Cargando…

Informed cover measurement: Guidelines and error for point‐intercept approaches

PREMISE: The point‐intercept method is one of the most commonly used approaches to measure species cover in ecosystems worldwide. In this approach, multiple points are sampled for presence/absence of a species, and the number of present points divided by the total number of sampled points provides a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Drezner, Taly Dawn, Drezner, Zvi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8564103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34760407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aps3.11446
_version_ 1784593544240955392
author Drezner, Taly Dawn
Drezner, Zvi
author_facet Drezner, Taly Dawn
Drezner, Zvi
author_sort Drezner, Taly Dawn
collection PubMed
description PREMISE: The point‐intercept method is one of the most commonly used approaches to measure species cover in ecosystems worldwide. In this approach, multiple points are sampled for presence/absence of a species, and the number of present points divided by the total number of sampled points provides an estimate of percent cover. Our purpose is to mathematically analyze the accuracy of the point‐intercept approach and establish guidelines for its use. METHODS: We developed formulas that analyze the point‐intercept method and confirmed their effectiveness using simulations. RESULTS: We find that a point‐intercept spacing of at least 80% of the largest plant diameter provides the most reliable results. We present a user‐friendly spreadsheet that calculates the number of intercepts needed for fieldwork, as well as the standard deviation, expected deviation, and confidence interval of the collected data. DISCUSSION: We provide a variety of guidelines for establishing field protocols based on our results, including dealing with rare species and combining results for multiple species. Quadrat characteristics (intercept spacing, number of point intercepts) can now be easily calculated to guide research design prior to fieldwork; after fieldwork is complete, the accuracy of this technique can (and should) be reported in all future ecological studies in which it is used.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8564103
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85641032021-11-09 Informed cover measurement: Guidelines and error for point‐intercept approaches Drezner, Taly Dawn Drezner, Zvi Appl Plant Sci Application Article PREMISE: The point‐intercept method is one of the most commonly used approaches to measure species cover in ecosystems worldwide. In this approach, multiple points are sampled for presence/absence of a species, and the number of present points divided by the total number of sampled points provides an estimate of percent cover. Our purpose is to mathematically analyze the accuracy of the point‐intercept approach and establish guidelines for its use. METHODS: We developed formulas that analyze the point‐intercept method and confirmed their effectiveness using simulations. RESULTS: We find that a point‐intercept spacing of at least 80% of the largest plant diameter provides the most reliable results. We present a user‐friendly spreadsheet that calculates the number of intercepts needed for fieldwork, as well as the standard deviation, expected deviation, and confidence interval of the collected data. DISCUSSION: We provide a variety of guidelines for establishing field protocols based on our results, including dealing with rare species and combining results for multiple species. Quadrat characteristics (intercept spacing, number of point intercepts) can now be easily calculated to guide research design prior to fieldwork; after fieldwork is complete, the accuracy of this technique can (and should) be reported in all future ecological studies in which it is used. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8564103/ /pubmed/34760407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aps3.11446 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Applications in Plant Sciences published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Botanical Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Application Article
Drezner, Taly Dawn
Drezner, Zvi
Informed cover measurement: Guidelines and error for point‐intercept approaches
title Informed cover measurement: Guidelines and error for point‐intercept approaches
title_full Informed cover measurement: Guidelines and error for point‐intercept approaches
title_fullStr Informed cover measurement: Guidelines and error for point‐intercept approaches
title_full_unstemmed Informed cover measurement: Guidelines and error for point‐intercept approaches
title_short Informed cover measurement: Guidelines and error for point‐intercept approaches
title_sort informed cover measurement: guidelines and error for point‐intercept approaches
topic Application Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8564103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34760407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aps3.11446
work_keys_str_mv AT dreznertalydawn informedcovermeasurementguidelinesanderrorforpointinterceptapproaches
AT dreznerzvi informedcovermeasurementguidelinesanderrorforpointinterceptapproaches