Cargando…
Complications and Revision Rates in Minimally Invasive Robotic-Guided Versus Fluoroscopic-Guided Spinal Fusions: The MIS ReFRESH Prospective Comparative Study
STUDY DESIGN. Prospective, multicenter, partially randomized. OBJECTIVE. Assess rates of complications, revision surgery, and radiation between Mazor robotic-guidance (RG) and fluoro-guidance (FG). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA. Minimally invasive surgery MIS ReFRESH is the first study designed to comp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8565511/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33826591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004048 |
_version_ | 1784593833862889472 |
---|---|
author | Good, Christopher R. Orosz, Lindsay Schroerlucke, Samuel R. Cannestra, Andrew Lim, Jae Y. Hsu, Victor W. Zahrawi, Faissal Villalobos, Hunaldo J. Ramirez, Pedro M. Sweeney, Thomas Wang, Michael Y. |
author_facet | Good, Christopher R. Orosz, Lindsay Schroerlucke, Samuel R. Cannestra, Andrew Lim, Jae Y. Hsu, Victor W. Zahrawi, Faissal Villalobos, Hunaldo J. Ramirez, Pedro M. Sweeney, Thomas Wang, Michael Y. |
author_sort | Good, Christopher R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY DESIGN. Prospective, multicenter, partially randomized. OBJECTIVE. Assess rates of complications, revision surgery, and radiation between Mazor robotic-guidance (RG) and fluoro-guidance (FG). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA. Minimally invasive surgery MIS ReFRESH is the first study designed to compare RG and FG techniques in adult minimally invasive surgery (MIS) lumbar fusions. METHODS. Primary endpoints were analyzed at 1 year follow-up. Analysis of variables through Cox logistic regression and a Kaplan–Meier Survival Curve of surgical complications. RESULTS. Nine sites enrolled 485 patients: 374 (RG arm) and 111 (FG arm). 93.2% of patients had more than 1 year f/u. There were no differences for sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, diabetes, or tumor. Mean age of RG patients was 59.0 versus 62.5 for FG (P = 0.009) and body mass index (BMI) was 31.2 versus 28.1 (P< 0.001). Percentage of smokers was almost double in the RG (15.2% vs. 7.2%, P = 0.029). Surgical time was similar (skin-to-skin time/no. of screws) at 24.9 minutes RG and 22.9 FG (P = 0.550). Fluoroscopy during surgery/no. of screws was 15.5 seconds RG versus 35.4 seconds FG, (15 seconds average reduction). Fluoroscopy time during instrumentation/no. of screws was 3.6 seconds RG versus 17.8 seconds FG showing an 80% average reduction of fluoro time/screw in RG (P < 0.001). Within 1 year follow-up, there were 39 (10.4%) surgical complications RG versus 39 (35.1%) FG, and 8 (2.1%) revisions RG versus 7 (6.3%) FG. Cox regression analysis including age, sex, BMI, CCI, and no. of screws, demonstrated that the hazard ratio (HR) for complication was 5.8 times higher FG versus RG (95% CI: 3.5–9.6, P < 0.001). HR for revision surgery was 11.0 times higher FG versus RG cases (95% CI 2.9–41.2, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION. Mazor robotic-guidance was found to have a 5.8 times lower risk of a surgical complication and 11.0 times lower risk for revision surgery. Surgical time was similar between groups and robotic-guidance reduced fluoro time per screw by 80% (approximately 1 min/case). Level of Evidence: 2 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8565511 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85655112021-11-05 Complications and Revision Rates in Minimally Invasive Robotic-Guided Versus Fluoroscopic-Guided Spinal Fusions: The MIS ReFRESH Prospective Comparative Study Good, Christopher R. Orosz, Lindsay Schroerlucke, Samuel R. Cannestra, Andrew Lim, Jae Y. Hsu, Victor W. Zahrawi, Faissal Villalobos, Hunaldo J. Ramirez, Pedro M. Sweeney, Thomas Wang, Michael Y. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Surgery STUDY DESIGN. Prospective, multicenter, partially randomized. OBJECTIVE. Assess rates of complications, revision surgery, and radiation between Mazor robotic-guidance (RG) and fluoro-guidance (FG). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA. Minimally invasive surgery MIS ReFRESH is the first study designed to compare RG and FG techniques in adult minimally invasive surgery (MIS) lumbar fusions. METHODS. Primary endpoints were analyzed at 1 year follow-up. Analysis of variables through Cox logistic regression and a Kaplan–Meier Survival Curve of surgical complications. RESULTS. Nine sites enrolled 485 patients: 374 (RG arm) and 111 (FG arm). 93.2% of patients had more than 1 year f/u. There were no differences for sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, diabetes, or tumor. Mean age of RG patients was 59.0 versus 62.5 for FG (P = 0.009) and body mass index (BMI) was 31.2 versus 28.1 (P< 0.001). Percentage of smokers was almost double in the RG (15.2% vs. 7.2%, P = 0.029). Surgical time was similar (skin-to-skin time/no. of screws) at 24.9 minutes RG and 22.9 FG (P = 0.550). Fluoroscopy during surgery/no. of screws was 15.5 seconds RG versus 35.4 seconds FG, (15 seconds average reduction). Fluoroscopy time during instrumentation/no. of screws was 3.6 seconds RG versus 17.8 seconds FG showing an 80% average reduction of fluoro time/screw in RG (P < 0.001). Within 1 year follow-up, there were 39 (10.4%) surgical complications RG versus 39 (35.1%) FG, and 8 (2.1%) revisions RG versus 7 (6.3%) FG. Cox regression analysis including age, sex, BMI, CCI, and no. of screws, demonstrated that the hazard ratio (HR) for complication was 5.8 times higher FG versus RG (95% CI: 3.5–9.6, P < 0.001). HR for revision surgery was 11.0 times higher FG versus RG cases (95% CI 2.9–41.2, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION. Mazor robotic-guidance was found to have a 5.8 times lower risk of a surgical complication and 11.0 times lower risk for revision surgery. Surgical time was similar between groups and robotic-guidance reduced fluoro time per screw by 80% (approximately 1 min/case). Level of Evidence: 2 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-12-01 2021-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8565511/ /pubmed/33826591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004048 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Surgery Good, Christopher R. Orosz, Lindsay Schroerlucke, Samuel R. Cannestra, Andrew Lim, Jae Y. Hsu, Victor W. Zahrawi, Faissal Villalobos, Hunaldo J. Ramirez, Pedro M. Sweeney, Thomas Wang, Michael Y. Complications and Revision Rates in Minimally Invasive Robotic-Guided Versus Fluoroscopic-Guided Spinal Fusions: The MIS ReFRESH Prospective Comparative Study |
title | Complications and Revision Rates in Minimally Invasive Robotic-Guided Versus Fluoroscopic-Guided Spinal Fusions: The MIS ReFRESH Prospective Comparative Study |
title_full | Complications and Revision Rates in Minimally Invasive Robotic-Guided Versus Fluoroscopic-Guided Spinal Fusions: The MIS ReFRESH Prospective Comparative Study |
title_fullStr | Complications and Revision Rates in Minimally Invasive Robotic-Guided Versus Fluoroscopic-Guided Spinal Fusions: The MIS ReFRESH Prospective Comparative Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Complications and Revision Rates in Minimally Invasive Robotic-Guided Versus Fluoroscopic-Guided Spinal Fusions: The MIS ReFRESH Prospective Comparative Study |
title_short | Complications and Revision Rates in Minimally Invasive Robotic-Guided Versus Fluoroscopic-Guided Spinal Fusions: The MIS ReFRESH Prospective Comparative Study |
title_sort | complications and revision rates in minimally invasive robotic-guided versus fluoroscopic-guided spinal fusions: the mis refresh prospective comparative study |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8565511/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33826591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004048 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goodchristopherr complicationsandrevisionratesinminimallyinvasiveroboticguidedversusfluoroscopicguidedspinalfusionsthemisrefreshprospectivecomparativestudy AT oroszlindsay complicationsandrevisionratesinminimallyinvasiveroboticguidedversusfluoroscopicguidedspinalfusionsthemisrefreshprospectivecomparativestudy AT schroerluckesamuelr complicationsandrevisionratesinminimallyinvasiveroboticguidedversusfluoroscopicguidedspinalfusionsthemisrefreshprospectivecomparativestudy AT cannestraandrew complicationsandrevisionratesinminimallyinvasiveroboticguidedversusfluoroscopicguidedspinalfusionsthemisrefreshprospectivecomparativestudy AT limjaey complicationsandrevisionratesinminimallyinvasiveroboticguidedversusfluoroscopicguidedspinalfusionsthemisrefreshprospectivecomparativestudy AT hsuvictorw complicationsandrevisionratesinminimallyinvasiveroboticguidedversusfluoroscopicguidedspinalfusionsthemisrefreshprospectivecomparativestudy AT zahrawifaissal complicationsandrevisionratesinminimallyinvasiveroboticguidedversusfluoroscopicguidedspinalfusionsthemisrefreshprospectivecomparativestudy AT villaloboshunaldoj complicationsandrevisionratesinminimallyinvasiveroboticguidedversusfluoroscopicguidedspinalfusionsthemisrefreshprospectivecomparativestudy AT ramirezpedrom complicationsandrevisionratesinminimallyinvasiveroboticguidedversusfluoroscopicguidedspinalfusionsthemisrefreshprospectivecomparativestudy AT sweeneythomas complicationsandrevisionratesinminimallyinvasiveroboticguidedversusfluoroscopicguidedspinalfusionsthemisrefreshprospectivecomparativestudy AT wangmichaely complicationsandrevisionratesinminimallyinvasiveroboticguidedversusfluoroscopicguidedspinalfusionsthemisrefreshprospectivecomparativestudy |