Cargando…
Can Levodopa Challenge Testing Predict the Effect of Deep Brain Stimulation? One-Year Outcomes in a Chinese Cohort
Objective: Our study examined whether levodopa challenge test (LCT) results could predict quality of life (QoL) outcomes after surgery to implant subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) electrodes to treat advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD). Methods: Forty patients with STN-DBS underwent...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8564390/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34744699 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2021.764308 |
_version_ | 1784593608697970688 |
---|---|
author | Lin, Wei Shi, Dongliang Wang, Dan Yang, Likun Wang, Yuhai Jin, Lingjing |
author_facet | Lin, Wei Shi, Dongliang Wang, Dan Yang, Likun Wang, Yuhai Jin, Lingjing |
author_sort | Lin, Wei |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: Our study examined whether levodopa challenge test (LCT) results could predict quality of life (QoL) outcomes after surgery to implant subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) electrodes to treat advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD). Methods: Forty patients with STN-DBS underwent a follow-up 1 year after implantation surgery to analyze the correlation between preoperative levodopa impact test results and postoperative Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) III motor score, postoperative PD Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39) score, and PDQ-39 improvement. Results: Improvements in QoL were associated with several preoperative characteristics including preoperative UPDRS-III tremor, UPDRS-III tremor (off-60) (p = 0.049), UPDRS-III tremor (off-120) (p = 0.012), Mini-Mental State Examination (p = 0.012), and PDQ-39 (p = 0.012) before surgery. Multiple linear regression model using preoperative MMSE [odds ratio (OR) = 0.342, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.051–2.297], preoperative UPDRS-III tremor (OR = 2.099, 95% CI = 0.585–7.535), UPDRS-III tremor (off-60) [OR = 1.316, 95% CI = 0.804–2.154, UPDRS-III tremor (off-120) OR = 0.913, 95% CI = 0.691–1.207], correctly classified 88.5% of patients. Conclusion: Levodopa challenge test results cannot predict the effect of DBS. However, the test can be incorporated into a regression prediction model to the quality of life of PD patients after DBS with other preoperative factors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8564390 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85643902021-11-04 Can Levodopa Challenge Testing Predict the Effect of Deep Brain Stimulation? One-Year Outcomes in a Chinese Cohort Lin, Wei Shi, Dongliang Wang, Dan Yang, Likun Wang, Yuhai Jin, Lingjing Front Aging Neurosci Neuroscience Objective: Our study examined whether levodopa challenge test (LCT) results could predict quality of life (QoL) outcomes after surgery to implant subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) electrodes to treat advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD). Methods: Forty patients with STN-DBS underwent a follow-up 1 year after implantation surgery to analyze the correlation between preoperative levodopa impact test results and postoperative Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) III motor score, postoperative PD Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39) score, and PDQ-39 improvement. Results: Improvements in QoL were associated with several preoperative characteristics including preoperative UPDRS-III tremor, UPDRS-III tremor (off-60) (p = 0.049), UPDRS-III tremor (off-120) (p = 0.012), Mini-Mental State Examination (p = 0.012), and PDQ-39 (p = 0.012) before surgery. Multiple linear regression model using preoperative MMSE [odds ratio (OR) = 0.342, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.051–2.297], preoperative UPDRS-III tremor (OR = 2.099, 95% CI = 0.585–7.535), UPDRS-III tremor (off-60) [OR = 1.316, 95% CI = 0.804–2.154, UPDRS-III tremor (off-120) OR = 0.913, 95% CI = 0.691–1.207], correctly classified 88.5% of patients. Conclusion: Levodopa challenge test results cannot predict the effect of DBS. However, the test can be incorporated into a regression prediction model to the quality of life of PD patients after DBS with other preoperative factors. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8564390/ /pubmed/34744699 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2021.764308 Text en Copyright © 2021 Lin, Shi, Wang, Yang, Wang and Jin. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Lin, Wei Shi, Dongliang Wang, Dan Yang, Likun Wang, Yuhai Jin, Lingjing Can Levodopa Challenge Testing Predict the Effect of Deep Brain Stimulation? One-Year Outcomes in a Chinese Cohort |
title | Can Levodopa Challenge Testing Predict the Effect of Deep Brain Stimulation? One-Year Outcomes in a Chinese Cohort |
title_full | Can Levodopa Challenge Testing Predict the Effect of Deep Brain Stimulation? One-Year Outcomes in a Chinese Cohort |
title_fullStr | Can Levodopa Challenge Testing Predict the Effect of Deep Brain Stimulation? One-Year Outcomes in a Chinese Cohort |
title_full_unstemmed | Can Levodopa Challenge Testing Predict the Effect of Deep Brain Stimulation? One-Year Outcomes in a Chinese Cohort |
title_short | Can Levodopa Challenge Testing Predict the Effect of Deep Brain Stimulation? One-Year Outcomes in a Chinese Cohort |
title_sort | can levodopa challenge testing predict the effect of deep brain stimulation? one-year outcomes in a chinese cohort |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8564390/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34744699 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2021.764308 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT linwei canlevodopachallengetestingpredicttheeffectofdeepbrainstimulationoneyearoutcomesinachinesecohort AT shidongliang canlevodopachallengetestingpredicttheeffectofdeepbrainstimulationoneyearoutcomesinachinesecohort AT wangdan canlevodopachallengetestingpredicttheeffectofdeepbrainstimulationoneyearoutcomesinachinesecohort AT yanglikun canlevodopachallengetestingpredicttheeffectofdeepbrainstimulationoneyearoutcomesinachinesecohort AT wangyuhai canlevodopachallengetestingpredicttheeffectofdeepbrainstimulationoneyearoutcomesinachinesecohort AT jinlingjing canlevodopachallengetestingpredicttheeffectofdeepbrainstimulationoneyearoutcomesinachinesecohort |