Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of apatinib alone or apatinib plus paclitaxel/docetaxel versus paclitaxel/docetaxel in the treatment of advanced non‐small cell lung cancer: A meta‐analysis
BACKGROUND: To investigate the efficacy and safety of apatinib alone or apatinib plus paclitaxel/docetaxel versus paclitaxel/docetaxel in the treatment of advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) through pooling of open published data. METHODS: The electronic databases of Medline (1960–2021.5), C...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8563161/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34622571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.14131 |
_version_ | 1784593376924925952 |
---|---|
author | Li, Zhe Liu, Zhibao Wu, Yuanyuan Li, Huarui Sun, Zhen Han, Chenggang Zhang, Xiaoling Zhang, Jinghua |
author_facet | Li, Zhe Liu, Zhibao Wu, Yuanyuan Li, Huarui Sun, Zhen Han, Chenggang Zhang, Xiaoling Zhang, Jinghua |
author_sort | Li, Zhe |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To investigate the efficacy and safety of apatinib alone or apatinib plus paclitaxel/docetaxel versus paclitaxel/docetaxel in the treatment of advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) through pooling of open published data. METHODS: The electronic databases of Medline (1960–2021.5), Cochrane central register of controlled trials (CENTRAL), EMBASE(1980–2021.5) and Wan fang (1986–2021.5) were systematically searched by two reviewers to identify the relevant clinical trials related to the above subject. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and drug relevant adverse reactions were pooled and demonstrated by risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). The statistical heterogeneity across studies was assessed by I‐square test. The publication bias was evaluated by Egger's line regression test and demonstrated by Begg's funnel plot. RESULTS: Eleven prospective studies were included in the meta‐analysis. The pooled results indicated that the ORR (RR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.32–2.00, p < 0.05) and DCR (RR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.18–1.41, p < 0.05) of apatinib alone or apatinib plus paclitaxel/docetaxel was significantly higher than that of the paclitaxel/docetaxel group for advanced NSCLC, respectively. The drug‐related adverse reaction was not statistically different between apatinib alone or apatinib plus paclitaxel/docetaxel with regard to the hand‐foot syndrome, gastrointestinal reaction, thrombocytopenia, anemia and leukocytopenia (p (all) > 0.05) except for hypertension (RR = 3.60, 95% CI: 1.26–10.31, p < 0.05). Subgroup analysis also indicated that the hypertension and hand‐foot syndrome in apatinib + paclitaxel/docetaxel were higher than that of the paclitaxel/docetaxel group with a statistical difference (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Apatinib alone or apatinib plus paclitaxel/docetaxel was superior to paclitaxel/docetaxel for ORR and DCR. However, combined treatment with apatinib appears to increase the risk of a patient developing an adverse reaction, especially hypertension and hand‐foot syndrome. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8563161 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85631612021-11-08 Efficacy and safety of apatinib alone or apatinib plus paclitaxel/docetaxel versus paclitaxel/docetaxel in the treatment of advanced non‐small cell lung cancer: A meta‐analysis Li, Zhe Liu, Zhibao Wu, Yuanyuan Li, Huarui Sun, Zhen Han, Chenggang Zhang, Xiaoling Zhang, Jinghua Thorac Cancer Original Articles BACKGROUND: To investigate the efficacy and safety of apatinib alone or apatinib plus paclitaxel/docetaxel versus paclitaxel/docetaxel in the treatment of advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) through pooling of open published data. METHODS: The electronic databases of Medline (1960–2021.5), Cochrane central register of controlled trials (CENTRAL), EMBASE(1980–2021.5) and Wan fang (1986–2021.5) were systematically searched by two reviewers to identify the relevant clinical trials related to the above subject. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and drug relevant adverse reactions were pooled and demonstrated by risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). The statistical heterogeneity across studies was assessed by I‐square test. The publication bias was evaluated by Egger's line regression test and demonstrated by Begg's funnel plot. RESULTS: Eleven prospective studies were included in the meta‐analysis. The pooled results indicated that the ORR (RR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.32–2.00, p < 0.05) and DCR (RR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.18–1.41, p < 0.05) of apatinib alone or apatinib plus paclitaxel/docetaxel was significantly higher than that of the paclitaxel/docetaxel group for advanced NSCLC, respectively. The drug‐related adverse reaction was not statistically different between apatinib alone or apatinib plus paclitaxel/docetaxel with regard to the hand‐foot syndrome, gastrointestinal reaction, thrombocytopenia, anemia and leukocytopenia (p (all) > 0.05) except for hypertension (RR = 3.60, 95% CI: 1.26–10.31, p < 0.05). Subgroup analysis also indicated that the hypertension and hand‐foot syndrome in apatinib + paclitaxel/docetaxel were higher than that of the paclitaxel/docetaxel group with a statistical difference (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Apatinib alone or apatinib plus paclitaxel/docetaxel was superior to paclitaxel/docetaxel for ORR and DCR. However, combined treatment with apatinib appears to increase the risk of a patient developing an adverse reaction, especially hypertension and hand‐foot syndrome. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2021-10-07 2021-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8563161/ /pubmed/34622571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.14131 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Li, Zhe Liu, Zhibao Wu, Yuanyuan Li, Huarui Sun, Zhen Han, Chenggang Zhang, Xiaoling Zhang, Jinghua Efficacy and safety of apatinib alone or apatinib plus paclitaxel/docetaxel versus paclitaxel/docetaxel in the treatment of advanced non‐small cell lung cancer: A meta‐analysis |
title | Efficacy and safety of apatinib alone or apatinib plus paclitaxel/docetaxel versus paclitaxel/docetaxel in the treatment of advanced non‐small cell lung cancer: A meta‐analysis |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of apatinib alone or apatinib plus paclitaxel/docetaxel versus paclitaxel/docetaxel in the treatment of advanced non‐small cell lung cancer: A meta‐analysis |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of apatinib alone or apatinib plus paclitaxel/docetaxel versus paclitaxel/docetaxel in the treatment of advanced non‐small cell lung cancer: A meta‐analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of apatinib alone or apatinib plus paclitaxel/docetaxel versus paclitaxel/docetaxel in the treatment of advanced non‐small cell lung cancer: A meta‐analysis |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of apatinib alone or apatinib plus paclitaxel/docetaxel versus paclitaxel/docetaxel in the treatment of advanced non‐small cell lung cancer: A meta‐analysis |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of apatinib alone or apatinib plus paclitaxel/docetaxel versus paclitaxel/docetaxel in the treatment of advanced non‐small cell lung cancer: a meta‐analysis |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8563161/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34622571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.14131 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lizhe efficacyandsafetyofapatinibaloneorapatinibpluspaclitaxeldocetaxelversuspaclitaxeldocetaxelinthetreatmentofadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerametaanalysis AT liuzhibao efficacyandsafetyofapatinibaloneorapatinibpluspaclitaxeldocetaxelversuspaclitaxeldocetaxelinthetreatmentofadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerametaanalysis AT wuyuanyuan efficacyandsafetyofapatinibaloneorapatinibpluspaclitaxeldocetaxelversuspaclitaxeldocetaxelinthetreatmentofadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerametaanalysis AT lihuarui efficacyandsafetyofapatinibaloneorapatinibpluspaclitaxeldocetaxelversuspaclitaxeldocetaxelinthetreatmentofadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerametaanalysis AT sunzhen efficacyandsafetyofapatinibaloneorapatinibpluspaclitaxeldocetaxelversuspaclitaxeldocetaxelinthetreatmentofadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerametaanalysis AT hanchenggang efficacyandsafetyofapatinibaloneorapatinibpluspaclitaxeldocetaxelversuspaclitaxeldocetaxelinthetreatmentofadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerametaanalysis AT zhangxiaoling efficacyandsafetyofapatinibaloneorapatinibpluspaclitaxeldocetaxelversuspaclitaxeldocetaxelinthetreatmentofadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerametaanalysis AT zhangjinghua efficacyandsafetyofapatinibaloneorapatinibpluspaclitaxeldocetaxelversuspaclitaxeldocetaxelinthetreatmentofadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerametaanalysis |