Cargando…
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in randomised controlled trials in diabetes and pregnancy: protocol for a systematic review
INTRODUCTION: Diabetes mellitus is the most common metabolic complication of pregnancy and its prevalence worldwide is rising. The number of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) being conducted in people with diabetes is also increasing. Many studies preferentially publish findings on clinical endpoi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8565541/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34728453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052506 |
_version_ | 1784593839827189760 |
---|---|
author | Newman, Christine Kgosidialwa, Oratile Dervan, Louise Bogdanet, Delia Egan, Aoife Maria Biesty, Linda Devane, Declan O'Shea, Paula M Dunne, Fidelma |
author_facet | Newman, Christine Kgosidialwa, Oratile Dervan, Louise Bogdanet, Delia Egan, Aoife Maria Biesty, Linda Devane, Declan O'Shea, Paula M Dunne, Fidelma |
author_sort | Newman, Christine |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Diabetes mellitus is the most common metabolic complication of pregnancy and its prevalence worldwide is rising. The number of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) being conducted in people with diabetes is also increasing. Many studies preferentially publish findings on clinical endpoints and do not report patient-reported outcomes (PROs). In studies that do include PROs, PRO reporting is often of poor quality. METHODS: We will conduct this systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Using a combination of medical subject headings and keywords (combined using Boolean operators), we will search web-based databases (PubMed, Cochrane and EMBASE) for RCTs published in English between 2013 and 2021. Two reviewers will review titles and abstracts. We will review the full texts of any relevant abstracts and extract the following data: date of publication or recruitment period, journal of publication, country of study, multicentre or single centre, population and number of participants, type of intervention, frequency of PRO assessment and type of PRO (or PRO measurement) used. We will also record if the PRO was a primary, secondary or exploratory outcome. We will exclude reviews, observational studies, unpublished data for example, conference abstracts and trial protocols. Any published RCT that includes data on a PRO as a primary or secondary outcome will then be compared against the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials—Patient-Reported Outcome extension checklist, a structured and approved framework for the publication of results of PROs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval to conduct this study was obtained from the ethics committee at Galway University Hospitals on 24 March 2021 (CA 2592). We aim to publish our findings in a peer-reviewed journal and present our findings at national and international conferences. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: This systematic review was registered prospectively with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). Registration number CRD42021234917. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8565541 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85655412021-11-16 Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in randomised controlled trials in diabetes and pregnancy: protocol for a systematic review Newman, Christine Kgosidialwa, Oratile Dervan, Louise Bogdanet, Delia Egan, Aoife Maria Biesty, Linda Devane, Declan O'Shea, Paula M Dunne, Fidelma BMJ Open Diabetes and Endocrinology INTRODUCTION: Diabetes mellitus is the most common metabolic complication of pregnancy and its prevalence worldwide is rising. The number of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) being conducted in people with diabetes is also increasing. Many studies preferentially publish findings on clinical endpoints and do not report patient-reported outcomes (PROs). In studies that do include PROs, PRO reporting is often of poor quality. METHODS: We will conduct this systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Using a combination of medical subject headings and keywords (combined using Boolean operators), we will search web-based databases (PubMed, Cochrane and EMBASE) for RCTs published in English between 2013 and 2021. Two reviewers will review titles and abstracts. We will review the full texts of any relevant abstracts and extract the following data: date of publication or recruitment period, journal of publication, country of study, multicentre or single centre, population and number of participants, type of intervention, frequency of PRO assessment and type of PRO (or PRO measurement) used. We will also record if the PRO was a primary, secondary or exploratory outcome. We will exclude reviews, observational studies, unpublished data for example, conference abstracts and trial protocols. Any published RCT that includes data on a PRO as a primary or secondary outcome will then be compared against the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials—Patient-Reported Outcome extension checklist, a structured and approved framework for the publication of results of PROs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval to conduct this study was obtained from the ethics committee at Galway University Hospitals on 24 March 2021 (CA 2592). We aim to publish our findings in a peer-reviewed journal and present our findings at national and international conferences. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: This systematic review was registered prospectively with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). Registration number CRD42021234917. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8565541/ /pubmed/34728453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052506 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Diabetes and Endocrinology Newman, Christine Kgosidialwa, Oratile Dervan, Louise Bogdanet, Delia Egan, Aoife Maria Biesty, Linda Devane, Declan O'Shea, Paula M Dunne, Fidelma Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in randomised controlled trials in diabetes and pregnancy: protocol for a systematic review |
title | Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in randomised controlled trials in diabetes and pregnancy: protocol for a systematic review |
title_full | Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in randomised controlled trials in diabetes and pregnancy: protocol for a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in randomised controlled trials in diabetes and pregnancy: protocol for a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in randomised controlled trials in diabetes and pregnancy: protocol for a systematic review |
title_short | Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in randomised controlled trials in diabetes and pregnancy: protocol for a systematic review |
title_sort | patient-reported outcomes (pros) in randomised controlled trials in diabetes and pregnancy: protocol for a systematic review |
topic | Diabetes and Endocrinology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8565541/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34728453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052506 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT newmanchristine patientreportedoutcomesprosinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsindiabetesandpregnancyprotocolforasystematicreview AT kgosidialwaoratile patientreportedoutcomesprosinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsindiabetesandpregnancyprotocolforasystematicreview AT dervanlouise patientreportedoutcomesprosinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsindiabetesandpregnancyprotocolforasystematicreview AT bogdanetdelia patientreportedoutcomesprosinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsindiabetesandpregnancyprotocolforasystematicreview AT eganaoifemaria patientreportedoutcomesprosinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsindiabetesandpregnancyprotocolforasystematicreview AT biestylinda patientreportedoutcomesprosinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsindiabetesandpregnancyprotocolforasystematicreview AT devanedeclan patientreportedoutcomesprosinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsindiabetesandpregnancyprotocolforasystematicreview AT osheapaulam patientreportedoutcomesprosinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsindiabetesandpregnancyprotocolforasystematicreview AT dunnefidelma patientreportedoutcomesprosinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsindiabetesandpregnancyprotocolforasystematicreview |