Cargando…
Cheilectomy With or Without Cryopreserved Amniotic Membrane–Umbilical Cord Allograft for Hallux Rigidus
BACKGROUND: For hallux rigidus, dorsal cheilectomy remains a treatment option even with advances in interposition techniques and devices. Cheilectomy aims to alleviate dorsal impingement and improve pain and function as well as range of motion. Cryopreserved umbilical cord allograft, with properties...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8564935/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35097420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011420967999 |
_version_ | 1784593714683838464 |
---|---|
author | Galli, Sara Heintzman Ferguson, Chad M. Davis, W. Hodges Anderson, Robert Cohen, Bruce E. Jones, Carroll P. Odum, Susan Ellington, J. Kent |
author_facet | Galli, Sara Heintzman Ferguson, Chad M. Davis, W. Hodges Anderson, Robert Cohen, Bruce E. Jones, Carroll P. Odum, Susan Ellington, J. Kent |
author_sort | Galli, Sara Heintzman |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: For hallux rigidus, dorsal cheilectomy remains a treatment option even with advances in interposition techniques and devices. Cheilectomy aims to alleviate dorsal impingement and improve pain and function as well as range of motion. Cryopreserved umbilical cord allograft, with properties to mitigate inflammation and scar formation, has theoretical benefit for improving outcomes following cheilectomy. In this first prospective randomized and blinded cheilectomy study reported, we aimed to compare outcomes between cheilectomy alone and cheilectomy with umbilical cord allograft. METHODS: Patients were randomized to cheilectomy alone (CA) or cheilectomy with cryopreserved umbilical cord (ie, amniotic membrane–umbilical cord [AM-UC]). Patients were evaluated with American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS), Foot Function Index (FFI), and visual analog scale (VAS) pain outcomes collected preoperatively and at 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. In addition, radiographic range of motion data were collected using stress radiographs. Fifty-one patients (26 AM-UC, 25 CA) completed the study, with 5 bilateral surgeries in the AM-UC group and 2 in the CA group, totaling 31 and 27 feet, respectively. RESULTS: The AM-UC group had statistically significant improved AOFAS and FFI scores at 1 year compared with the CA group, but there was no difference at 6 months. There was no significant difference between groups for VAS-pain scores at any time point, but overall VAS-pain improved in both groups from preoperative values. There was no significant difference in range of motion (total arc) between groups and changes in range of motion (total arc) in both groups from preoperative to 1 year postoperative were small. CONCLUSION: We present the results of the first randomized and blinded prospective study of cheilectomy surgery patients. When appropriately selected, cheilectomy remains a good option for patients with symptomatic hallux rigidus. Cryopreserved umbilical cord is a potential adjuvant to cheilectomy, with 1-year results showing improvements in functional outcome scores. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective comparative study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8564935 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85649352022-01-28 Cheilectomy With or Without Cryopreserved Amniotic Membrane–Umbilical Cord Allograft for Hallux Rigidus Galli, Sara Heintzman Ferguson, Chad M. Davis, W. Hodges Anderson, Robert Cohen, Bruce E. Jones, Carroll P. Odum, Susan Ellington, J. Kent Foot Ankle Orthop Article BACKGROUND: For hallux rigidus, dorsal cheilectomy remains a treatment option even with advances in interposition techniques and devices. Cheilectomy aims to alleviate dorsal impingement and improve pain and function as well as range of motion. Cryopreserved umbilical cord allograft, with properties to mitigate inflammation and scar formation, has theoretical benefit for improving outcomes following cheilectomy. In this first prospective randomized and blinded cheilectomy study reported, we aimed to compare outcomes between cheilectomy alone and cheilectomy with umbilical cord allograft. METHODS: Patients were randomized to cheilectomy alone (CA) or cheilectomy with cryopreserved umbilical cord (ie, amniotic membrane–umbilical cord [AM-UC]). Patients were evaluated with American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS), Foot Function Index (FFI), and visual analog scale (VAS) pain outcomes collected preoperatively and at 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. In addition, radiographic range of motion data were collected using stress radiographs. Fifty-one patients (26 AM-UC, 25 CA) completed the study, with 5 bilateral surgeries in the AM-UC group and 2 in the CA group, totaling 31 and 27 feet, respectively. RESULTS: The AM-UC group had statistically significant improved AOFAS and FFI scores at 1 year compared with the CA group, but there was no difference at 6 months. There was no significant difference between groups for VAS-pain scores at any time point, but overall VAS-pain improved in both groups from preoperative values. There was no significant difference in range of motion (total arc) between groups and changes in range of motion (total arc) in both groups from preoperative to 1 year postoperative were small. CONCLUSION: We present the results of the first randomized and blinded prospective study of cheilectomy surgery patients. When appropriately selected, cheilectomy remains a good option for patients with symptomatic hallux rigidus. Cryopreserved umbilical cord is a potential adjuvant to cheilectomy, with 1-year results showing improvements in functional outcome scores. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective comparative study. SAGE Publications 2021-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8564935/ /pubmed/35097420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011420967999 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Article Galli, Sara Heintzman Ferguson, Chad M. Davis, W. Hodges Anderson, Robert Cohen, Bruce E. Jones, Carroll P. Odum, Susan Ellington, J. Kent Cheilectomy With or Without Cryopreserved Amniotic Membrane–Umbilical Cord Allograft for Hallux Rigidus |
title | Cheilectomy With or Without Cryopreserved Amniotic Membrane–Umbilical Cord Allograft for Hallux Rigidus |
title_full | Cheilectomy With or Without Cryopreserved Amniotic Membrane–Umbilical Cord Allograft for Hallux Rigidus |
title_fullStr | Cheilectomy With or Without Cryopreserved Amniotic Membrane–Umbilical Cord Allograft for Hallux Rigidus |
title_full_unstemmed | Cheilectomy With or Without Cryopreserved Amniotic Membrane–Umbilical Cord Allograft for Hallux Rigidus |
title_short | Cheilectomy With or Without Cryopreserved Amniotic Membrane–Umbilical Cord Allograft for Hallux Rigidus |
title_sort | cheilectomy with or without cryopreserved amniotic membrane–umbilical cord allograft for hallux rigidus |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8564935/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35097420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2473011420967999 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gallisaraheintzman cheilectomywithorwithoutcryopreservedamnioticmembraneumbilicalcordallograftforhalluxrigidus AT fergusonchadm cheilectomywithorwithoutcryopreservedamnioticmembraneumbilicalcordallograftforhalluxrigidus AT daviswhodges cheilectomywithorwithoutcryopreservedamnioticmembraneumbilicalcordallograftforhalluxrigidus AT andersonrobert cheilectomywithorwithoutcryopreservedamnioticmembraneumbilicalcordallograftforhalluxrigidus AT cohenbrucee cheilectomywithorwithoutcryopreservedamnioticmembraneumbilicalcordallograftforhalluxrigidus AT jonescarrollp cheilectomywithorwithoutcryopreservedamnioticmembraneumbilicalcordallograftforhalluxrigidus AT odumsusan cheilectomywithorwithoutcryopreservedamnioticmembraneumbilicalcordallograftforhalluxrigidus AT ellingtonjkent cheilectomywithorwithoutcryopreservedamnioticmembraneumbilicalcordallograftforhalluxrigidus |