Cargando…

Healthworker preparedness for COVID-19 management and implementation experiences: a mixed methods study in Uganda’s refugee-hosting districts

BACKGROUND: The negative impact of COVID-19 on population health outcomes raises critical questions on health system preparedness and resilience, especially in resource-limited settings. This study examined healthworker preparedness for COVID-19 management and implementation experiences in Uganda’s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seruwagi, Gloria, Nakidde, Catherine, Otieno, Felix, Kayiwa, Joshua, Luswata, Brian, Lugada, Eric, Ochen, Eric Awich, Muhangi, Denis, Okot, Betty, Ddamulira, Dunstan, Masaba, Andrew, Lawoko, Stephen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8564594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34732235
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13031-021-00415-z
_version_ 1784593650198511616
author Seruwagi, Gloria
Nakidde, Catherine
Otieno, Felix
Kayiwa, Joshua
Luswata, Brian
Lugada, Eric
Ochen, Eric Awich
Muhangi, Denis
Okot, Betty
Ddamulira, Dunstan
Masaba, Andrew
Lawoko, Stephen
author_facet Seruwagi, Gloria
Nakidde, Catherine
Otieno, Felix
Kayiwa, Joshua
Luswata, Brian
Lugada, Eric
Ochen, Eric Awich
Muhangi, Denis
Okot, Betty
Ddamulira, Dunstan
Masaba, Andrew
Lawoko, Stephen
author_sort Seruwagi, Gloria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The negative impact of COVID-19 on population health outcomes raises critical questions on health system preparedness and resilience, especially in resource-limited settings. This study examined healthworker preparedness for COVID-19 management and implementation experiences in Uganda’s refugee-hosting districts. METHODS: A cross sectional, mixed-method descriptive study in 17 health facilities in 7 districts from 4 major regions. Total sample size was 485 including > 370 health care workers (HCWs). HCW knowledge, attitude and practices (KAP) was assessed by using a pre-validated questionnaire. The quantitative data was processed and analysed using SPSS 26, and statistical significance assumed at p < 0.05 for all statistical tests. Bloom's cutoff of 80% was used to determine threshold for sufficient knowledge level and practices with scores classified as high (80.0–100.0%), average (60.0–79.0%) and low (≤ 59.0%). HCW implementation experiences and key stakeholder opinions were further explored qualitatively using interviews which were audio-recorded, coded and thematically analysed. RESULTS: On average 71% of HCWs were knowledgeable on the various aspects of COVID-19, although there is a wide variation in knowledge. Awareness of symptoms ranked highest among 95% (p value < 0.0001) of HCWs while awareness of the criteria for intubation for COVID-19 patients ranked lowest with only 35% (p value < 0.0001). Variations were noted on falsehoods about COVID-19 causes, prevention and treatment across Central (p value < 0.0356) and West Nile (p value < 0.0161) regions. Protective practices include adequate ventilation, virtual meetings and HCW training. Deficient practices were around psychosocial and lifestyle support, remote working and contingency plans for HCW safety. The work environment has immensely changed with increased demands on the amount of work, skills and variation in nature of work. HCWs reported moderate control over their work environment but with a high level of support from supervisors (88%) and colleagues (93%). CONCLUSIONS: HCWs preparedness is inadequate in some aspects. Implementation of healthcare interventions is constrained by the complexity of Uganda’s health system design, top-down approach of the national response to COVID-19 and longstanding health system bottlenecks. We recommend continuous information sharing on COVID-19, a design review with capacity strengthening at all health facility levels and investing in community-facing strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8564594
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85645942021-11-03 Healthworker preparedness for COVID-19 management and implementation experiences: a mixed methods study in Uganda’s refugee-hosting districts Seruwagi, Gloria Nakidde, Catherine Otieno, Felix Kayiwa, Joshua Luswata, Brian Lugada, Eric Ochen, Eric Awich Muhangi, Denis Okot, Betty Ddamulira, Dunstan Masaba, Andrew Lawoko, Stephen Confl Health Research BACKGROUND: The negative impact of COVID-19 on population health outcomes raises critical questions on health system preparedness and resilience, especially in resource-limited settings. This study examined healthworker preparedness for COVID-19 management and implementation experiences in Uganda’s refugee-hosting districts. METHODS: A cross sectional, mixed-method descriptive study in 17 health facilities in 7 districts from 4 major regions. Total sample size was 485 including > 370 health care workers (HCWs). HCW knowledge, attitude and practices (KAP) was assessed by using a pre-validated questionnaire. The quantitative data was processed and analysed using SPSS 26, and statistical significance assumed at p < 0.05 for all statistical tests. Bloom's cutoff of 80% was used to determine threshold for sufficient knowledge level and practices with scores classified as high (80.0–100.0%), average (60.0–79.0%) and low (≤ 59.0%). HCW implementation experiences and key stakeholder opinions were further explored qualitatively using interviews which were audio-recorded, coded and thematically analysed. RESULTS: On average 71% of HCWs were knowledgeable on the various aspects of COVID-19, although there is a wide variation in knowledge. Awareness of symptoms ranked highest among 95% (p value < 0.0001) of HCWs while awareness of the criteria for intubation for COVID-19 patients ranked lowest with only 35% (p value < 0.0001). Variations were noted on falsehoods about COVID-19 causes, prevention and treatment across Central (p value < 0.0356) and West Nile (p value < 0.0161) regions. Protective practices include adequate ventilation, virtual meetings and HCW training. Deficient practices were around psychosocial and lifestyle support, remote working and contingency plans for HCW safety. The work environment has immensely changed with increased demands on the amount of work, skills and variation in nature of work. HCWs reported moderate control over their work environment but with a high level of support from supervisors (88%) and colleagues (93%). CONCLUSIONS: HCWs preparedness is inadequate in some aspects. Implementation of healthcare interventions is constrained by the complexity of Uganda’s health system design, top-down approach of the national response to COVID-19 and longstanding health system bottlenecks. We recommend continuous information sharing on COVID-19, a design review with capacity strengthening at all health facility levels and investing in community-facing strategies. BioMed Central 2021-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8564594/ /pubmed/34732235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13031-021-00415-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Seruwagi, Gloria
Nakidde, Catherine
Otieno, Felix
Kayiwa, Joshua
Luswata, Brian
Lugada, Eric
Ochen, Eric Awich
Muhangi, Denis
Okot, Betty
Ddamulira, Dunstan
Masaba, Andrew
Lawoko, Stephen
Healthworker preparedness for COVID-19 management and implementation experiences: a mixed methods study in Uganda’s refugee-hosting districts
title Healthworker preparedness for COVID-19 management and implementation experiences: a mixed methods study in Uganda’s refugee-hosting districts
title_full Healthworker preparedness for COVID-19 management and implementation experiences: a mixed methods study in Uganda’s refugee-hosting districts
title_fullStr Healthworker preparedness for COVID-19 management and implementation experiences: a mixed methods study in Uganda’s refugee-hosting districts
title_full_unstemmed Healthworker preparedness for COVID-19 management and implementation experiences: a mixed methods study in Uganda’s refugee-hosting districts
title_short Healthworker preparedness for COVID-19 management and implementation experiences: a mixed methods study in Uganda’s refugee-hosting districts
title_sort healthworker preparedness for covid-19 management and implementation experiences: a mixed methods study in uganda’s refugee-hosting districts
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8564594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34732235
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13031-021-00415-z
work_keys_str_mv AT seruwagigloria healthworkerpreparednessforcovid19managementandimplementationexperiencesamixedmethodsstudyinugandasrefugeehostingdistricts
AT nakiddecatherine healthworkerpreparednessforcovid19managementandimplementationexperiencesamixedmethodsstudyinugandasrefugeehostingdistricts
AT otienofelix healthworkerpreparednessforcovid19managementandimplementationexperiencesamixedmethodsstudyinugandasrefugeehostingdistricts
AT kayiwajoshua healthworkerpreparednessforcovid19managementandimplementationexperiencesamixedmethodsstudyinugandasrefugeehostingdistricts
AT luswatabrian healthworkerpreparednessforcovid19managementandimplementationexperiencesamixedmethodsstudyinugandasrefugeehostingdistricts
AT lugadaeric healthworkerpreparednessforcovid19managementandimplementationexperiencesamixedmethodsstudyinugandasrefugeehostingdistricts
AT ochenericawich healthworkerpreparednessforcovid19managementandimplementationexperiencesamixedmethodsstudyinugandasrefugeehostingdistricts
AT muhangidenis healthworkerpreparednessforcovid19managementandimplementationexperiencesamixedmethodsstudyinugandasrefugeehostingdistricts
AT okotbetty healthworkerpreparednessforcovid19managementandimplementationexperiencesamixedmethodsstudyinugandasrefugeehostingdistricts
AT ddamuliradunstan healthworkerpreparednessforcovid19managementandimplementationexperiencesamixedmethodsstudyinugandasrefugeehostingdistricts
AT masabaandrew healthworkerpreparednessforcovid19managementandimplementationexperiencesamixedmethodsstudyinugandasrefugeehostingdistricts
AT lawokostephen healthworkerpreparednessforcovid19managementandimplementationexperiencesamixedmethodsstudyinugandasrefugeehostingdistricts