Cargando…
Whose Advice is Credible? Claiming Lay Expertise in a Covid-19 Online Community
During the initial months of the Covid-19 pandemic, credentialed experts—scientists, doctors, public health experts, and policymakers—as well as members of the public and patients faced radical uncertainty. Knowledge about how Covid-19 was spread, how best to diagnose the disease, and how to treat i...
Autores principales: | Au, Larry, Eyal, Gil |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8564268/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34744215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11133-021-09492-1 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Effects of Positive Language and Profession on Trustworthiness and Credibility in Online Health Advice: Experimental Study
por: König, Lars, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
WITHDRAWN: Credibility of Kazakhstan's health care system
and medical advice in the context of Covid-19 and vaccination: Covariation of
belief and science credibility
por: Shilmenova, A., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Whose Expertise Is It? Evidence for Autistic Adults as Critical Autism Experts
por: Gillespie-Lynch, Kristen, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Facing the challenges of science communication 2.0: quality, credibility and expertise
por: Bucchi, Massimiano
Publicado: (2019) -
Assessing the credibility of COVID-19 vaccine mis/disinformation in online discussion
por: Savolainen, Reijo
Publicado: (2021)