Cargando…

Pupil dynamics after in-the-bag versus anterior and retropupillary iris-fixated intraocular lens implantation

An Intraocular Lens (IOL) fixated on the iris either anteriorly, as a phakic IOL, or posteriorly, as an aphakic IOL, can influence pupil motility. In this interventional case series study, we evaluated pupil size under different levels of illumination (scotopic = 0.04 lx, low-mesopic = 0.4 lx and hi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Yanxiu, Hammer, Maximilian, Yildirim, Timur M., Khoramnia, Ramin, Auffarth, Gerd U.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8564516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34728749
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01051-6
_version_ 1784593634803318784
author Sun, Yanxiu
Hammer, Maximilian
Yildirim, Timur M.
Khoramnia, Ramin
Auffarth, Gerd U.
author_facet Sun, Yanxiu
Hammer, Maximilian
Yildirim, Timur M.
Khoramnia, Ramin
Auffarth, Gerd U.
author_sort Sun, Yanxiu
collection PubMed
description An Intraocular Lens (IOL) fixated on the iris either anteriorly, as a phakic IOL, or posteriorly, as an aphakic IOL, can influence pupil motility. In this interventional case series study, we evaluated pupil size under different levels of illumination (scotopic = 0.04 lx, low-mesopic = 0.4 lx and high-mesopic = 4 lx) for anterior iris-claw IOL fixation for correcting myopia or hyperopia (IFPH), retropupillary iris-claw IOL fixation to correct aphakia or as treatment for late in-the-bag IOL dislocation/subluxation (IFRP), and capsular-fixation IOL in-the-bag implantation (IB). Pupil size was measured preoperatively for the IFPH- and IB-group as well as 6 months after surgery for all groups. We analyzed a total of 70 eyes: 22 eyes of 11 patients with phakic IOLs, 22 eyes of 20 patients in the IFRP group and 26 eyes of 13 patients in the IB group. Both IFPH and IB showed a smaller postoperative scotopic pupil size, compared with the preoperative values. When compared to postoperative values of IB and IFPH, IFRP showed a significantly smaller postoperative scotopic pupil size (IFPH: 5.89 ± 0.83 mm, IFRP: 4.37 ± 0.83 mm, IB: 5.34 ± 0.98 mm, p < 0.001) while no differences were seen at high-mesopic lighting. Neither of the surgical techniques seems to impair the constriction of the pupil.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8564516
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85645162021-11-04 Pupil dynamics after in-the-bag versus anterior and retropupillary iris-fixated intraocular lens implantation Sun, Yanxiu Hammer, Maximilian Yildirim, Timur M. Khoramnia, Ramin Auffarth, Gerd U. Sci Rep Article An Intraocular Lens (IOL) fixated on the iris either anteriorly, as a phakic IOL, or posteriorly, as an aphakic IOL, can influence pupil motility. In this interventional case series study, we evaluated pupil size under different levels of illumination (scotopic = 0.04 lx, low-mesopic = 0.4 lx and high-mesopic = 4 lx) for anterior iris-claw IOL fixation for correcting myopia or hyperopia (IFPH), retropupillary iris-claw IOL fixation to correct aphakia or as treatment for late in-the-bag IOL dislocation/subluxation (IFRP), and capsular-fixation IOL in-the-bag implantation (IB). Pupil size was measured preoperatively for the IFPH- and IB-group as well as 6 months after surgery for all groups. We analyzed a total of 70 eyes: 22 eyes of 11 patients with phakic IOLs, 22 eyes of 20 patients in the IFRP group and 26 eyes of 13 patients in the IB group. Both IFPH and IB showed a smaller postoperative scotopic pupil size, compared with the preoperative values. When compared to postoperative values of IB and IFPH, IFRP showed a significantly smaller postoperative scotopic pupil size (IFPH: 5.89 ± 0.83 mm, IFRP: 4.37 ± 0.83 mm, IB: 5.34 ± 0.98 mm, p < 0.001) while no differences were seen at high-mesopic lighting. Neither of the surgical techniques seems to impair the constriction of the pupil. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8564516/ /pubmed/34728749 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01051-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Sun, Yanxiu
Hammer, Maximilian
Yildirim, Timur M.
Khoramnia, Ramin
Auffarth, Gerd U.
Pupil dynamics after in-the-bag versus anterior and retropupillary iris-fixated intraocular lens implantation
title Pupil dynamics after in-the-bag versus anterior and retropupillary iris-fixated intraocular lens implantation
title_full Pupil dynamics after in-the-bag versus anterior and retropupillary iris-fixated intraocular lens implantation
title_fullStr Pupil dynamics after in-the-bag versus anterior and retropupillary iris-fixated intraocular lens implantation
title_full_unstemmed Pupil dynamics after in-the-bag versus anterior and retropupillary iris-fixated intraocular lens implantation
title_short Pupil dynamics after in-the-bag versus anterior and retropupillary iris-fixated intraocular lens implantation
title_sort pupil dynamics after in-the-bag versus anterior and retropupillary iris-fixated intraocular lens implantation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8564516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34728749
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01051-6
work_keys_str_mv AT sunyanxiu pupildynamicsafterinthebagversusanteriorandretropupillaryirisfixatedintraocularlensimplantation
AT hammermaximilian pupildynamicsafterinthebagversusanteriorandretropupillaryirisfixatedintraocularlensimplantation
AT yildirimtimurm pupildynamicsafterinthebagversusanteriorandretropupillaryirisfixatedintraocularlensimplantation
AT khoramniaramin pupildynamicsafterinthebagversusanteriorandretropupillaryirisfixatedintraocularlensimplantation
AT auffarthgerdu pupildynamicsafterinthebagversusanteriorandretropupillaryirisfixatedintraocularlensimplantation