Cargando…
A matter of atrophy: differential impact of brain and spine damage on disability worsening in multiple sclerosis
As atrophy represents the most relevant driver of progression in multiple sclerosis (MS), we investigated the impact of different patterns of brain and spinal cord atrophy on disability worsening in MS. We acquired clinical and MRI data from 90 patients with relapsing–remitting MS and 24 healthy con...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8563557/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33942160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-021-10576-9 |
_version_ | 1784593428538982400 |
---|---|
author | Ruggieri, Serena Petracca, Maria De Giglio, Laura De Luca, Francesca Giannì, Costanza Gurreri, Flavia Petsas, Nikolaos Tommasin, Silvia Pozzilli, Carlo Pantano, Patrizia |
author_facet | Ruggieri, Serena Petracca, Maria De Giglio, Laura De Luca, Francesca Giannì, Costanza Gurreri, Flavia Petsas, Nikolaos Tommasin, Silvia Pozzilli, Carlo Pantano, Patrizia |
author_sort | Ruggieri, Serena |
collection | PubMed |
description | As atrophy represents the most relevant driver of progression in multiple sclerosis (MS), we investigated the impact of different patterns of brain and spinal cord atrophy on disability worsening in MS. We acquired clinical and MRI data from 90 patients with relapsing–remitting MS and 24 healthy controls (HC). Clinical progression at follow-up (mean 3.7 years) was defined according to the Expanded Disability Status Scale-Plus. Brain and spinal cord volumes were computed on MRI brain scans. After normalizing each participants’ brain and spine volume to the mean of the HC, z-score cut-offs were applied to separate pathologically atrophic from normal brain and spine volumes (accepting a 2.5% error probability). Accordingly, MS patients were classified into four groups (Group I: no brain or spinal cord atrophy N = 40, Group II: brain atrophy/no spinal cord atrophy N = 11, Group III: no brain atrophy/ spinal cord atrophy N = 32, Group IV: both brain and spinal cord atrophy N = 7). All patients’ groups showed significantly lower brain volume than HC (p < 0.0001). Group III and IV showed lower spine volume than HC (p < 0.0001 for both). Higher brain lesion load was identified in Group II (p = 0.049) and Group IV (p = 0.023) vs Group I, and in Group IV (p = 0.048) vs Group III. Spinal cord atrophy (OR = 3.75, p = 0.018) and brain + spinal cord atrophy (OR = 5.71, p = 0.046) were significant predictors of disability progression. The presence of concomitant brain and spinal cord atrophy is the strongest correlate of progression over time. Isolated spinal cord atrophy exerts a similar effect, confirming the leading role of spinal cord atrophy in the determination of motor disability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8563557 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85635572021-11-04 A matter of atrophy: differential impact of brain and spine damage on disability worsening in multiple sclerosis Ruggieri, Serena Petracca, Maria De Giglio, Laura De Luca, Francesca Giannì, Costanza Gurreri, Flavia Petsas, Nikolaos Tommasin, Silvia Pozzilli, Carlo Pantano, Patrizia J Neurol Original Communication As atrophy represents the most relevant driver of progression in multiple sclerosis (MS), we investigated the impact of different patterns of brain and spinal cord atrophy on disability worsening in MS. We acquired clinical and MRI data from 90 patients with relapsing–remitting MS and 24 healthy controls (HC). Clinical progression at follow-up (mean 3.7 years) was defined according to the Expanded Disability Status Scale-Plus. Brain and spinal cord volumes were computed on MRI brain scans. After normalizing each participants’ brain and spine volume to the mean of the HC, z-score cut-offs were applied to separate pathologically atrophic from normal brain and spine volumes (accepting a 2.5% error probability). Accordingly, MS patients were classified into four groups (Group I: no brain or spinal cord atrophy N = 40, Group II: brain atrophy/no spinal cord atrophy N = 11, Group III: no brain atrophy/ spinal cord atrophy N = 32, Group IV: both brain and spinal cord atrophy N = 7). All patients’ groups showed significantly lower brain volume than HC (p < 0.0001). Group III and IV showed lower spine volume than HC (p < 0.0001 for both). Higher brain lesion load was identified in Group II (p = 0.049) and Group IV (p = 0.023) vs Group I, and in Group IV (p = 0.048) vs Group III. Spinal cord atrophy (OR = 3.75, p = 0.018) and brain + spinal cord atrophy (OR = 5.71, p = 0.046) were significant predictors of disability progression. The presence of concomitant brain and spinal cord atrophy is the strongest correlate of progression over time. Isolated spinal cord atrophy exerts a similar effect, confirming the leading role of spinal cord atrophy in the determination of motor disability. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-05-03 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8563557/ /pubmed/33942160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-021-10576-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Communication Ruggieri, Serena Petracca, Maria De Giglio, Laura De Luca, Francesca Giannì, Costanza Gurreri, Flavia Petsas, Nikolaos Tommasin, Silvia Pozzilli, Carlo Pantano, Patrizia A matter of atrophy: differential impact of brain and spine damage on disability worsening in multiple sclerosis |
title | A matter of atrophy: differential impact of brain and spine damage on disability worsening in multiple sclerosis |
title_full | A matter of atrophy: differential impact of brain and spine damage on disability worsening in multiple sclerosis |
title_fullStr | A matter of atrophy: differential impact of brain and spine damage on disability worsening in multiple sclerosis |
title_full_unstemmed | A matter of atrophy: differential impact of brain and spine damage on disability worsening in multiple sclerosis |
title_short | A matter of atrophy: differential impact of brain and spine damage on disability worsening in multiple sclerosis |
title_sort | matter of atrophy: differential impact of brain and spine damage on disability worsening in multiple sclerosis |
topic | Original Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8563557/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33942160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-021-10576-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ruggieriserena amatterofatrophydifferentialimpactofbrainandspinedamageondisabilityworseninginmultiplesclerosis AT petraccamaria amatterofatrophydifferentialimpactofbrainandspinedamageondisabilityworseninginmultiplesclerosis AT degigliolaura amatterofatrophydifferentialimpactofbrainandspinedamageondisabilityworseninginmultiplesclerosis AT delucafrancesca amatterofatrophydifferentialimpactofbrainandspinedamageondisabilityworseninginmultiplesclerosis AT giannicostanza amatterofatrophydifferentialimpactofbrainandspinedamageondisabilityworseninginmultiplesclerosis AT gurreriflavia amatterofatrophydifferentialimpactofbrainandspinedamageondisabilityworseninginmultiplesclerosis AT petsasnikolaos amatterofatrophydifferentialimpactofbrainandspinedamageondisabilityworseninginmultiplesclerosis AT tommasinsilvia amatterofatrophydifferentialimpactofbrainandspinedamageondisabilityworseninginmultiplesclerosis AT pozzillicarlo amatterofatrophydifferentialimpactofbrainandspinedamageondisabilityworseninginmultiplesclerosis AT pantanopatrizia amatterofatrophydifferentialimpactofbrainandspinedamageondisabilityworseninginmultiplesclerosis AT ruggieriserena matterofatrophydifferentialimpactofbrainandspinedamageondisabilityworseninginmultiplesclerosis AT petraccamaria matterofatrophydifferentialimpactofbrainandspinedamageondisabilityworseninginmultiplesclerosis AT degigliolaura matterofatrophydifferentialimpactofbrainandspinedamageondisabilityworseninginmultiplesclerosis AT delucafrancesca matterofatrophydifferentialimpactofbrainandspinedamageondisabilityworseninginmultiplesclerosis AT giannicostanza matterofatrophydifferentialimpactofbrainandspinedamageondisabilityworseninginmultiplesclerosis AT gurreriflavia matterofatrophydifferentialimpactofbrainandspinedamageondisabilityworseninginmultiplesclerosis AT petsasnikolaos matterofatrophydifferentialimpactofbrainandspinedamageondisabilityworseninginmultiplesclerosis AT tommasinsilvia matterofatrophydifferentialimpactofbrainandspinedamageondisabilityworseninginmultiplesclerosis AT pozzillicarlo matterofatrophydifferentialimpactofbrainandspinedamageondisabilityworseninginmultiplesclerosis AT pantanopatrizia matterofatrophydifferentialimpactofbrainandspinedamageondisabilityworseninginmultiplesclerosis |