Cargando…

Machine learning techniques for mortality prediction in emergency departments: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aimed to assess the performance and clinical feasibility of machine learning (ML) algorithms in prediction of in-hospital mortality for medical patients using vital signs at emergency departments (EDs). DESIGN: A systematic review was performed. SETTING: The databa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Naemi, Amin, Schmidt, Thomas, Mansourvar, Marjan, Naghavi-Behzad, Mohammad, Ebrahimi, Ali, Wiil, Uffe Kock
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8565537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34728454
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052663
_version_ 1784593839116255232
author Naemi, Amin
Schmidt, Thomas
Mansourvar, Marjan
Naghavi-Behzad, Mohammad
Ebrahimi, Ali
Wiil, Uffe Kock
author_facet Naemi, Amin
Schmidt, Thomas
Mansourvar, Marjan
Naghavi-Behzad, Mohammad
Ebrahimi, Ali
Wiil, Uffe Kock
author_sort Naemi, Amin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aimed to assess the performance and clinical feasibility of machine learning (ML) algorithms in prediction of in-hospital mortality for medical patients using vital signs at emergency departments (EDs). DESIGN: A systematic review was performed. SETTING: The databases including Medline (PubMed), Scopus and Embase (Ovid) were searched between 2010 and 2021, to extract published articles in English, describing ML-based models utilising vital sign variables to predict in-hospital mortality for patients admitted at EDs. Critical appraisal and data extraction for systematic reviews of prediction modelling studies checklist was used for study planning and data extraction. The risk of bias for included papers was assessed using the prediction risk of bias assessment tool. PARTICIPANTS: Admitted patients to the ED. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: In-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Fifteen articles were included in the final review. We found that eight models including logistic regression, decision tree, K-nearest neighbours, support vector machine, gradient boosting, random forest, artificial neural networks and deep neural networks have been applied in this domain. Most studies failed to report essential main analysis steps such as data preprocessing and handling missing values. Fourteen included studies had a high risk of bias in the statistical analysis part, which could lead to poor performance in practice. Although the main aim of all studies was developing a predictive model for mortality, nine articles did not provide a time horizon for the prediction. CONCLUSION: This review provided an updated overview of the state-of-the-art and revealed research gaps; based on these, we provide eight recommendations for future studies to make the use of ML more feasible in practice. By following these recommendations, we expect to see more robust ML models applied in the future to help clinicians identify patient deterioration earlier.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8565537
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85655372021-11-16 Machine learning techniques for mortality prediction in emergency departments: a systematic review Naemi, Amin Schmidt, Thomas Mansourvar, Marjan Naghavi-Behzad, Mohammad Ebrahimi, Ali Wiil, Uffe Kock BMJ Open Emergency Medicine OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aimed to assess the performance and clinical feasibility of machine learning (ML) algorithms in prediction of in-hospital mortality for medical patients using vital signs at emergency departments (EDs). DESIGN: A systematic review was performed. SETTING: The databases including Medline (PubMed), Scopus and Embase (Ovid) were searched between 2010 and 2021, to extract published articles in English, describing ML-based models utilising vital sign variables to predict in-hospital mortality for patients admitted at EDs. Critical appraisal and data extraction for systematic reviews of prediction modelling studies checklist was used for study planning and data extraction. The risk of bias for included papers was assessed using the prediction risk of bias assessment tool. PARTICIPANTS: Admitted patients to the ED. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: In-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Fifteen articles were included in the final review. We found that eight models including logistic regression, decision tree, K-nearest neighbours, support vector machine, gradient boosting, random forest, artificial neural networks and deep neural networks have been applied in this domain. Most studies failed to report essential main analysis steps such as data preprocessing and handling missing values. Fourteen included studies had a high risk of bias in the statistical analysis part, which could lead to poor performance in practice. Although the main aim of all studies was developing a predictive model for mortality, nine articles did not provide a time horizon for the prediction. CONCLUSION: This review provided an updated overview of the state-of-the-art and revealed research gaps; based on these, we provide eight recommendations for future studies to make the use of ML more feasible in practice. By following these recommendations, we expect to see more robust ML models applied in the future to help clinicians identify patient deterioration earlier. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8565537/ /pubmed/34728454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052663 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Emergency Medicine
Naemi, Amin
Schmidt, Thomas
Mansourvar, Marjan
Naghavi-Behzad, Mohammad
Ebrahimi, Ali
Wiil, Uffe Kock
Machine learning techniques for mortality prediction in emergency departments: a systematic review
title Machine learning techniques for mortality prediction in emergency departments: a systematic review
title_full Machine learning techniques for mortality prediction in emergency departments: a systematic review
title_fullStr Machine learning techniques for mortality prediction in emergency departments: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Machine learning techniques for mortality prediction in emergency departments: a systematic review
title_short Machine learning techniques for mortality prediction in emergency departments: a systematic review
title_sort machine learning techniques for mortality prediction in emergency departments: a systematic review
topic Emergency Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8565537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34728454
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052663
work_keys_str_mv AT naemiamin machinelearningtechniquesformortalitypredictioninemergencydepartmentsasystematicreview
AT schmidtthomas machinelearningtechniquesformortalitypredictioninemergencydepartmentsasystematicreview
AT mansourvarmarjan machinelearningtechniquesformortalitypredictioninemergencydepartmentsasystematicreview
AT naghavibehzadmohammad machinelearningtechniquesformortalitypredictioninemergencydepartmentsasystematicreview
AT ebrahimiali machinelearningtechniquesformortalitypredictioninemergencydepartmentsasystematicreview
AT wiiluffekock machinelearningtechniquesformortalitypredictioninemergencydepartmentsasystematicreview