Cargando…

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in randomised controlled trials in diabetes and pregnancy: protocol for a systematic review

INTRODUCTION: Diabetes mellitus is the most common metabolic complication of pregnancy and its prevalence worldwide is rising. The number of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) being conducted in people with diabetes is also increasing. Many studies preferentially publish findings on clinical endpoi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Newman, Christine, Kgosidialwa, Oratile, Dervan, Louise, Bogdanet, Delia, Egan, Aoife Maria, Biesty, Linda, Devane, Declan, O'Shea, Paula M, Dunne, Fidelma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8565541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34728453
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052506
_version_ 1784593839827189760
author Newman, Christine
Kgosidialwa, Oratile
Dervan, Louise
Bogdanet, Delia
Egan, Aoife Maria
Biesty, Linda
Devane, Declan
O'Shea, Paula M
Dunne, Fidelma
author_facet Newman, Christine
Kgosidialwa, Oratile
Dervan, Louise
Bogdanet, Delia
Egan, Aoife Maria
Biesty, Linda
Devane, Declan
O'Shea, Paula M
Dunne, Fidelma
author_sort Newman, Christine
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Diabetes mellitus is the most common metabolic complication of pregnancy and its prevalence worldwide is rising. The number of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) being conducted in people with diabetes is also increasing. Many studies preferentially publish findings on clinical endpoints and do not report patient-reported outcomes (PROs). In studies that do include PROs, PRO reporting is often of poor quality. METHODS: We will conduct this systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Using a combination of medical subject headings and keywords (combined using Boolean operators), we will search web-based databases (PubMed, Cochrane and EMBASE) for RCTs published in English between 2013 and 2021. Two reviewers will review titles and abstracts. We will review the full texts of any relevant abstracts and extract the following data: date of publication or recruitment period, journal of publication, country of study, multicentre or single centre, population and number of participants, type of intervention, frequency of PRO assessment and type of PRO (or PRO measurement) used. We will also record if the PRO was a primary, secondary or exploratory outcome. We will exclude reviews, observational studies, unpublished data for example, conference abstracts and trial protocols. Any published RCT that includes data on a PRO as a primary or secondary outcome will then be compared against the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials—Patient-Reported Outcome extension checklist, a structured and approved framework for the publication of results of PROs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval to conduct this study was obtained from the ethics committee at Galway University Hospitals on 24 March 2021 (CA 2592). We aim to publish our findings in a peer-reviewed journal and present our findings at national and international conferences. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: This systematic review was registered prospectively with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). Registration number CRD42021234917.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8565541
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85655412021-11-16 Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in randomised controlled trials in diabetes and pregnancy: protocol for a systematic review Newman, Christine Kgosidialwa, Oratile Dervan, Louise Bogdanet, Delia Egan, Aoife Maria Biesty, Linda Devane, Declan O'Shea, Paula M Dunne, Fidelma BMJ Open Diabetes and Endocrinology INTRODUCTION: Diabetes mellitus is the most common metabolic complication of pregnancy and its prevalence worldwide is rising. The number of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) being conducted in people with diabetes is also increasing. Many studies preferentially publish findings on clinical endpoints and do not report patient-reported outcomes (PROs). In studies that do include PROs, PRO reporting is often of poor quality. METHODS: We will conduct this systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Using a combination of medical subject headings and keywords (combined using Boolean operators), we will search web-based databases (PubMed, Cochrane and EMBASE) for RCTs published in English between 2013 and 2021. Two reviewers will review titles and abstracts. We will review the full texts of any relevant abstracts and extract the following data: date of publication or recruitment period, journal of publication, country of study, multicentre or single centre, population and number of participants, type of intervention, frequency of PRO assessment and type of PRO (or PRO measurement) used. We will also record if the PRO was a primary, secondary or exploratory outcome. We will exclude reviews, observational studies, unpublished data for example, conference abstracts and trial protocols. Any published RCT that includes data on a PRO as a primary or secondary outcome will then be compared against the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials—Patient-Reported Outcome extension checklist, a structured and approved framework for the publication of results of PROs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval to conduct this study was obtained from the ethics committee at Galway University Hospitals on 24 March 2021 (CA 2592). We aim to publish our findings in a peer-reviewed journal and present our findings at national and international conferences. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: This systematic review was registered prospectively with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). Registration number CRD42021234917. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8565541/ /pubmed/34728453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052506 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Diabetes and Endocrinology
Newman, Christine
Kgosidialwa, Oratile
Dervan, Louise
Bogdanet, Delia
Egan, Aoife Maria
Biesty, Linda
Devane, Declan
O'Shea, Paula M
Dunne, Fidelma
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in randomised controlled trials in diabetes and pregnancy: protocol for a systematic review
title Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in randomised controlled trials in diabetes and pregnancy: protocol for a systematic review
title_full Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in randomised controlled trials in diabetes and pregnancy: protocol for a systematic review
title_fullStr Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in randomised controlled trials in diabetes and pregnancy: protocol for a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in randomised controlled trials in diabetes and pregnancy: protocol for a systematic review
title_short Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in randomised controlled trials in diabetes and pregnancy: protocol for a systematic review
title_sort patient-reported outcomes (pros) in randomised controlled trials in diabetes and pregnancy: protocol for a systematic review
topic Diabetes and Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8565541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34728453
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052506
work_keys_str_mv AT newmanchristine patientreportedoutcomesprosinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsindiabetesandpregnancyprotocolforasystematicreview
AT kgosidialwaoratile patientreportedoutcomesprosinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsindiabetesandpregnancyprotocolforasystematicreview
AT dervanlouise patientreportedoutcomesprosinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsindiabetesandpregnancyprotocolforasystematicreview
AT bogdanetdelia patientreportedoutcomesprosinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsindiabetesandpregnancyprotocolforasystematicreview
AT eganaoifemaria patientreportedoutcomesprosinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsindiabetesandpregnancyprotocolforasystematicreview
AT biestylinda patientreportedoutcomesprosinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsindiabetesandpregnancyprotocolforasystematicreview
AT devanedeclan patientreportedoutcomesprosinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsindiabetesandpregnancyprotocolforasystematicreview
AT osheapaulam patientreportedoutcomesprosinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsindiabetesandpregnancyprotocolforasystematicreview
AT dunnefidelma patientreportedoutcomesprosinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsindiabetesandpregnancyprotocolforasystematicreview