Cargando…
Informed cover measurement: Guidelines and error for point‐intercept approaches
PREMISE: The point‐intercept method is one of the most commonly used approaches to measure species cover in ecosystems worldwide. In this approach, multiple points are sampled for presence/absence of a species, and the number of present points divided by the total number of sampled points provides a...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8564103/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34760407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aps3.11446 |
_version_ | 1784593544240955392 |
---|---|
author | Drezner, Taly Dawn Drezner, Zvi |
author_facet | Drezner, Taly Dawn Drezner, Zvi |
author_sort | Drezner, Taly Dawn |
collection | PubMed |
description | PREMISE: The point‐intercept method is one of the most commonly used approaches to measure species cover in ecosystems worldwide. In this approach, multiple points are sampled for presence/absence of a species, and the number of present points divided by the total number of sampled points provides an estimate of percent cover. Our purpose is to mathematically analyze the accuracy of the point‐intercept approach and establish guidelines for its use. METHODS: We developed formulas that analyze the point‐intercept method and confirmed their effectiveness using simulations. RESULTS: We find that a point‐intercept spacing of at least 80% of the largest plant diameter provides the most reliable results. We present a user‐friendly spreadsheet that calculates the number of intercepts needed for fieldwork, as well as the standard deviation, expected deviation, and confidence interval of the collected data. DISCUSSION: We provide a variety of guidelines for establishing field protocols based on our results, including dealing with rare species and combining results for multiple species. Quadrat characteristics (intercept spacing, number of point intercepts) can now be easily calculated to guide research design prior to fieldwork; after fieldwork is complete, the accuracy of this technique can (and should) be reported in all future ecological studies in which it is used. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8564103 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85641032021-11-09 Informed cover measurement: Guidelines and error for point‐intercept approaches Drezner, Taly Dawn Drezner, Zvi Appl Plant Sci Application Article PREMISE: The point‐intercept method is one of the most commonly used approaches to measure species cover in ecosystems worldwide. In this approach, multiple points are sampled for presence/absence of a species, and the number of present points divided by the total number of sampled points provides an estimate of percent cover. Our purpose is to mathematically analyze the accuracy of the point‐intercept approach and establish guidelines for its use. METHODS: We developed formulas that analyze the point‐intercept method and confirmed their effectiveness using simulations. RESULTS: We find that a point‐intercept spacing of at least 80% of the largest plant diameter provides the most reliable results. We present a user‐friendly spreadsheet that calculates the number of intercepts needed for fieldwork, as well as the standard deviation, expected deviation, and confidence interval of the collected data. DISCUSSION: We provide a variety of guidelines for establishing field protocols based on our results, including dealing with rare species and combining results for multiple species. Quadrat characteristics (intercept spacing, number of point intercepts) can now be easily calculated to guide research design prior to fieldwork; after fieldwork is complete, the accuracy of this technique can (and should) be reported in all future ecological studies in which it is used. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8564103/ /pubmed/34760407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aps3.11446 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Applications in Plant Sciences published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Botanical Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Application Article Drezner, Taly Dawn Drezner, Zvi Informed cover measurement: Guidelines and error for point‐intercept approaches |
title | Informed cover measurement: Guidelines and error for point‐intercept approaches |
title_full | Informed cover measurement: Guidelines and error for point‐intercept approaches |
title_fullStr | Informed cover measurement: Guidelines and error for point‐intercept approaches |
title_full_unstemmed | Informed cover measurement: Guidelines and error for point‐intercept approaches |
title_short | Informed cover measurement: Guidelines and error for point‐intercept approaches |
title_sort | informed cover measurement: guidelines and error for point‐intercept approaches |
topic | Application Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8564103/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34760407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aps3.11446 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dreznertalydawn informedcovermeasurementguidelinesanderrorforpointinterceptapproaches AT dreznerzvi informedcovermeasurementguidelinesanderrorforpointinterceptapproaches |