Cargando…

A matter of atrophy: differential impact of brain and spine damage on disability worsening in multiple sclerosis

As atrophy represents the most relevant driver of progression in multiple sclerosis (MS), we investigated the impact of different patterns of brain and spinal cord atrophy on disability worsening in MS. We acquired clinical and MRI data from 90 patients with relapsing–remitting MS and 24 healthy con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruggieri, Serena, Petracca, Maria, De Giglio, Laura, De Luca, Francesca, Giannì, Costanza, Gurreri, Flavia, Petsas, Nikolaos, Tommasin, Silvia, Pozzilli, Carlo, Pantano, Patrizia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8563557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33942160
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-021-10576-9
_version_ 1784593428538982400
author Ruggieri, Serena
Petracca, Maria
De Giglio, Laura
De Luca, Francesca
Giannì, Costanza
Gurreri, Flavia
Petsas, Nikolaos
Tommasin, Silvia
Pozzilli, Carlo
Pantano, Patrizia
author_facet Ruggieri, Serena
Petracca, Maria
De Giglio, Laura
De Luca, Francesca
Giannì, Costanza
Gurreri, Flavia
Petsas, Nikolaos
Tommasin, Silvia
Pozzilli, Carlo
Pantano, Patrizia
author_sort Ruggieri, Serena
collection PubMed
description As atrophy represents the most relevant driver of progression in multiple sclerosis (MS), we investigated the impact of different patterns of brain and spinal cord atrophy on disability worsening in MS. We acquired clinical and MRI data from 90 patients with relapsing–remitting MS and 24 healthy controls (HC). Clinical progression at follow-up (mean 3.7 years) was defined according to the Expanded Disability Status Scale-Plus. Brain and spinal cord volumes were computed on MRI brain scans. After normalizing each participants’ brain and spine volume to the mean of the HC, z-score cut-offs were applied to separate pathologically atrophic from normal brain and spine volumes (accepting a 2.5% error probability). Accordingly, MS patients were classified into four groups (Group I: no brain or spinal cord atrophy N = 40, Group II: brain atrophy/no spinal cord atrophy N = 11, Group III: no brain atrophy/ spinal cord atrophy N = 32, Group IV: both brain and spinal cord atrophy N = 7). All patients’ groups showed significantly lower brain volume than HC (p < 0.0001). Group III and IV showed lower spine volume than HC (p < 0.0001 for both). Higher brain lesion load was identified in Group II (p = 0.049) and Group IV (p = 0.023) vs Group I, and in Group IV (p = 0.048) vs Group III. Spinal cord atrophy (OR = 3.75, p = 0.018) and brain + spinal cord atrophy (OR = 5.71, p = 0.046) were significant predictors of disability progression. The presence of concomitant brain and spinal cord atrophy is the strongest correlate of progression over time. Isolated spinal cord atrophy exerts a similar effect, confirming the leading role of spinal cord atrophy in the determination of motor disability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8563557
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85635572021-11-04 A matter of atrophy: differential impact of brain and spine damage on disability worsening in multiple sclerosis Ruggieri, Serena Petracca, Maria De Giglio, Laura De Luca, Francesca Giannì, Costanza Gurreri, Flavia Petsas, Nikolaos Tommasin, Silvia Pozzilli, Carlo Pantano, Patrizia J Neurol Original Communication As atrophy represents the most relevant driver of progression in multiple sclerosis (MS), we investigated the impact of different patterns of brain and spinal cord atrophy on disability worsening in MS. We acquired clinical and MRI data from 90 patients with relapsing–remitting MS and 24 healthy controls (HC). Clinical progression at follow-up (mean 3.7 years) was defined according to the Expanded Disability Status Scale-Plus. Brain and spinal cord volumes were computed on MRI brain scans. After normalizing each participants’ brain and spine volume to the mean of the HC, z-score cut-offs were applied to separate pathologically atrophic from normal brain and spine volumes (accepting a 2.5% error probability). Accordingly, MS patients were classified into four groups (Group I: no brain or spinal cord atrophy N = 40, Group II: brain atrophy/no spinal cord atrophy N = 11, Group III: no brain atrophy/ spinal cord atrophy N = 32, Group IV: both brain and spinal cord atrophy N = 7). All patients’ groups showed significantly lower brain volume than HC (p < 0.0001). Group III and IV showed lower spine volume than HC (p < 0.0001 for both). Higher brain lesion load was identified in Group II (p = 0.049) and Group IV (p = 0.023) vs Group I, and in Group IV (p = 0.048) vs Group III. Spinal cord atrophy (OR = 3.75, p = 0.018) and brain + spinal cord atrophy (OR = 5.71, p = 0.046) were significant predictors of disability progression. The presence of concomitant brain and spinal cord atrophy is the strongest correlate of progression over time. Isolated spinal cord atrophy exerts a similar effect, confirming the leading role of spinal cord atrophy in the determination of motor disability. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-05-03 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8563557/ /pubmed/33942160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-021-10576-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Communication
Ruggieri, Serena
Petracca, Maria
De Giglio, Laura
De Luca, Francesca
Giannì, Costanza
Gurreri, Flavia
Petsas, Nikolaos
Tommasin, Silvia
Pozzilli, Carlo
Pantano, Patrizia
A matter of atrophy: differential impact of brain and spine damage on disability worsening in multiple sclerosis
title A matter of atrophy: differential impact of brain and spine damage on disability worsening in multiple sclerosis
title_full A matter of atrophy: differential impact of brain and spine damage on disability worsening in multiple sclerosis
title_fullStr A matter of atrophy: differential impact of brain and spine damage on disability worsening in multiple sclerosis
title_full_unstemmed A matter of atrophy: differential impact of brain and spine damage on disability worsening in multiple sclerosis
title_short A matter of atrophy: differential impact of brain and spine damage on disability worsening in multiple sclerosis
title_sort matter of atrophy: differential impact of brain and spine damage on disability worsening in multiple sclerosis
topic Original Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8563557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33942160
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-021-10576-9
work_keys_str_mv AT ruggieriserena amatterofatrophydifferentialimpactofbrainandspinedamageondisabilityworseninginmultiplesclerosis
AT petraccamaria amatterofatrophydifferentialimpactofbrainandspinedamageondisabilityworseninginmultiplesclerosis
AT degigliolaura amatterofatrophydifferentialimpactofbrainandspinedamageondisabilityworseninginmultiplesclerosis
AT delucafrancesca amatterofatrophydifferentialimpactofbrainandspinedamageondisabilityworseninginmultiplesclerosis
AT giannicostanza amatterofatrophydifferentialimpactofbrainandspinedamageondisabilityworseninginmultiplesclerosis
AT gurreriflavia amatterofatrophydifferentialimpactofbrainandspinedamageondisabilityworseninginmultiplesclerosis
AT petsasnikolaos amatterofatrophydifferentialimpactofbrainandspinedamageondisabilityworseninginmultiplesclerosis
AT tommasinsilvia amatterofatrophydifferentialimpactofbrainandspinedamageondisabilityworseninginmultiplesclerosis
AT pozzillicarlo amatterofatrophydifferentialimpactofbrainandspinedamageondisabilityworseninginmultiplesclerosis
AT pantanopatrizia amatterofatrophydifferentialimpactofbrainandspinedamageondisabilityworseninginmultiplesclerosis
AT ruggieriserena matterofatrophydifferentialimpactofbrainandspinedamageondisabilityworseninginmultiplesclerosis
AT petraccamaria matterofatrophydifferentialimpactofbrainandspinedamageondisabilityworseninginmultiplesclerosis
AT degigliolaura matterofatrophydifferentialimpactofbrainandspinedamageondisabilityworseninginmultiplesclerosis
AT delucafrancesca matterofatrophydifferentialimpactofbrainandspinedamageondisabilityworseninginmultiplesclerosis
AT giannicostanza matterofatrophydifferentialimpactofbrainandspinedamageondisabilityworseninginmultiplesclerosis
AT gurreriflavia matterofatrophydifferentialimpactofbrainandspinedamageondisabilityworseninginmultiplesclerosis
AT petsasnikolaos matterofatrophydifferentialimpactofbrainandspinedamageondisabilityworseninginmultiplesclerosis
AT tommasinsilvia matterofatrophydifferentialimpactofbrainandspinedamageondisabilityworseninginmultiplesclerosis
AT pozzillicarlo matterofatrophydifferentialimpactofbrainandspinedamageondisabilityworseninginmultiplesclerosis
AT pantanopatrizia matterofatrophydifferentialimpactofbrainandspinedamageondisabilityworseninginmultiplesclerosis