Cargando…
Association of baseline neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio with response to nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma
BACKGROUND: The identification of biomarkers to select patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) most likely to respond to combination immunotherapy (IO) is needed. We sought to investigate an association of the baseline neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER) with outcomes to nivolumab plus...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8564988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34732251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40364-021-00334-4 |
_version_ | 1784593725824958464 |
---|---|
author | Tucker, Matthew D. Brown, Landon C. Chen, Yu-Wei Kao, Chester Hirshman, Nathan Kinsey, Emily N. Ancell, Kristin K. Beckermann, Kathryn E. Davis, Nancy B. McAlister, Renee Schaffer, Kerry Armstrong, Andrew J. Harrison, Michael R. George, Daniel J. Rathmell, W. Kimryn Rini, Brian I. Zhang, Tian |
author_facet | Tucker, Matthew D. Brown, Landon C. Chen, Yu-Wei Kao, Chester Hirshman, Nathan Kinsey, Emily N. Ancell, Kristin K. Beckermann, Kathryn E. Davis, Nancy B. McAlister, Renee Schaffer, Kerry Armstrong, Andrew J. Harrison, Michael R. George, Daniel J. Rathmell, W. Kimryn Rini, Brian I. Zhang, Tian |
author_sort | Tucker, Matthew D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The identification of biomarkers to select patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) most likely to respond to combination immunotherapy (IO) is needed. We sought to investigate an association of the baseline neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER) with outcomes to nivolumab plus ipilimumab for patients with mRCC. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients with clear cell mRCC treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab from Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center and Duke Cancer Institute. Patients with prior receipt of immunotherapy and those without available baseline complete blood count with differential were excluded. Patients were divided into groups by the median baseline NER and analyzed for overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR). Patients were also divided by median baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and analyzed for clinical outcome. Further analyses of patients above/below the median NER and NLR were performed in subgroups of IMDC intermediate/poor risk, IMDC favorable risk, and treatment naïve patients. RESULTS: A total of 110 patients were included: median age was 61 years and 75% were treatment naïve. The median NER (mNER) at baseline was 26.4. The ORR was 40% for patients with <mNER compared to 21.8% among patients with >mNER (OR 2.39, p = 0.04). The median PFS for patients with <mNER was significantly longer at 8.6 months (mo) compared to 3.2 mo for patients with >mNER (HR 0.50, p < 0.01). Median OS was not reached (NR) for patients with <mNER compared with 27.3 mo for patients with >mNER (HR 0.31, p < 0.01). The median NLR (mNLR) was 3.42. While patients with <mNLR showed improvement in OS (HR 0.42, p = 0.02), PFS and ORR did not differ compared with patients in the >mNLR group. CONCLUSIONS: A lower baseline NER was associated with improved clinical outcomes (PFS, OS, and ORR) in patients with mRCC treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab, and prospective validation of the baseline NER as a predictive biomarker for response to immunotherapy-based combinations in mRCC is warranted. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40364-021-00334-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8564988 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85649882021-11-04 Association of baseline neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio with response to nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma Tucker, Matthew D. Brown, Landon C. Chen, Yu-Wei Kao, Chester Hirshman, Nathan Kinsey, Emily N. Ancell, Kristin K. Beckermann, Kathryn E. Davis, Nancy B. McAlister, Renee Schaffer, Kerry Armstrong, Andrew J. Harrison, Michael R. George, Daniel J. Rathmell, W. Kimryn Rini, Brian I. Zhang, Tian Biomark Res Research BACKGROUND: The identification of biomarkers to select patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) most likely to respond to combination immunotherapy (IO) is needed. We sought to investigate an association of the baseline neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER) with outcomes to nivolumab plus ipilimumab for patients with mRCC. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients with clear cell mRCC treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab from Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center and Duke Cancer Institute. Patients with prior receipt of immunotherapy and those without available baseline complete blood count with differential were excluded. Patients were divided into groups by the median baseline NER and analyzed for overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR). Patients were also divided by median baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and analyzed for clinical outcome. Further analyses of patients above/below the median NER and NLR were performed in subgroups of IMDC intermediate/poor risk, IMDC favorable risk, and treatment naïve patients. RESULTS: A total of 110 patients were included: median age was 61 years and 75% were treatment naïve. The median NER (mNER) at baseline was 26.4. The ORR was 40% for patients with <mNER compared to 21.8% among patients with >mNER (OR 2.39, p = 0.04). The median PFS for patients with <mNER was significantly longer at 8.6 months (mo) compared to 3.2 mo for patients with >mNER (HR 0.50, p < 0.01). Median OS was not reached (NR) for patients with <mNER compared with 27.3 mo for patients with >mNER (HR 0.31, p < 0.01). The median NLR (mNLR) was 3.42. While patients with <mNLR showed improvement in OS (HR 0.42, p = 0.02), PFS and ORR did not differ compared with patients in the >mNLR group. CONCLUSIONS: A lower baseline NER was associated with improved clinical outcomes (PFS, OS, and ORR) in patients with mRCC treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab, and prospective validation of the baseline NER as a predictive biomarker for response to immunotherapy-based combinations in mRCC is warranted. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40364-021-00334-4. BioMed Central 2021-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8564988/ /pubmed/34732251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40364-021-00334-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Tucker, Matthew D. Brown, Landon C. Chen, Yu-Wei Kao, Chester Hirshman, Nathan Kinsey, Emily N. Ancell, Kristin K. Beckermann, Kathryn E. Davis, Nancy B. McAlister, Renee Schaffer, Kerry Armstrong, Andrew J. Harrison, Michael R. George, Daniel J. Rathmell, W. Kimryn Rini, Brian I. Zhang, Tian Association of baseline neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio with response to nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma |
title | Association of baseline neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio with response to nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma |
title_full | Association of baseline neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio with response to nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma |
title_fullStr | Association of baseline neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio with response to nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Association of baseline neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio with response to nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma |
title_short | Association of baseline neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio with response to nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma |
title_sort | association of baseline neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio with response to nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8564988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34732251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40364-021-00334-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tuckermatthewd associationofbaselineneutrophiltoeosinophilratiowithresponsetonivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmetastaticrenalcellcarcinoma AT brownlandonc associationofbaselineneutrophiltoeosinophilratiowithresponsetonivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmetastaticrenalcellcarcinoma AT chenyuwei associationofbaselineneutrophiltoeosinophilratiowithresponsetonivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmetastaticrenalcellcarcinoma AT kaochester associationofbaselineneutrophiltoeosinophilratiowithresponsetonivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmetastaticrenalcellcarcinoma AT hirshmannathan associationofbaselineneutrophiltoeosinophilratiowithresponsetonivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmetastaticrenalcellcarcinoma AT kinseyemilyn associationofbaselineneutrophiltoeosinophilratiowithresponsetonivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmetastaticrenalcellcarcinoma AT ancellkristink associationofbaselineneutrophiltoeosinophilratiowithresponsetonivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmetastaticrenalcellcarcinoma AT beckermannkathryne associationofbaselineneutrophiltoeosinophilratiowithresponsetonivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmetastaticrenalcellcarcinoma AT davisnancyb associationofbaselineneutrophiltoeosinophilratiowithresponsetonivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmetastaticrenalcellcarcinoma AT mcalisterrenee associationofbaselineneutrophiltoeosinophilratiowithresponsetonivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmetastaticrenalcellcarcinoma AT schafferkerry associationofbaselineneutrophiltoeosinophilratiowithresponsetonivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmetastaticrenalcellcarcinoma AT armstrongandrewj associationofbaselineneutrophiltoeosinophilratiowithresponsetonivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmetastaticrenalcellcarcinoma AT harrisonmichaelr associationofbaselineneutrophiltoeosinophilratiowithresponsetonivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmetastaticrenalcellcarcinoma AT georgedanielj associationofbaselineneutrophiltoeosinophilratiowithresponsetonivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmetastaticrenalcellcarcinoma AT rathmellwkimryn associationofbaselineneutrophiltoeosinophilratiowithresponsetonivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmetastaticrenalcellcarcinoma AT rinibriani associationofbaselineneutrophiltoeosinophilratiowithresponsetonivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmetastaticrenalcellcarcinoma AT zhangtian associationofbaselineneutrophiltoeosinophilratiowithresponsetonivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmetastaticrenalcellcarcinoma |