Cargando…

Mapping conflict of interests: scoping review

OBJECTIVE: To identify all known ties between the medical product industry and the healthcare ecosystem. DESIGN: Scoping review. METHODS: From initial literature searches and expert input, a map was created to show the network of medical product industry ties across parties and activities in the hea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chimonas, Susan, Mamoor, Maha, Zimbalist, Sophia A, Barrow, Brooke, Bach, Peter B, Korenstein, Deborah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8565086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34732464
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-066576
_version_ 1784593746824790016
author Chimonas, Susan
Mamoor, Maha
Zimbalist, Sophia A
Barrow, Brooke
Bach, Peter B
Korenstein, Deborah
author_facet Chimonas, Susan
Mamoor, Maha
Zimbalist, Sophia A
Barrow, Brooke
Bach, Peter B
Korenstein, Deborah
author_sort Chimonas, Susan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To identify all known ties between the medical product industry and the healthcare ecosystem. DESIGN: Scoping review. METHODS: From initial literature searches and expert input, a map was created to show the network of medical product industry ties across parties and activities in the healthcare ecosystem. Through a scoping review, the ties were then verified, cataloged, and characterized, with data abstracted on types of industry ties (financial, non-financial), applicable policies for conflict of interests, and publicly available data sources. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Presence and types of medical product industry ties to activities and parties, presence of policies for conflict of interests, and publicly available data. RESULTS: A map derived through synthesis of 538 articles from 37 countries shows an extensive network of medical product industry ties to activities and parties in the healthcare ecosystem. Key activities include research, healthcare education, guideline development, formulary selection, and clinical care. Parties include non-profit entities, the healthcare profession, the market supply chain, and government. The medical product industry has direct ties to all parties and some activities through multiple pathways; direct ties extend through interrelationships among parties and activities. The most frequently identified parties were within the healthcare profession, with individual professionals described in 422 (78%) of the included studies. More than half (303, 56%) of the publications documented medical product industry ties to research, with clinical care (156, 29%), health professional education (145, 27%), guideline development (33, 6%), and formulary selection (8, 1%) appearing less often. Policies for conflict of interests exist for some financial and a few non-financial ties; publicly available data sources seldom describe or quantify these ties. CONCLUSIONS: An extensive network of medical product industry ties to activities and parties exists in the healthcare ecosystem. Policies for conflict of interests and publicly available data are lacking, suggesting that enhanced oversight and transparency are needed to protect patient care from commercial influence and to ensure public trust.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8565086
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85650862021-11-15 Mapping conflict of interests: scoping review Chimonas, Susan Mamoor, Maha Zimbalist, Sophia A Barrow, Brooke Bach, Peter B Korenstein, Deborah BMJ Research OBJECTIVE: To identify all known ties between the medical product industry and the healthcare ecosystem. DESIGN: Scoping review. METHODS: From initial literature searches and expert input, a map was created to show the network of medical product industry ties across parties and activities in the healthcare ecosystem. Through a scoping review, the ties were then verified, cataloged, and characterized, with data abstracted on types of industry ties (financial, non-financial), applicable policies for conflict of interests, and publicly available data sources. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Presence and types of medical product industry ties to activities and parties, presence of policies for conflict of interests, and publicly available data. RESULTS: A map derived through synthesis of 538 articles from 37 countries shows an extensive network of medical product industry ties to activities and parties in the healthcare ecosystem. Key activities include research, healthcare education, guideline development, formulary selection, and clinical care. Parties include non-profit entities, the healthcare profession, the market supply chain, and government. The medical product industry has direct ties to all parties and some activities through multiple pathways; direct ties extend through interrelationships among parties and activities. The most frequently identified parties were within the healthcare profession, with individual professionals described in 422 (78%) of the included studies. More than half (303, 56%) of the publications documented medical product industry ties to research, with clinical care (156, 29%), health professional education (145, 27%), guideline development (33, 6%), and formulary selection (8, 1%) appearing less often. Policies for conflict of interests exist for some financial and a few non-financial ties; publicly available data sources seldom describe or quantify these ties. CONCLUSIONS: An extensive network of medical product industry ties to activities and parties exists in the healthcare ecosystem. Policies for conflict of interests and publicly available data are lacking, suggesting that enhanced oversight and transparency are needed to protect patient care from commercial influence and to ensure public trust. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2021-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8565086/ /pubmed/34732464 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-066576 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Chimonas, Susan
Mamoor, Maha
Zimbalist, Sophia A
Barrow, Brooke
Bach, Peter B
Korenstein, Deborah
Mapping conflict of interests: scoping review
title Mapping conflict of interests: scoping review
title_full Mapping conflict of interests: scoping review
title_fullStr Mapping conflict of interests: scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Mapping conflict of interests: scoping review
title_short Mapping conflict of interests: scoping review
title_sort mapping conflict of interests: scoping review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8565086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34732464
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-066576
work_keys_str_mv AT chimonassusan mappingconflictofinterestsscopingreview
AT mamoormaha mappingconflictofinterestsscopingreview
AT zimbalistsophiaa mappingconflictofinterestsscopingreview
AT barrowbrooke mappingconflictofinterestsscopingreview
AT bachpeterb mappingconflictofinterestsscopingreview
AT korensteindeborah mappingconflictofinterestsscopingreview