Cargando…

Salience effects in information acquisition: No evidence for a top-down coherence influence

The Integrated Coherence-Based Decision and Search (iCodes) model proposed by Jekel et al. (Psychological Review, 125 (5), 744–768, 2018) formalizes both decision making and pre-decisional information search as coherence-maximization processes in an interactive network. Next to bottom-up attribute i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bröder, Arndt, Scharf, Sophie, Jekel, Marc, Glöckner, Andreas, Franke, Nicole
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8563519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34133002
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-021-01188-9
_version_ 1784593420433489920
author Bröder, Arndt
Scharf, Sophie
Jekel, Marc
Glöckner, Andreas
Franke, Nicole
author_facet Bröder, Arndt
Scharf, Sophie
Jekel, Marc
Glöckner, Andreas
Franke, Nicole
author_sort Bröder, Arndt
collection PubMed
description The Integrated Coherence-Based Decision and Search (iCodes) model proposed by Jekel et al. (Psychological Review, 125 (5), 744–768, 2018) formalizes both decision making and pre-decisional information search as coherence-maximization processes in an interactive network. Next to bottom-up attribute influences, the coherence of option information exerts a top-down influence on the search processes in this model, predicting the tendency to continue information search with the currently most attractive option. This hallmark “attraction search effect” (ASE) has been demonstrated in several studies. In three experiments with 250 participants altogether, a more subtle prediction of an extended version of iCodes including exogenous influence factors was tested: The salience of information is assumed to have both a direct (bottom-up) and an indirect (top-down) effect on search, the latter driven by the match between information valence and option attractiveness. The results of the experiments largely agree in (1) showing a strong ASE, (2) demonstrating a bottom-up salience effect on search, but (3) suggesting the absence of the hypothesized indirect top-down salience effect. Hence, only two of three model predictions were confirmed. Implications for various implementations of exogenous factors in the iCodes model are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8563519
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85635192021-11-15 Salience effects in information acquisition: No evidence for a top-down coherence influence Bröder, Arndt Scharf, Sophie Jekel, Marc Glöckner, Andreas Franke, Nicole Mem Cognit Article The Integrated Coherence-Based Decision and Search (iCodes) model proposed by Jekel et al. (Psychological Review, 125 (5), 744–768, 2018) formalizes both decision making and pre-decisional information search as coherence-maximization processes in an interactive network. Next to bottom-up attribute influences, the coherence of option information exerts a top-down influence on the search processes in this model, predicting the tendency to continue information search with the currently most attractive option. This hallmark “attraction search effect” (ASE) has been demonstrated in several studies. In three experiments with 250 participants altogether, a more subtle prediction of an extended version of iCodes including exogenous influence factors was tested: The salience of information is assumed to have both a direct (bottom-up) and an indirect (top-down) effect on search, the latter driven by the match between information valence and option attractiveness. The results of the experiments largely agree in (1) showing a strong ASE, (2) demonstrating a bottom-up salience effect on search, but (3) suggesting the absence of the hypothesized indirect top-down salience effect. Hence, only two of three model predictions were confirmed. Implications for various implementations of exogenous factors in the iCodes model are discussed. Springer US 2021-06-16 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8563519/ /pubmed/34133002 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-021-01188-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Bröder, Arndt
Scharf, Sophie
Jekel, Marc
Glöckner, Andreas
Franke, Nicole
Salience effects in information acquisition: No evidence for a top-down coherence influence
title Salience effects in information acquisition: No evidence for a top-down coherence influence
title_full Salience effects in information acquisition: No evidence for a top-down coherence influence
title_fullStr Salience effects in information acquisition: No evidence for a top-down coherence influence
title_full_unstemmed Salience effects in information acquisition: No evidence for a top-down coherence influence
title_short Salience effects in information acquisition: No evidence for a top-down coherence influence
title_sort salience effects in information acquisition: no evidence for a top-down coherence influence
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8563519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34133002
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-021-01188-9
work_keys_str_mv AT broderarndt salienceeffectsininformationacquisitionnoevidenceforatopdowncoherenceinfluence
AT scharfsophie salienceeffectsininformationacquisitionnoevidenceforatopdowncoherenceinfluence
AT jekelmarc salienceeffectsininformationacquisitionnoevidenceforatopdowncoherenceinfluence
AT glocknerandreas salienceeffectsininformationacquisitionnoevidenceforatopdowncoherenceinfluence
AT frankenicole salienceeffectsininformationacquisitionnoevidenceforatopdowncoherenceinfluence