Cargando…
Analysis of the Effectiveness of the Ad26.COV2.S Adenoviral Vector Vaccine for Preventing COVID-19
IMPORTANCE: Continuous assessment of the effectiveness and safety of the US Food and Drug Administration–authorized SARS-CoV-2 vaccines is critical to amplify transparency, build public trust, and ultimately improve overall health outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of the Johnson &am...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Medical Association
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8564583/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34726743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.32540 |
_version_ | 1784593647758475264 |
---|---|
author | Corchado-Garcia, Juan Zemmour, David Hughes, Travis Bandi, Hari Cristea-Platon, Tudor Lenehan, Patrick Pawlowski, Colin Bade, Sairam O’Horo, John C. Gores, Gregory J. Williams, Amy W. Badley, Andrew D. Halamka, John Virk, Abinash Swift, Melanie D. Wagner, Tyler Soundararajan, Venky |
author_facet | Corchado-Garcia, Juan Zemmour, David Hughes, Travis Bandi, Hari Cristea-Platon, Tudor Lenehan, Patrick Pawlowski, Colin Bade, Sairam O’Horo, John C. Gores, Gregory J. Williams, Amy W. Badley, Andrew D. Halamka, John Virk, Abinash Swift, Melanie D. Wagner, Tyler Soundararajan, Venky |
author_sort | Corchado-Garcia, Juan |
collection | PubMed |
description | IMPORTANCE: Continuous assessment of the effectiveness and safety of the US Food and Drug Administration–authorized SARS-CoV-2 vaccines is critical to amplify transparency, build public trust, and ultimately improve overall health outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of the Johnson & Johnson Ad26.COV2.S vaccine for preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This comparative effectiveness research study used large-scale longitudinal curation of electronic health records from the multistate Mayo Clinic Health System (Minnesota, Arizona, Florida, Wisconsin, and Iowa) to identify vaccinated and unvaccinated adults between February 27 and July 22, 2021. The unvaccinated cohort was matched on a propensity score derived from age, sex, zip code, race, ethnicity, and previous number of SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction tests. The final study cohort consisted of 8889 patients in the vaccinated group and 88 898 unvaccinated matched patients. EXPOSURE: Single dose of the Ad26.COV2.S vaccine. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The incidence rate ratio of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the vaccinated vs unvaccinated control cohorts, measured by SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction testing. RESULTS: The study was composed of 8889 vaccinated patients (4491 men [50.5%]; mean [SD] age, 52.4 [16.9] years) and 88 898 unvaccinated patients (44 748 men [50.3%]; mean [SD] age, 51.7 [16.7] years). The incidence rate ratio of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the vaccinated vs unvaccinated control cohorts was 0.26 (95% CI, 0.20-0.34) (60 of 8889 vaccinated patients vs 2236 of 88 898 unvaccinated individuals), which corresponds to an effectiveness of 73.6% (95% CI, 65.9%-79.9%) and a 3.73-fold reduction in SARS-CoV-2 infections. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study’s findings are consistent with the clinical trial–reported efficacy of Ad26.COV2.S and the first retrospective analysis, suggesting that the vaccine is effective at reducing SARS-CoV-2 infection, even with the spread of variants such as Alpha or Delta that were not present in the original studies, and reaffirm the urgent need to continue mass vaccination efforts globally. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8564583 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | American Medical Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85645832021-11-15 Analysis of the Effectiveness of the Ad26.COV2.S Adenoviral Vector Vaccine for Preventing COVID-19 Corchado-Garcia, Juan Zemmour, David Hughes, Travis Bandi, Hari Cristea-Platon, Tudor Lenehan, Patrick Pawlowski, Colin Bade, Sairam O’Horo, John C. Gores, Gregory J. Williams, Amy W. Badley, Andrew D. Halamka, John Virk, Abinash Swift, Melanie D. Wagner, Tyler Soundararajan, Venky JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Continuous assessment of the effectiveness and safety of the US Food and Drug Administration–authorized SARS-CoV-2 vaccines is critical to amplify transparency, build public trust, and ultimately improve overall health outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of the Johnson & Johnson Ad26.COV2.S vaccine for preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This comparative effectiveness research study used large-scale longitudinal curation of electronic health records from the multistate Mayo Clinic Health System (Minnesota, Arizona, Florida, Wisconsin, and Iowa) to identify vaccinated and unvaccinated adults between February 27 and July 22, 2021. The unvaccinated cohort was matched on a propensity score derived from age, sex, zip code, race, ethnicity, and previous number of SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction tests. The final study cohort consisted of 8889 patients in the vaccinated group and 88 898 unvaccinated matched patients. EXPOSURE: Single dose of the Ad26.COV2.S vaccine. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The incidence rate ratio of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the vaccinated vs unvaccinated control cohorts, measured by SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction testing. RESULTS: The study was composed of 8889 vaccinated patients (4491 men [50.5%]; mean [SD] age, 52.4 [16.9] years) and 88 898 unvaccinated patients (44 748 men [50.3%]; mean [SD] age, 51.7 [16.7] years). The incidence rate ratio of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the vaccinated vs unvaccinated control cohorts was 0.26 (95% CI, 0.20-0.34) (60 of 8889 vaccinated patients vs 2236 of 88 898 unvaccinated individuals), which corresponds to an effectiveness of 73.6% (95% CI, 65.9%-79.9%) and a 3.73-fold reduction in SARS-CoV-2 infections. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study’s findings are consistent with the clinical trial–reported efficacy of Ad26.COV2.S and the first retrospective analysis, suggesting that the vaccine is effective at reducing SARS-CoV-2 infection, even with the spread of variants such as Alpha or Delta that were not present in the original studies, and reaffirm the urgent need to continue mass vaccination efforts globally. American Medical Association 2021-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8564583/ /pubmed/34726743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.32540 Text en Copyright 2021 Corchado-Garcia J et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND License. |
spellingShingle | Original Investigation Corchado-Garcia, Juan Zemmour, David Hughes, Travis Bandi, Hari Cristea-Platon, Tudor Lenehan, Patrick Pawlowski, Colin Bade, Sairam O’Horo, John C. Gores, Gregory J. Williams, Amy W. Badley, Andrew D. Halamka, John Virk, Abinash Swift, Melanie D. Wagner, Tyler Soundararajan, Venky Analysis of the Effectiveness of the Ad26.COV2.S Adenoviral Vector Vaccine for Preventing COVID-19 |
title | Analysis of the Effectiveness of the Ad26.COV2.S Adenoviral Vector Vaccine for Preventing COVID-19 |
title_full | Analysis of the Effectiveness of the Ad26.COV2.S Adenoviral Vector Vaccine for Preventing COVID-19 |
title_fullStr | Analysis of the Effectiveness of the Ad26.COV2.S Adenoviral Vector Vaccine for Preventing COVID-19 |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of the Effectiveness of the Ad26.COV2.S Adenoviral Vector Vaccine for Preventing COVID-19 |
title_short | Analysis of the Effectiveness of the Ad26.COV2.S Adenoviral Vector Vaccine for Preventing COVID-19 |
title_sort | analysis of the effectiveness of the ad26.cov2.s adenoviral vector vaccine for preventing covid-19 |
topic | Original Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8564583/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34726743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.32540 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT corchadogarciajuan analysisoftheeffectivenessofthead26cov2sadenoviralvectorvaccineforpreventingcovid19 AT zemmourdavid analysisoftheeffectivenessofthead26cov2sadenoviralvectorvaccineforpreventingcovid19 AT hughestravis analysisoftheeffectivenessofthead26cov2sadenoviralvectorvaccineforpreventingcovid19 AT bandihari analysisoftheeffectivenessofthead26cov2sadenoviralvectorvaccineforpreventingcovid19 AT cristeaplatontudor analysisoftheeffectivenessofthead26cov2sadenoviralvectorvaccineforpreventingcovid19 AT lenehanpatrick analysisoftheeffectivenessofthead26cov2sadenoviralvectorvaccineforpreventingcovid19 AT pawlowskicolin analysisoftheeffectivenessofthead26cov2sadenoviralvectorvaccineforpreventingcovid19 AT badesairam analysisoftheeffectivenessofthead26cov2sadenoviralvectorvaccineforpreventingcovid19 AT ohorojohnc analysisoftheeffectivenessofthead26cov2sadenoviralvectorvaccineforpreventingcovid19 AT goresgregoryj analysisoftheeffectivenessofthead26cov2sadenoviralvectorvaccineforpreventingcovid19 AT williamsamyw analysisoftheeffectivenessofthead26cov2sadenoviralvectorvaccineforpreventingcovid19 AT badleyandrewd analysisoftheeffectivenessofthead26cov2sadenoviralvectorvaccineforpreventingcovid19 AT halamkajohn analysisoftheeffectivenessofthead26cov2sadenoviralvectorvaccineforpreventingcovid19 AT virkabinash analysisoftheeffectivenessofthead26cov2sadenoviralvectorvaccineforpreventingcovid19 AT swiftmelanied analysisoftheeffectivenessofthead26cov2sadenoviralvectorvaccineforpreventingcovid19 AT wagnertyler analysisoftheeffectivenessofthead26cov2sadenoviralvectorvaccineforpreventingcovid19 AT soundararajanvenky analysisoftheeffectivenessofthead26cov2sadenoviralvectorvaccineforpreventingcovid19 |