Cargando…

Association of baseline neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio with response to nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The identification of biomarkers to select patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) most likely to respond to combination immunotherapy (IO) is needed. We sought to investigate an association of the baseline neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER) with outcomes to nivolumab plus...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tucker, Matthew D., Brown, Landon C., Chen, Yu-Wei, Kao, Chester, Hirshman, Nathan, Kinsey, Emily N., Ancell, Kristin K., Beckermann, Kathryn E., Davis, Nancy B., McAlister, Renee, Schaffer, Kerry, Armstrong, Andrew J., Harrison, Michael R., George, Daniel J., Rathmell, W. Kimryn, Rini, Brian I., Zhang, Tian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8564988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34732251
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40364-021-00334-4
_version_ 1784593725824958464
author Tucker, Matthew D.
Brown, Landon C.
Chen, Yu-Wei
Kao, Chester
Hirshman, Nathan
Kinsey, Emily N.
Ancell, Kristin K.
Beckermann, Kathryn E.
Davis, Nancy B.
McAlister, Renee
Schaffer, Kerry
Armstrong, Andrew J.
Harrison, Michael R.
George, Daniel J.
Rathmell, W. Kimryn
Rini, Brian I.
Zhang, Tian
author_facet Tucker, Matthew D.
Brown, Landon C.
Chen, Yu-Wei
Kao, Chester
Hirshman, Nathan
Kinsey, Emily N.
Ancell, Kristin K.
Beckermann, Kathryn E.
Davis, Nancy B.
McAlister, Renee
Schaffer, Kerry
Armstrong, Andrew J.
Harrison, Michael R.
George, Daniel J.
Rathmell, W. Kimryn
Rini, Brian I.
Zhang, Tian
author_sort Tucker, Matthew D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The identification of biomarkers to select patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) most likely to respond to combination immunotherapy (IO) is needed. We sought to investigate an association of the baseline neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER) with outcomes to nivolumab plus ipilimumab for patients with mRCC. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients with clear cell mRCC treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab from Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center and Duke Cancer Institute. Patients with prior receipt of immunotherapy and those without available baseline complete blood count with differential were excluded. Patients were divided into groups by the median baseline NER and analyzed for overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR). Patients were also divided by median baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and analyzed for clinical outcome. Further analyses of patients above/below the median NER and NLR were performed in subgroups of IMDC intermediate/poor risk, IMDC favorable risk, and treatment naïve patients. RESULTS: A total of 110 patients were included: median age was 61 years and 75% were treatment naïve. The median NER (mNER) at baseline was 26.4. The ORR was 40% for patients with <mNER compared to 21.8% among patients with >mNER (OR 2.39, p = 0.04). The median PFS for patients with <mNER was significantly longer at 8.6 months (mo) compared to 3.2 mo for patients with >mNER (HR 0.50, p < 0.01). Median OS was not reached (NR) for patients with <mNER compared with 27.3 mo for patients with >mNER (HR 0.31, p < 0.01). The median NLR (mNLR) was 3.42. While patients with <mNLR showed improvement in OS (HR 0.42, p = 0.02), PFS and ORR did not differ compared with patients in the >mNLR group. CONCLUSIONS: A lower baseline NER was associated with improved clinical outcomes (PFS, OS, and ORR) in patients with mRCC treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab, and prospective validation of the baseline NER as a predictive biomarker for response to immunotherapy-based combinations in mRCC is warranted. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40364-021-00334-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8564988
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85649882021-11-04 Association of baseline neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio with response to nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma Tucker, Matthew D. Brown, Landon C. Chen, Yu-Wei Kao, Chester Hirshman, Nathan Kinsey, Emily N. Ancell, Kristin K. Beckermann, Kathryn E. Davis, Nancy B. McAlister, Renee Schaffer, Kerry Armstrong, Andrew J. Harrison, Michael R. George, Daniel J. Rathmell, W. Kimryn Rini, Brian I. Zhang, Tian Biomark Res Research BACKGROUND: The identification of biomarkers to select patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) most likely to respond to combination immunotherapy (IO) is needed. We sought to investigate an association of the baseline neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER) with outcomes to nivolumab plus ipilimumab for patients with mRCC. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients with clear cell mRCC treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab from Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center and Duke Cancer Institute. Patients with prior receipt of immunotherapy and those without available baseline complete blood count with differential were excluded. Patients were divided into groups by the median baseline NER and analyzed for overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR). Patients were also divided by median baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and analyzed for clinical outcome. Further analyses of patients above/below the median NER and NLR were performed in subgroups of IMDC intermediate/poor risk, IMDC favorable risk, and treatment naïve patients. RESULTS: A total of 110 patients were included: median age was 61 years and 75% were treatment naïve. The median NER (mNER) at baseline was 26.4. The ORR was 40% for patients with <mNER compared to 21.8% among patients with >mNER (OR 2.39, p = 0.04). The median PFS for patients with <mNER was significantly longer at 8.6 months (mo) compared to 3.2 mo for patients with >mNER (HR 0.50, p < 0.01). Median OS was not reached (NR) for patients with <mNER compared with 27.3 mo for patients with >mNER (HR 0.31, p < 0.01). The median NLR (mNLR) was 3.42. While patients with <mNLR showed improvement in OS (HR 0.42, p = 0.02), PFS and ORR did not differ compared with patients in the >mNLR group. CONCLUSIONS: A lower baseline NER was associated with improved clinical outcomes (PFS, OS, and ORR) in patients with mRCC treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab, and prospective validation of the baseline NER as a predictive biomarker for response to immunotherapy-based combinations in mRCC is warranted. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40364-021-00334-4. BioMed Central 2021-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8564988/ /pubmed/34732251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40364-021-00334-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Tucker, Matthew D.
Brown, Landon C.
Chen, Yu-Wei
Kao, Chester
Hirshman, Nathan
Kinsey, Emily N.
Ancell, Kristin K.
Beckermann, Kathryn E.
Davis, Nancy B.
McAlister, Renee
Schaffer, Kerry
Armstrong, Andrew J.
Harrison, Michael R.
George, Daniel J.
Rathmell, W. Kimryn
Rini, Brian I.
Zhang, Tian
Association of baseline neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio with response to nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma
title Association of baseline neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio with response to nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma
title_full Association of baseline neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio with response to nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma
title_fullStr Association of baseline neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio with response to nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Association of baseline neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio with response to nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma
title_short Association of baseline neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio with response to nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma
title_sort association of baseline neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio with response to nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8564988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34732251
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40364-021-00334-4
work_keys_str_mv AT tuckermatthewd associationofbaselineneutrophiltoeosinophilratiowithresponsetonivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmetastaticrenalcellcarcinoma
AT brownlandonc associationofbaselineneutrophiltoeosinophilratiowithresponsetonivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmetastaticrenalcellcarcinoma
AT chenyuwei associationofbaselineneutrophiltoeosinophilratiowithresponsetonivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmetastaticrenalcellcarcinoma
AT kaochester associationofbaselineneutrophiltoeosinophilratiowithresponsetonivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmetastaticrenalcellcarcinoma
AT hirshmannathan associationofbaselineneutrophiltoeosinophilratiowithresponsetonivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmetastaticrenalcellcarcinoma
AT kinseyemilyn associationofbaselineneutrophiltoeosinophilratiowithresponsetonivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmetastaticrenalcellcarcinoma
AT ancellkristink associationofbaselineneutrophiltoeosinophilratiowithresponsetonivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmetastaticrenalcellcarcinoma
AT beckermannkathryne associationofbaselineneutrophiltoeosinophilratiowithresponsetonivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmetastaticrenalcellcarcinoma
AT davisnancyb associationofbaselineneutrophiltoeosinophilratiowithresponsetonivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmetastaticrenalcellcarcinoma
AT mcalisterrenee associationofbaselineneutrophiltoeosinophilratiowithresponsetonivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmetastaticrenalcellcarcinoma
AT schafferkerry associationofbaselineneutrophiltoeosinophilratiowithresponsetonivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmetastaticrenalcellcarcinoma
AT armstrongandrewj associationofbaselineneutrophiltoeosinophilratiowithresponsetonivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmetastaticrenalcellcarcinoma
AT harrisonmichaelr associationofbaselineneutrophiltoeosinophilratiowithresponsetonivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmetastaticrenalcellcarcinoma
AT georgedanielj associationofbaselineneutrophiltoeosinophilratiowithresponsetonivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmetastaticrenalcellcarcinoma
AT rathmellwkimryn associationofbaselineneutrophiltoeosinophilratiowithresponsetonivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmetastaticrenalcellcarcinoma
AT rinibriani associationofbaselineneutrophiltoeosinophilratiowithresponsetonivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmetastaticrenalcellcarcinoma
AT zhangtian associationofbaselineneutrophiltoeosinophilratiowithresponsetonivolumabplusipilimumabinpatientswithmetastaticrenalcellcarcinoma