Cargando…
Inflated Co-authorship Introduces Bias to Current Scientometric Indices
BACKGROUND: Although scientometry gradually became prevalent way of measuring one’s research output, there are many inherent drawbacks in main indices that are used: impact factor, number of citations, number of published papers and Hirsch’s index. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze eff...
Autores principales: | Masic, Izet, Jankovic, Slobodan M. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Academy of Medical Sciences of Bosnia and Herzegovina
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8563053/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34759443 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2021.75.248-255 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Missues of Authorship - Editors View
por: Masic, Izet
Publicado: (2017) -
The Malversations of Authorship - Current Status in Academic Community and How to Prevent It
por: Masic, Izet
Publicado: (2018) -
Scientometric Dilemma: Is H-index Adequate for Scientific Validity of Academic’s Work?
por: Masic, Izet, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Medical publication and scientometrics
por: Masic, Izet
Publicado: (2013) -
Operation of Medical Journal Citation Databases Without Control. Dilemma: Are They What They Want to Be in the Eyes of Scientific Community
por: Masic, Izet, et al.
Publicado: (2022)