Cargando…
Rationale and design of the 2 by 2 factorial design GnG-trial: a randomized phase-III study to compare two schedules of gemtuzumab ozogamicin as adjunct to intensive induction therapy and to compare double-blinded intensive postremission therapy with or without glasdegib in older patients with newly diagnosed AML
BACKGROUND: Overall survival remains poor in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with less than 10% being alive after 5 years. In recent studies, a significant improvement in event-free, relapse-free and overall survival was shown by adding gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO), a humanized antibo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8564967/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34732236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05703-w |
_version_ | 1784593721609682944 |
---|---|
author | Jaramillo, Sonia Krisam, Johannes Le Cornet, Lucian Kratzmann, Markus Baumann, Lukas Sauer, Tim Crysandt, Martina Rank, Andreas Behringer, Dirk Teichmann, Lino Görner, Martin Trappe, Ralf-Ulrich Röllig, Christoph Krause, Stefan Hanoun, Maher Hopfer, Olaf Held, Gerhard Buske, Sebastian Fransecky, Lars Kayser, Sabine Schliemann, Christoph Schaefer-Eckart, Kerstin Al-Fareh, Yousef Schubert, Jörg Geer, Thomas Kaufmann, Martin Brecht, Arne Niemann, Dirk Kieser, Meinhard Bornhäuser, Martin Platzbecker, Uwe Serve, Hubert Baldus, Claudia D. Müller-Tidow, Carsten Schlenk, Richard F. |
author_facet | Jaramillo, Sonia Krisam, Johannes Le Cornet, Lucian Kratzmann, Markus Baumann, Lukas Sauer, Tim Crysandt, Martina Rank, Andreas Behringer, Dirk Teichmann, Lino Görner, Martin Trappe, Ralf-Ulrich Röllig, Christoph Krause, Stefan Hanoun, Maher Hopfer, Olaf Held, Gerhard Buske, Sebastian Fransecky, Lars Kayser, Sabine Schliemann, Christoph Schaefer-Eckart, Kerstin Al-Fareh, Yousef Schubert, Jörg Geer, Thomas Kaufmann, Martin Brecht, Arne Niemann, Dirk Kieser, Meinhard Bornhäuser, Martin Platzbecker, Uwe Serve, Hubert Baldus, Claudia D. Müller-Tidow, Carsten Schlenk, Richard F. |
author_sort | Jaramillo, Sonia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Overall survival remains poor in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with less than 10% being alive after 5 years. In recent studies, a significant improvement in event-free, relapse-free and overall survival was shown by adding gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO), a humanized antibody-drug conjugate directed against CD33, to intensive induction therapy once or in a sequential dosing schedule. Glasdegib, the small-molecule inhibitor of smoothened (SMO), also showed improved overall survival in patients not eligible for intensive chemotherapy when combined with low-dose cytarabine compared to low-dose cytarabine alone. These findings warrant further investigations in the phase III GnG trial. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a randomized phase III trial with measurable residual disease (MRD) after induction therapy and event-free survival (EFS) as primary endpoints. The two research questions are addressed in a 2 by 2 factorial design. Patients age 60 years and older are upfront randomized 1:1 in one of the two induction arms: GO administered to intensive induction therapy on days 1,4, and 7 versus GO administered once on day 1 (GO-147 versus GO-1), and double-blinded 1:1 in one of the subsequent treatment arms glasdegib vs. placebo as adjunct to consolidation therapy and as single-agent maintenance therapy for six months. Chemotherapy backbone for induction therapy consists of standard 7 + 3 schedule with cytarabine 200 mg/m(2) continuously days 1 to 7, daunorubicin 60 mg/m(2) days 1, 2, and 3 and high-dose cytarabine (1 g/m(2), bi-daily, days 1, 2, and 3) for consolidation therapy. Addressing two primary endpoints, MRD-negativity after induction therapy and event-free survival (EFS), 252 evaluable patients are needed to reject each of the two null hypotheses at a two-sided significance level of 2.5% with a power of at least 85%. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval and approvals from the local and federal competent authorities were granted. Trial results will be reported via peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences and scientific meetings. TRIAL STATUS: Protocol version: 1st version 20.10.2020, no amendments yet. Study initiation on February 16, 2021. First patient was recruited on April 1st. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.govNCT04093505; EudraCT 2019-003913-32. Registered on October 30, 2018. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05703-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8564967 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85649672021-11-04 Rationale and design of the 2 by 2 factorial design GnG-trial: a randomized phase-III study to compare two schedules of gemtuzumab ozogamicin as adjunct to intensive induction therapy and to compare double-blinded intensive postremission therapy with or without glasdegib in older patients with newly diagnosed AML Jaramillo, Sonia Krisam, Johannes Le Cornet, Lucian Kratzmann, Markus Baumann, Lukas Sauer, Tim Crysandt, Martina Rank, Andreas Behringer, Dirk Teichmann, Lino Görner, Martin Trappe, Ralf-Ulrich Röllig, Christoph Krause, Stefan Hanoun, Maher Hopfer, Olaf Held, Gerhard Buske, Sebastian Fransecky, Lars Kayser, Sabine Schliemann, Christoph Schaefer-Eckart, Kerstin Al-Fareh, Yousef Schubert, Jörg Geer, Thomas Kaufmann, Martin Brecht, Arne Niemann, Dirk Kieser, Meinhard Bornhäuser, Martin Platzbecker, Uwe Serve, Hubert Baldus, Claudia D. Müller-Tidow, Carsten Schlenk, Richard F. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Overall survival remains poor in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with less than 10% being alive after 5 years. In recent studies, a significant improvement in event-free, relapse-free and overall survival was shown by adding gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO), a humanized antibody-drug conjugate directed against CD33, to intensive induction therapy once or in a sequential dosing schedule. Glasdegib, the small-molecule inhibitor of smoothened (SMO), also showed improved overall survival in patients not eligible for intensive chemotherapy when combined with low-dose cytarabine compared to low-dose cytarabine alone. These findings warrant further investigations in the phase III GnG trial. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a randomized phase III trial with measurable residual disease (MRD) after induction therapy and event-free survival (EFS) as primary endpoints. The two research questions are addressed in a 2 by 2 factorial design. Patients age 60 years and older are upfront randomized 1:1 in one of the two induction arms: GO administered to intensive induction therapy on days 1,4, and 7 versus GO administered once on day 1 (GO-147 versus GO-1), and double-blinded 1:1 in one of the subsequent treatment arms glasdegib vs. placebo as adjunct to consolidation therapy and as single-agent maintenance therapy for six months. Chemotherapy backbone for induction therapy consists of standard 7 + 3 schedule with cytarabine 200 mg/m(2) continuously days 1 to 7, daunorubicin 60 mg/m(2) days 1, 2, and 3 and high-dose cytarabine (1 g/m(2), bi-daily, days 1, 2, and 3) for consolidation therapy. Addressing two primary endpoints, MRD-negativity after induction therapy and event-free survival (EFS), 252 evaluable patients are needed to reject each of the two null hypotheses at a two-sided significance level of 2.5% with a power of at least 85%. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval and approvals from the local and federal competent authorities were granted. Trial results will be reported via peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences and scientific meetings. TRIAL STATUS: Protocol version: 1st version 20.10.2020, no amendments yet. Study initiation on February 16, 2021. First patient was recruited on April 1st. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.govNCT04093505; EudraCT 2019-003913-32. Registered on October 30, 2018. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05703-w. BioMed Central 2021-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8564967/ /pubmed/34732236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05703-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Jaramillo, Sonia Krisam, Johannes Le Cornet, Lucian Kratzmann, Markus Baumann, Lukas Sauer, Tim Crysandt, Martina Rank, Andreas Behringer, Dirk Teichmann, Lino Görner, Martin Trappe, Ralf-Ulrich Röllig, Christoph Krause, Stefan Hanoun, Maher Hopfer, Olaf Held, Gerhard Buske, Sebastian Fransecky, Lars Kayser, Sabine Schliemann, Christoph Schaefer-Eckart, Kerstin Al-Fareh, Yousef Schubert, Jörg Geer, Thomas Kaufmann, Martin Brecht, Arne Niemann, Dirk Kieser, Meinhard Bornhäuser, Martin Platzbecker, Uwe Serve, Hubert Baldus, Claudia D. Müller-Tidow, Carsten Schlenk, Richard F. Rationale and design of the 2 by 2 factorial design GnG-trial: a randomized phase-III study to compare two schedules of gemtuzumab ozogamicin as adjunct to intensive induction therapy and to compare double-blinded intensive postremission therapy with or without glasdegib in older patients with newly diagnosed AML |
title | Rationale and design of the 2 by 2 factorial design GnG-trial: a randomized phase-III study to compare two schedules of gemtuzumab ozogamicin as adjunct to intensive induction therapy and to compare double-blinded intensive postremission therapy with or without glasdegib in older patients with newly diagnosed AML |
title_full | Rationale and design of the 2 by 2 factorial design GnG-trial: a randomized phase-III study to compare two schedules of gemtuzumab ozogamicin as adjunct to intensive induction therapy and to compare double-blinded intensive postremission therapy with or without glasdegib in older patients with newly diagnosed AML |
title_fullStr | Rationale and design of the 2 by 2 factorial design GnG-trial: a randomized phase-III study to compare two schedules of gemtuzumab ozogamicin as adjunct to intensive induction therapy and to compare double-blinded intensive postremission therapy with or without glasdegib in older patients with newly diagnosed AML |
title_full_unstemmed | Rationale and design of the 2 by 2 factorial design GnG-trial: a randomized phase-III study to compare two schedules of gemtuzumab ozogamicin as adjunct to intensive induction therapy and to compare double-blinded intensive postremission therapy with or without glasdegib in older patients with newly diagnosed AML |
title_short | Rationale and design of the 2 by 2 factorial design GnG-trial: a randomized phase-III study to compare two schedules of gemtuzumab ozogamicin as adjunct to intensive induction therapy and to compare double-blinded intensive postremission therapy with or without glasdegib in older patients with newly diagnosed AML |
title_sort | rationale and design of the 2 by 2 factorial design gng-trial: a randomized phase-iii study to compare two schedules of gemtuzumab ozogamicin as adjunct to intensive induction therapy and to compare double-blinded intensive postremission therapy with or without glasdegib in older patients with newly diagnosed aml |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8564967/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34732236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05703-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jaramillosonia rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi AT krisamjohannes rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi AT lecornetlucian rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi AT kratzmannmarkus rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi AT baumannlukas rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi AT sauertim rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi AT crysandtmartina rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi AT rankandreas rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi AT behringerdirk rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi AT teichmannlino rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi AT gornermartin rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi AT trapperalfulrich rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi AT rolligchristoph rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi AT krausestefan rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi AT hanounmaher rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi AT hopferolaf rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi AT heldgerhard rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi AT buskesebastian rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi AT franseckylars rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi AT kaysersabine rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi AT schliemannchristoph rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi AT schaefereckartkerstin rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi AT alfarehyousef rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi AT schubertjorg rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi AT geerthomas rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi AT kaufmannmartin rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi AT brechtarne rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi AT niemanndirk rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi AT kiesermeinhard rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi AT bornhausermartin rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi AT platzbeckeruwe rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi AT servehubert rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi AT baldusclaudiad rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi AT mullertidowcarsten rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi AT schlenkrichardf rationaleanddesignofthe2by2factorialdesigngngtrialarandomizedphaseiiistudytocomparetwoschedulesofgemtuzumabozogamicinasadjuncttointensiveinductiontherapyandtocomparedoubleblindedintensivepostremissiontherapywithorwithoutglasdegibinolderpatientswithnewlydi |