Cargando…

Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of prevalence and location of mandibular incisive canal in patients attending King Saud University Dental Hospital

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to facilitate a surgeon's preoperative assessment by detecting the prevalence, location, and course of the mandibular incisive canal (MIC) in our population. METHODOLOGY: A retrospective study was conducted at King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. A total of 93...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alshamrani, Amal S., Tokhtah, Razan A., Al-Omar, Ahmad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8564166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34760814
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_108_21
_version_ 1784593556846936064
author Alshamrani, Amal S.
Tokhtah, Razan A.
Al-Omar, Ahmad
author_facet Alshamrani, Amal S.
Tokhtah, Razan A.
Al-Omar, Ahmad
author_sort Alshamrani, Amal S.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aims to facilitate a surgeon's preoperative assessment by detecting the prevalence, location, and course of the mandibular incisive canal (MIC) in our population. METHODOLOGY: A retrospective study was conducted at King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. A total of 93 cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of patients aged 18–50 years were taken. The images were reformatted from the sagittal sections to para-sagittal sections at premolars, canines, lateral incisors, and central incisors measured to the distance of MIC to the tooth apex, to the inferior border of the mandible, to the buccal cortex, and to the lingual cortex. RESULTS: MIC among the patients was found to be present in 96.8% of the total subjects. Prevalence between genders showed that it was present in 97.9% of the male patients and 95.5% of the female patients. The average distance from the buccal cortex is 4.88, the lingual cortex is 5.54, inferior border is 9.94, and root apices is 7.67. The age-wise and gender-wise comparison of a mean distance of MIC to the different surfaces in the different cross-sections showed that there is no correlation, and there is a significant correlation, respectively. CONCLUSION: The detection of the MIC presence and location using CBCT should be earnestly considered for surgical procedures that are intended to be done in the interforaminal region.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8564166
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85641662021-11-09 Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of prevalence and location of mandibular incisive canal in patients attending King Saud University Dental Hospital Alshamrani, Amal S. Tokhtah, Razan A. Al-Omar, Ahmad J Orthod Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: This study aims to facilitate a surgeon's preoperative assessment by detecting the prevalence, location, and course of the mandibular incisive canal (MIC) in our population. METHODOLOGY: A retrospective study was conducted at King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. A total of 93 cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of patients aged 18–50 years were taken. The images were reformatted from the sagittal sections to para-sagittal sections at premolars, canines, lateral incisors, and central incisors measured to the distance of MIC to the tooth apex, to the inferior border of the mandible, to the buccal cortex, and to the lingual cortex. RESULTS: MIC among the patients was found to be present in 96.8% of the total subjects. Prevalence between genders showed that it was present in 97.9% of the male patients and 95.5% of the female patients. The average distance from the buccal cortex is 4.88, the lingual cortex is 5.54, inferior border is 9.94, and root apices is 7.67. The age-wise and gender-wise comparison of a mean distance of MIC to the different surfaces in the different cross-sections showed that there is no correlation, and there is a significant correlation, respectively. CONCLUSION: The detection of the MIC presence and location using CBCT should be earnestly considered for surgical procedures that are intended to be done in the interforaminal region. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8564166/ /pubmed/34760814 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_108_21 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Orthodontic Science https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Alshamrani, Amal S.
Tokhtah, Razan A.
Al-Omar, Ahmad
Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of prevalence and location of mandibular incisive canal in patients attending King Saud University Dental Hospital
title Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of prevalence and location of mandibular incisive canal in patients attending King Saud University Dental Hospital
title_full Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of prevalence and location of mandibular incisive canal in patients attending King Saud University Dental Hospital
title_fullStr Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of prevalence and location of mandibular incisive canal in patients attending King Saud University Dental Hospital
title_full_unstemmed Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of prevalence and location of mandibular incisive canal in patients attending King Saud University Dental Hospital
title_short Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of prevalence and location of mandibular incisive canal in patients attending King Saud University Dental Hospital
title_sort cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of prevalence and location of mandibular incisive canal in patients attending king saud university dental hospital
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8564166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34760814
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_108_21
work_keys_str_mv AT alshamraniamals conebeamcomputedtomographyevaluationofprevalenceandlocationofmandibularincisivecanalinpatientsattendingkingsauduniversitydentalhospital
AT tokhtahrazana conebeamcomputedtomographyevaluationofprevalenceandlocationofmandibularincisivecanalinpatientsattendingkingsauduniversitydentalhospital
AT alomarahmad conebeamcomputedtomographyevaluationofprevalenceandlocationofmandibularincisivecanalinpatientsattendingkingsauduniversitydentalhospital