Cargando…

Patient-Reported Experience and Outcome Measures in People Living with Diabetes: A Scoping Review of Instruments

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus is a global public health concern, with over 463 million people living with this chronic disease. Pathology complexity, management difficulty, and limited participation in care has resulted in healthcare systems seeking new strategies to engage people living with diabet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martin-Delgado, Jimmy, Guilabert, Mercedes, Mira-Solves, José
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8563512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34043215
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40271-021-00526-y
_version_ 1784593419444682752
author Martin-Delgado, Jimmy
Guilabert, Mercedes
Mira-Solves, José
author_facet Martin-Delgado, Jimmy
Guilabert, Mercedes
Mira-Solves, José
author_sort Martin-Delgado, Jimmy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus is a global public health concern, with over 463 million people living with this chronic disease. Pathology complexity, management difficulty, and limited participation in care has resulted in healthcare systems seeking new strategies to engage people living with diabetes. Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were developed to address the gap between the healthcare system expectation and patient preference. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to review the existing literature on PREMs and PROMs specific to type 1 and 2 diabetes, and report the dimensions report the dimensions they have measured. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted from January 1985 to March 2020 of six databases, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINHAL, Scopus, and BiblioPro, to identify PREM and PROM instruments specific for type 1 and 2 diabetes. RESULTS: Overall, 34 instruments were identified, 32 PROMs and two PREMs. The most common instrument included outcomes related to quality of life at 44% (n = 15), followed by satisfaction (whether with treatment, device, and healthy habits) at 26% (n = 9). Furthermore, instruments regarding personal well-being accounted for 15% (n = 5). For instruments that measure experiences of persons with diabetes, there were two scales of symptoms, and one related to the attitude patients have toward the disease. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes-specific validated instruments mainly focus on quality of life, education, and treatment, and sometimes overlap each other, in their subscales and assessment dimensions. Constructs such as cultural and religious beliefs, leisure, and work life may need more attention. There appears to be a gap in instruments to measure experiences of individuals who “live with diabetes” and seek to lead a “normal life.” SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40271-021-00526-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8563512
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85635122021-11-15 Patient-Reported Experience and Outcome Measures in People Living with Diabetes: A Scoping Review of Instruments Martin-Delgado, Jimmy Guilabert, Mercedes Mira-Solves, José Patient Scoping Review BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus is a global public health concern, with over 463 million people living with this chronic disease. Pathology complexity, management difficulty, and limited participation in care has resulted in healthcare systems seeking new strategies to engage people living with diabetes. Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were developed to address the gap between the healthcare system expectation and patient preference. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to review the existing literature on PREMs and PROMs specific to type 1 and 2 diabetes, and report the dimensions report the dimensions they have measured. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted from January 1985 to March 2020 of six databases, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINHAL, Scopus, and BiblioPro, to identify PREM and PROM instruments specific for type 1 and 2 diabetes. RESULTS: Overall, 34 instruments were identified, 32 PROMs and two PREMs. The most common instrument included outcomes related to quality of life at 44% (n = 15), followed by satisfaction (whether with treatment, device, and healthy habits) at 26% (n = 9). Furthermore, instruments regarding personal well-being accounted for 15% (n = 5). For instruments that measure experiences of persons with diabetes, there were two scales of symptoms, and one related to the attitude patients have toward the disease. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes-specific validated instruments mainly focus on quality of life, education, and treatment, and sometimes overlap each other, in their subscales and assessment dimensions. Constructs such as cultural and religious beliefs, leisure, and work life may need more attention. There appears to be a gap in instruments to measure experiences of individuals who “live with diabetes” and seek to lead a “normal life.” SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40271-021-00526-y. Springer International Publishing 2021-05-27 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8563512/ /pubmed/34043215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40271-021-00526-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Scoping Review
Martin-Delgado, Jimmy
Guilabert, Mercedes
Mira-Solves, José
Patient-Reported Experience and Outcome Measures in People Living with Diabetes: A Scoping Review of Instruments
title Patient-Reported Experience and Outcome Measures in People Living with Diabetes: A Scoping Review of Instruments
title_full Patient-Reported Experience and Outcome Measures in People Living with Diabetes: A Scoping Review of Instruments
title_fullStr Patient-Reported Experience and Outcome Measures in People Living with Diabetes: A Scoping Review of Instruments
title_full_unstemmed Patient-Reported Experience and Outcome Measures in People Living with Diabetes: A Scoping Review of Instruments
title_short Patient-Reported Experience and Outcome Measures in People Living with Diabetes: A Scoping Review of Instruments
title_sort patient-reported experience and outcome measures in people living with diabetes: a scoping review of instruments
topic Scoping Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8563512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34043215
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40271-021-00526-y
work_keys_str_mv AT martindelgadojimmy patientreportedexperienceandoutcomemeasuresinpeoplelivingwithdiabetesascopingreviewofinstruments
AT guilabertmercedes patientreportedexperienceandoutcomemeasuresinpeoplelivingwithdiabetesascopingreviewofinstruments
AT mirasolvesjose patientreportedexperienceandoutcomemeasuresinpeoplelivingwithdiabetesascopingreviewofinstruments