Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of apatinib alone or apatinib plus paclitaxel/docetaxel versus paclitaxel/docetaxel in the treatment of advanced non‐small cell lung cancer: A meta‐analysis

BACKGROUND: To investigate the efficacy and safety of apatinib alone or apatinib plus paclitaxel/docetaxel versus paclitaxel/docetaxel in the treatment of advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) through pooling of open published data. METHODS: The electronic databases of Medline (1960–2021.5), C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Zhe, Liu, Zhibao, Wu, Yuanyuan, Li, Huarui, Sun, Zhen, Han, Chenggang, Zhang, Xiaoling, Zhang, Jinghua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8563161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34622571
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.14131
_version_ 1784593376924925952
author Li, Zhe
Liu, Zhibao
Wu, Yuanyuan
Li, Huarui
Sun, Zhen
Han, Chenggang
Zhang, Xiaoling
Zhang, Jinghua
author_facet Li, Zhe
Liu, Zhibao
Wu, Yuanyuan
Li, Huarui
Sun, Zhen
Han, Chenggang
Zhang, Xiaoling
Zhang, Jinghua
author_sort Li, Zhe
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To investigate the efficacy and safety of apatinib alone or apatinib plus paclitaxel/docetaxel versus paclitaxel/docetaxel in the treatment of advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) through pooling of open published data. METHODS: The electronic databases of Medline (1960–2021.5), Cochrane central register of controlled trials (CENTRAL), EMBASE(1980–2021.5) and Wan fang (1986–2021.5) were systematically searched by two reviewers to identify the relevant clinical trials related to the above subject. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and drug relevant adverse reactions were pooled and demonstrated by risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). The statistical heterogeneity across studies was assessed by I‐square test. The publication bias was evaluated by Egger's line regression test and demonstrated by Begg's funnel plot. RESULTS: Eleven prospective studies were included in the meta‐analysis. The pooled results indicated that the ORR (RR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.32–2.00, p < 0.05) and DCR (RR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.18–1.41, p < 0.05) of apatinib alone or apatinib plus paclitaxel/docetaxel was significantly higher than that of the paclitaxel/docetaxel group for advanced NSCLC, respectively. The drug‐related adverse reaction was not statistically different between apatinib alone or apatinib plus paclitaxel/docetaxel with regard to the hand‐foot syndrome, gastrointestinal reaction, thrombocytopenia, anemia and leukocytopenia (p (all) > 0.05) except for hypertension (RR = 3.60, 95% CI: 1.26–10.31, p < 0.05). Subgroup analysis also indicated that the hypertension and hand‐foot syndrome in apatinib + paclitaxel/docetaxel were higher than that of the paclitaxel/docetaxel group with a statistical difference (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Apatinib alone or apatinib plus paclitaxel/docetaxel was superior to paclitaxel/docetaxel for ORR and DCR. However, combined treatment with apatinib appears to increase the risk of a patient developing an adverse reaction, especially hypertension and hand‐foot syndrome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8563161
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85631612021-11-08 Efficacy and safety of apatinib alone or apatinib plus paclitaxel/docetaxel versus paclitaxel/docetaxel in the treatment of advanced non‐small cell lung cancer: A meta‐analysis Li, Zhe Liu, Zhibao Wu, Yuanyuan Li, Huarui Sun, Zhen Han, Chenggang Zhang, Xiaoling Zhang, Jinghua Thorac Cancer Original Articles BACKGROUND: To investigate the efficacy and safety of apatinib alone or apatinib plus paclitaxel/docetaxel versus paclitaxel/docetaxel in the treatment of advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) through pooling of open published data. METHODS: The electronic databases of Medline (1960–2021.5), Cochrane central register of controlled trials (CENTRAL), EMBASE(1980–2021.5) and Wan fang (1986–2021.5) were systematically searched by two reviewers to identify the relevant clinical trials related to the above subject. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and drug relevant adverse reactions were pooled and demonstrated by risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). The statistical heterogeneity across studies was assessed by I‐square test. The publication bias was evaluated by Egger's line regression test and demonstrated by Begg's funnel plot. RESULTS: Eleven prospective studies were included in the meta‐analysis. The pooled results indicated that the ORR (RR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.32–2.00, p < 0.05) and DCR (RR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.18–1.41, p < 0.05) of apatinib alone or apatinib plus paclitaxel/docetaxel was significantly higher than that of the paclitaxel/docetaxel group for advanced NSCLC, respectively. The drug‐related adverse reaction was not statistically different between apatinib alone or apatinib plus paclitaxel/docetaxel with regard to the hand‐foot syndrome, gastrointestinal reaction, thrombocytopenia, anemia and leukocytopenia (p (all) > 0.05) except for hypertension (RR = 3.60, 95% CI: 1.26–10.31, p < 0.05). Subgroup analysis also indicated that the hypertension and hand‐foot syndrome in apatinib + paclitaxel/docetaxel were higher than that of the paclitaxel/docetaxel group with a statistical difference (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Apatinib alone or apatinib plus paclitaxel/docetaxel was superior to paclitaxel/docetaxel for ORR and DCR. However, combined treatment with apatinib appears to increase the risk of a patient developing an adverse reaction, especially hypertension and hand‐foot syndrome. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2021-10-07 2021-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8563161/ /pubmed/34622571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.14131 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Li, Zhe
Liu, Zhibao
Wu, Yuanyuan
Li, Huarui
Sun, Zhen
Han, Chenggang
Zhang, Xiaoling
Zhang, Jinghua
Efficacy and safety of apatinib alone or apatinib plus paclitaxel/docetaxel versus paclitaxel/docetaxel in the treatment of advanced non‐small cell lung cancer: A meta‐analysis
title Efficacy and safety of apatinib alone or apatinib plus paclitaxel/docetaxel versus paclitaxel/docetaxel in the treatment of advanced non‐small cell lung cancer: A meta‐analysis
title_full Efficacy and safety of apatinib alone or apatinib plus paclitaxel/docetaxel versus paclitaxel/docetaxel in the treatment of advanced non‐small cell lung cancer: A meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of apatinib alone or apatinib plus paclitaxel/docetaxel versus paclitaxel/docetaxel in the treatment of advanced non‐small cell lung cancer: A meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of apatinib alone or apatinib plus paclitaxel/docetaxel versus paclitaxel/docetaxel in the treatment of advanced non‐small cell lung cancer: A meta‐analysis
title_short Efficacy and safety of apatinib alone or apatinib plus paclitaxel/docetaxel versus paclitaxel/docetaxel in the treatment of advanced non‐small cell lung cancer: A meta‐analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of apatinib alone or apatinib plus paclitaxel/docetaxel versus paclitaxel/docetaxel in the treatment of advanced non‐small cell lung cancer: a meta‐analysis
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8563161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34622571
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.14131
work_keys_str_mv AT lizhe efficacyandsafetyofapatinibaloneorapatinibpluspaclitaxeldocetaxelversuspaclitaxeldocetaxelinthetreatmentofadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerametaanalysis
AT liuzhibao efficacyandsafetyofapatinibaloneorapatinibpluspaclitaxeldocetaxelversuspaclitaxeldocetaxelinthetreatmentofadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerametaanalysis
AT wuyuanyuan efficacyandsafetyofapatinibaloneorapatinibpluspaclitaxeldocetaxelversuspaclitaxeldocetaxelinthetreatmentofadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerametaanalysis
AT lihuarui efficacyandsafetyofapatinibaloneorapatinibpluspaclitaxeldocetaxelversuspaclitaxeldocetaxelinthetreatmentofadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerametaanalysis
AT sunzhen efficacyandsafetyofapatinibaloneorapatinibpluspaclitaxeldocetaxelversuspaclitaxeldocetaxelinthetreatmentofadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerametaanalysis
AT hanchenggang efficacyandsafetyofapatinibaloneorapatinibpluspaclitaxeldocetaxelversuspaclitaxeldocetaxelinthetreatmentofadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerametaanalysis
AT zhangxiaoling efficacyandsafetyofapatinibaloneorapatinibpluspaclitaxeldocetaxelversuspaclitaxeldocetaxelinthetreatmentofadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerametaanalysis
AT zhangjinghua efficacyandsafetyofapatinibaloneorapatinibpluspaclitaxeldocetaxelversuspaclitaxeldocetaxelinthetreatmentofadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerametaanalysis