using electronic database searches (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials). Reviewers will conduct title and abstract screening, full-text screening and data extraction of trials eligible for inclusion independently and in duplicate. Outcomes will be synthesised and mapped to core outcome-domain frameworks. We will summarise characteristics associated with trials and outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: We hope that findings from our methodological review will reduce variability in outcome selection, measurement and reporting and facilitate the development of a COS for older adults with MDD. Our review will also inform evidence synthesis efforts in identifying the best treatment practices for this clinical population. Ethics approval is not required, as this study is a literature review. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021244753.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8562520
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85625202021-11-15 Outcomes reported in randomised controlled trials of major depressive disorder in older adults: protocol for a methodological review Rodrigues, Myanca Sanger, Nitika Dufort, Alexander Sanger, Stephanie Panesar, Balpreet D'Elia, Alessia Parpia, Sameer Samaan, Zainab Thabane, Lehana BMJ Open Mental Health INTRODUCTION: Major depressive disorder (MDD or depression) is prevalent among adults aged 65 years and older. The effectiveness and safety of interventions used to treat depression is often assessed through randomised controlled trials (RCTs). However, heterogeneity in the selection, measurement and reporting of outcomes in RCTs renders comparisons between trial results, interpretability and generalisability of findings challenging. There is presently no core outcome set (COS) for use in RCTs that assess interventions for older adults with MDD. We will conduct a methodological review of the literature for outcomes reported in trials for adults 65 years and older with depression to assess the heterogeneity of outcome measures. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: RCTs evaluating pharmacotherapy, psychotherapy, or any other treatment intervention for older adults with MDD published in the last 10 years will be located using electronic database searches (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials). Reviewers will conduct title and abstract screening, full-text screening and data extraction of trials eligible for inclusion independently and in duplicate. Outcomes will be synthesised and mapped to core outcome-domain frameworks. We will summarise characteristics associated with trials and outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: We hope that findings from our methodological review will reduce variability in outcome selection, measurement and reporting and facilitate the development of a COS for older adults with MDD. Our review will also inform evidence synthesis efforts in identifying the best treatment practices for this clinical population. Ethics approval is not required, as this study is a literature review. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021244753. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8562520/ /pubmed/34725082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054777 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Mental Health
Rodrigues, Myanca
Sanger, Nitika
Dufort, Alexander
Sanger, Stephanie
Panesar, Balpreet
D'Elia, Alessia
Parpia, Sameer
Samaan, Zainab
Thabane, Lehana
Outcomes reported in randomised controlled trials of major depressive disorder in older adults: protocol for a methodological review
title Outcomes reported in randomised controlled trials of major depressive disorder in older adults: protocol for a methodological review
title_full Outcomes reported in randomised controlled trials of major depressive disorder in older adults: protocol for a methodological review
title_fullStr Outcomes reported in randomised controlled trials of major depressive disorder in older adults: protocol for a methodological review
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes reported in randomised controlled trials of major depressive disorder in older adults: protocol for a methodological review
title_short Outcomes reported in randomised controlled trials of major depressive disorder in older adults: protocol for a methodological review
title_sort outcomes reported in randomised controlled trials of major depressive disorder in older adults: protocol for a methodological review
topic Mental Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8562520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34725082
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054777
work_keys_str_mv AT rodriguesmyanca outcomesreportedinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsofmajordepressivedisorderinolderadultsprotocolforamethodologicalreview
AT sangernitika outcomesreportedinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsofmajordepressivedisorderinolderadultsprotocolforamethodologicalreview
AT dufortalexander outcomesreportedinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsofmajordepressivedisorderinolderadultsprotocolforamethodologicalreview
AT sangerstephanie outcomesreportedinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsofmajordepressivedisorderinolderadultsprotocolforamethodologicalreview
AT panesarbalpreet outcomesreportedinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsofmajordepressivedisorderinolderadultsprotocolforamethodologicalreview
AT deliaalessia outcomesreportedinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsofmajordepressivedisorderinolderadultsprotocolforamethodologicalreview
AT parpiasameer outcomesreportedinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsofmajordepressivedisorderinolderadultsprotocolforamethodologicalreview
AT samaanzainab outcomesreportedinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsofmajordepressivedisorderinolderadultsprotocolforamethodologicalreview
AT thabanelehana outcomesreportedinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsofmajordepressivedisorderinolderadultsprotocolforamethodologicalreview