Cargando…

A systematic scoping review of published qualitative research pertaining to the field of perioperative anesthesiology

PURPOSE: Qualitative research (QR) take advantage of a wide range of methods and theoretical frameworks to explore people’s beliefs, perspectives, experiences, and behaviours and has been applied to many areas of healthcare. The aim of this review was to explore how QR has contributed to the field o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gisselbaek, Mia, Hudelson, Patricia, Savoldelli, Georges L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8563559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34608588
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-021-02106-y
_version_ 1784593429023424512
author Gisselbaek, Mia
Hudelson, Patricia
Savoldelli, Georges L.
author_facet Gisselbaek, Mia
Hudelson, Patricia
Savoldelli, Georges L.
author_sort Gisselbaek, Mia
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Qualitative research (QR) take advantage of a wide range of methods and theoretical frameworks to explore people’s beliefs, perspectives, experiences, and behaviours and has been applied to many areas of healthcare. The aim of this review was to explore how QR has contributed to the field of perioperative anesthesiology. SOURCE: We performed a systematic scoping review of published QR studies pertaining to the field of perioperative anesthesiology in three databases (CINAHL, Pubmed, and Embase), published between January 2000 and June 2018. We extracted data regarding publication and researchers’ characteristics, main study objectives, and methodological details. Descriptive statistics were generated for each data extraction category. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: A total of 107 articles fulfilled our inclusion criteria. We identified 13 main research topics addressed by the included studies. Topics such as “patient safety,” “barriers to evidence-base medicine,” “patient experiences under local/regional anesthesia,” “training in practice,” “experiences of care,” and “implementation of changes in clinical practice” were commonly tackled. Others, such as “interprofessional communication”, “work environment,” and “patients’/healthcare professionals’ interactions” were less common. Qualitative research was often poorly reported and methodological details were frequently missing. CONCLUSION: Qualitative research has been used to explore an array of issues in perioperative anesthesiology. Some areas may benefit from further primary research, such as interprofessional communication or patient-centred care, while other areas may deserve a detailed systematic knowledge synthesis. We identified suboptimal reporting of qualitative methods and their link to study findings. Increased attention to quality criteria and reporting standards in QR is called for. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12630-021-02106-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8563559
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85635592021-11-04 A systematic scoping review of published qualitative research pertaining to the field of perioperative anesthesiology Gisselbaek, Mia Hudelson, Patricia Savoldelli, Georges L. Can J Anaesth Review Article/Brief Review PURPOSE: Qualitative research (QR) take advantage of a wide range of methods and theoretical frameworks to explore people’s beliefs, perspectives, experiences, and behaviours and has been applied to many areas of healthcare. The aim of this review was to explore how QR has contributed to the field of perioperative anesthesiology. SOURCE: We performed a systematic scoping review of published QR studies pertaining to the field of perioperative anesthesiology in three databases (CINAHL, Pubmed, and Embase), published between January 2000 and June 2018. We extracted data regarding publication and researchers’ characteristics, main study objectives, and methodological details. Descriptive statistics were generated for each data extraction category. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: A total of 107 articles fulfilled our inclusion criteria. We identified 13 main research topics addressed by the included studies. Topics such as “patient safety,” “barriers to evidence-base medicine,” “patient experiences under local/regional anesthesia,” “training in practice,” “experiences of care,” and “implementation of changes in clinical practice” were commonly tackled. Others, such as “interprofessional communication”, “work environment,” and “patients’/healthcare professionals’ interactions” were less common. Qualitative research was often poorly reported and methodological details were frequently missing. CONCLUSION: Qualitative research has been used to explore an array of issues in perioperative anesthesiology. Some areas may benefit from further primary research, such as interprofessional communication or patient-centred care, while other areas may deserve a detailed systematic knowledge synthesis. We identified suboptimal reporting of qualitative methods and their link to study findings. Increased attention to quality criteria and reporting standards in QR is called for. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12630-021-02106-y. Springer International Publishing 2021-10-04 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8563559/ /pubmed/34608588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-021-02106-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article/Brief Review
Gisselbaek, Mia
Hudelson, Patricia
Savoldelli, Georges L.
A systematic scoping review of published qualitative research pertaining to the field of perioperative anesthesiology
title A systematic scoping review of published qualitative research pertaining to the field of perioperative anesthesiology
title_full A systematic scoping review of published qualitative research pertaining to the field of perioperative anesthesiology
title_fullStr A systematic scoping review of published qualitative research pertaining to the field of perioperative anesthesiology
title_full_unstemmed A systematic scoping review of published qualitative research pertaining to the field of perioperative anesthesiology
title_short A systematic scoping review of published qualitative research pertaining to the field of perioperative anesthesiology
title_sort systematic scoping review of published qualitative research pertaining to the field of perioperative anesthesiology
topic Review Article/Brief Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8563559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34608588
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-021-02106-y
work_keys_str_mv AT gisselbaekmia asystematicscopingreviewofpublishedqualitativeresearchpertainingtothefieldofperioperativeanesthesiology
AT hudelsonpatricia asystematicscopingreviewofpublishedqualitativeresearchpertainingtothefieldofperioperativeanesthesiology
AT savoldelligeorgesl asystematicscopingreviewofpublishedqualitativeresearchpertainingtothefieldofperioperativeanesthesiology
AT gisselbaekmia systematicscopingreviewofpublishedqualitativeresearchpertainingtothefieldofperioperativeanesthesiology
AT hudelsonpatricia systematicscopingreviewofpublishedqualitativeresearchpertainingtothefieldofperioperativeanesthesiology
AT savoldelligeorgesl systematicscopingreviewofpublishedqualitativeresearchpertainingtothefieldofperioperativeanesthesiology