Cargando…

Can Levodopa Challenge Testing Predict the Effect of Deep Brain Stimulation? One-Year Outcomes in a Chinese Cohort

Objective: Our study examined whether levodopa challenge test (LCT) results could predict quality of life (QoL) outcomes after surgery to implant subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) electrodes to treat advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD). Methods: Forty patients with STN-DBS underwent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Wei, Shi, Dongliang, Wang, Dan, Yang, Likun, Wang, Yuhai, Jin, Lingjing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8564390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34744699
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2021.764308
_version_ 1784593608697970688
author Lin, Wei
Shi, Dongliang
Wang, Dan
Yang, Likun
Wang, Yuhai
Jin, Lingjing
author_facet Lin, Wei
Shi, Dongliang
Wang, Dan
Yang, Likun
Wang, Yuhai
Jin, Lingjing
author_sort Lin, Wei
collection PubMed
description Objective: Our study examined whether levodopa challenge test (LCT) results could predict quality of life (QoL) outcomes after surgery to implant subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) electrodes to treat advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD). Methods: Forty patients with STN-DBS underwent a follow-up 1 year after implantation surgery to analyze the correlation between preoperative levodopa impact test results and postoperative Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) III motor score, postoperative PD Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39) score, and PDQ-39 improvement. Results: Improvements in QoL were associated with several preoperative characteristics including preoperative UPDRS-III tremor, UPDRS-III tremor (off-60) (p = 0.049), UPDRS-III tremor (off-120) (p = 0.012), Mini-Mental State Examination (p = 0.012), and PDQ-39 (p = 0.012) before surgery. Multiple linear regression model using preoperative MMSE [odds ratio (OR) = 0.342, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.051–2.297], preoperative UPDRS-III tremor (OR = 2.099, 95% CI = 0.585–7.535), UPDRS-III tremor (off-60) [OR = 1.316, 95% CI = 0.804–2.154, UPDRS-III tremor (off-120) OR = 0.913, 95% CI = 0.691–1.207], correctly classified 88.5% of patients. Conclusion: Levodopa challenge test results cannot predict the effect of DBS. However, the test can be incorporated into a regression prediction model to the quality of life of PD patients after DBS with other preoperative factors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8564390
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85643902021-11-04 Can Levodopa Challenge Testing Predict the Effect of Deep Brain Stimulation? One-Year Outcomes in a Chinese Cohort Lin, Wei Shi, Dongliang Wang, Dan Yang, Likun Wang, Yuhai Jin, Lingjing Front Aging Neurosci Neuroscience Objective: Our study examined whether levodopa challenge test (LCT) results could predict quality of life (QoL) outcomes after surgery to implant subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) electrodes to treat advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD). Methods: Forty patients with STN-DBS underwent a follow-up 1 year after implantation surgery to analyze the correlation between preoperative levodopa impact test results and postoperative Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) III motor score, postoperative PD Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39) score, and PDQ-39 improvement. Results: Improvements in QoL were associated with several preoperative characteristics including preoperative UPDRS-III tremor, UPDRS-III tremor (off-60) (p = 0.049), UPDRS-III tremor (off-120) (p = 0.012), Mini-Mental State Examination (p = 0.012), and PDQ-39 (p = 0.012) before surgery. Multiple linear regression model using preoperative MMSE [odds ratio (OR) = 0.342, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.051–2.297], preoperative UPDRS-III tremor (OR = 2.099, 95% CI = 0.585–7.535), UPDRS-III tremor (off-60) [OR = 1.316, 95% CI = 0.804–2.154, UPDRS-III tremor (off-120) OR = 0.913, 95% CI = 0.691–1.207], correctly classified 88.5% of patients. Conclusion: Levodopa challenge test results cannot predict the effect of DBS. However, the test can be incorporated into a regression prediction model to the quality of life of PD patients after DBS with other preoperative factors. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8564390/ /pubmed/34744699 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2021.764308 Text en Copyright © 2021 Lin, Shi, Wang, Yang, Wang and Jin. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Lin, Wei
Shi, Dongliang
Wang, Dan
Yang, Likun
Wang, Yuhai
Jin, Lingjing
Can Levodopa Challenge Testing Predict the Effect of Deep Brain Stimulation? One-Year Outcomes in a Chinese Cohort
title Can Levodopa Challenge Testing Predict the Effect of Deep Brain Stimulation? One-Year Outcomes in a Chinese Cohort
title_full Can Levodopa Challenge Testing Predict the Effect of Deep Brain Stimulation? One-Year Outcomes in a Chinese Cohort
title_fullStr Can Levodopa Challenge Testing Predict the Effect of Deep Brain Stimulation? One-Year Outcomes in a Chinese Cohort
title_full_unstemmed Can Levodopa Challenge Testing Predict the Effect of Deep Brain Stimulation? One-Year Outcomes in a Chinese Cohort
title_short Can Levodopa Challenge Testing Predict the Effect of Deep Brain Stimulation? One-Year Outcomes in a Chinese Cohort
title_sort can levodopa challenge testing predict the effect of deep brain stimulation? one-year outcomes in a chinese cohort
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8564390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34744699
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2021.764308
work_keys_str_mv AT linwei canlevodopachallengetestingpredicttheeffectofdeepbrainstimulationoneyearoutcomesinachinesecohort
AT shidongliang canlevodopachallengetestingpredicttheeffectofdeepbrainstimulationoneyearoutcomesinachinesecohort
AT wangdan canlevodopachallengetestingpredicttheeffectofdeepbrainstimulationoneyearoutcomesinachinesecohort
AT yanglikun canlevodopachallengetestingpredicttheeffectofdeepbrainstimulationoneyearoutcomesinachinesecohort
AT wangyuhai canlevodopachallengetestingpredicttheeffectofdeepbrainstimulationoneyearoutcomesinachinesecohort
AT jinlingjing canlevodopachallengetestingpredicttheeffectofdeepbrainstimulationoneyearoutcomesinachinesecohort