Cargando…
Risk factors and protective measures for healthcare worker infection during highly infectious viral respiratory epidemics: A systematic review and meta-analysis
OBJECTIVE: To investigate risk factors for healthcare worker (HCW) infection in viral respiratory pandemics: severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), SARS CoV-1, influenza A H1N1, influenza H5N1. To improve understanding of HCW risk manageme...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8564050/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33487203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ice.2021.18 |
_version_ | 1784593531347664896 |
---|---|
author | Tian, Chenchen Lovrics, Olivia Vaisman, Alon Chin, Ki Jinn Tomlinson, George Lee, Yung Englesakis, Marina Parotto, Matteo Singh, Mandeep |
author_facet | Tian, Chenchen Lovrics, Olivia Vaisman, Alon Chin, Ki Jinn Tomlinson, George Lee, Yung Englesakis, Marina Parotto, Matteo Singh, Mandeep |
author_sort | Tian, Chenchen |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To investigate risk factors for healthcare worker (HCW) infection in viral respiratory pandemics: severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), SARS CoV-1, influenza A H1N1, influenza H5N1. To improve understanding of HCW risk management amid the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases from conception until July 2020 for studies comparing infected HCWs (cases) and noninfected HCWs (controls) and risk factors for infection. Outcomes included HCW types, infection prevention practices, and medical procedures. Pooled effect estimates with pathogen-specific stratified meta-analysis and inverse variance meta-regression analysis were completed. We used the GRADE framework to rate certainty of evidence. (PROSPERO no. CRD42020176232, 6 April 2020.) RESULTS: In total, 54 comparative studies were included (n = 191,004 HCWs). Compared to nonfrontline HCWs, frontline HCWs were at increased infection risk (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.24–2.22), and the risk was greater for HCWs involved in endotracheal intubations (risk difference, 35.2%; 95% CI, 21.4–47.9). Use of gloves, gown, surgical mask, N95 respirator, face protection, and infection training were each strongly protective against infection. Meta-regression showed reduced infection risk in frontline HCWs working in facilities with infection designated wards (OR, −1.04; 95% CI, −1.53 to −0.33, P = .004) and performing aerosol-generating medical procedures in designated centers (OR, −1.30; 95% CI, −2.52 to −0.08; P = .037). CONCLUSIONS: During highly infectious respiratory pandemics, widely available protective measures such as use of gloves, gowns, and face masks are strongly protective against infection and should be instituted, preferably in dedicated settings, to protect frontline HCW during waves of respiratory virus pandemics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8564050 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85640502021-11-03 Risk factors and protective measures for healthcare worker infection during highly infectious viral respiratory epidemics: A systematic review and meta-analysis Tian, Chenchen Lovrics, Olivia Vaisman, Alon Chin, Ki Jinn Tomlinson, George Lee, Yung Englesakis, Marina Parotto, Matteo Singh, Mandeep Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Review OBJECTIVE: To investigate risk factors for healthcare worker (HCW) infection in viral respiratory pandemics: severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), SARS CoV-1, influenza A H1N1, influenza H5N1. To improve understanding of HCW risk management amid the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases from conception until July 2020 for studies comparing infected HCWs (cases) and noninfected HCWs (controls) and risk factors for infection. Outcomes included HCW types, infection prevention practices, and medical procedures. Pooled effect estimates with pathogen-specific stratified meta-analysis and inverse variance meta-regression analysis were completed. We used the GRADE framework to rate certainty of evidence. (PROSPERO no. CRD42020176232, 6 April 2020.) RESULTS: In total, 54 comparative studies were included (n = 191,004 HCWs). Compared to nonfrontline HCWs, frontline HCWs were at increased infection risk (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.24–2.22), and the risk was greater for HCWs involved in endotracheal intubations (risk difference, 35.2%; 95% CI, 21.4–47.9). Use of gloves, gown, surgical mask, N95 respirator, face protection, and infection training were each strongly protective against infection. Meta-regression showed reduced infection risk in frontline HCWs working in facilities with infection designated wards (OR, −1.04; 95% CI, −1.53 to −0.33, P = .004) and performing aerosol-generating medical procedures in designated centers (OR, −1.30; 95% CI, −2.52 to −0.08; P = .037). CONCLUSIONS: During highly infectious respiratory pandemics, widely available protective measures such as use of gloves, gowns, and face masks are strongly protective against infection and should be instituted, preferably in dedicated settings, to protect frontline HCW during waves of respiratory virus pandemics. Cambridge University Press 2021-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8564050/ /pubmed/33487203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ice.2021.18 Text en © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Tian, Chenchen Lovrics, Olivia Vaisman, Alon Chin, Ki Jinn Tomlinson, George Lee, Yung Englesakis, Marina Parotto, Matteo Singh, Mandeep Risk factors and protective measures for healthcare worker infection during highly infectious viral respiratory epidemics: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Risk factors and protective measures for healthcare worker infection during highly infectious viral respiratory epidemics: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Risk factors and protective measures for healthcare worker infection during highly infectious viral respiratory epidemics: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Risk factors and protective measures for healthcare worker infection during highly infectious viral respiratory epidemics: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Risk factors and protective measures for healthcare worker infection during highly infectious viral respiratory epidemics: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Risk factors and protective measures for healthcare worker infection during highly infectious viral respiratory epidemics: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | risk factors and protective measures for healthcare worker infection during highly infectious viral respiratory epidemics: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8564050/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33487203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ice.2021.18 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tianchenchen riskfactorsandprotectivemeasuresforhealthcareworkerinfectionduringhighlyinfectiousviralrespiratoryepidemicsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lovricsolivia riskfactorsandprotectivemeasuresforhealthcareworkerinfectionduringhighlyinfectiousviralrespiratoryepidemicsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT vaismanalon riskfactorsandprotectivemeasuresforhealthcareworkerinfectionduringhighlyinfectiousviralrespiratoryepidemicsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chinkijinn riskfactorsandprotectivemeasuresforhealthcareworkerinfectionduringhighlyinfectiousviralrespiratoryepidemicsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT tomlinsongeorge riskfactorsandprotectivemeasuresforhealthcareworkerinfectionduringhighlyinfectiousviralrespiratoryepidemicsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT leeyung riskfactorsandprotectivemeasuresforhealthcareworkerinfectionduringhighlyinfectiousviralrespiratoryepidemicsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT englesakismarina riskfactorsandprotectivemeasuresforhealthcareworkerinfectionduringhighlyinfectiousviralrespiratoryepidemicsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT parottomatteo riskfactorsandprotectivemeasuresforhealthcareworkerinfectionduringhighlyinfectiousviralrespiratoryepidemicsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT singhmandeep riskfactorsandprotectivemeasuresforhealthcareworkerinfectionduringhighlyinfectiousviralrespiratoryepidemicsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |