Cargando…

Developing a prioritisation framework for patients in need of coronary artery angiography

BACKGROUND: Effective waiting list management and comprehensive prioritisation can provide timely delivery of appropriate services to ensure that the patient needs are met and increase equity in the provision of health services. We developed a prioritisation framework for patients in need of coronar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Doshmangir, Leila, Pourasghar, Faramarz, Sharghi, Rahim, Rezapour, Ramin, Gordeev, Vladimir Sergeevich
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8565640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34732170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12088-7
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Effective waiting list management and comprehensive prioritisation can provide timely delivery of appropriate services to ensure that the patient needs are met and increase equity in the provision of health services. We developed a prioritisation framework for patients in need of coronary artery angiography (CAA). METHODS: We used a multi-methods approach to elicit effective factors that affect CAA patient prioritisation. Qualitative data wase collected using semi-structured interviews with 15 experts. The final set of factors was selected using experts’ consensus through modifed Delphi technique. The framework was finalised during expert panel meetings. RESULTS: 212 effective factors were identified based on the literature review, interviews, and expert panel discussion of them, 37 factors were selected for modifed Delphi study. Following two rounds of Delphi discussions, seven final factors were selected and weighed by ten experts using pair-wise comparisons. The following weights were given: the severity of pain and symptoms (0.22), stress testing (0.18), background diseases (0.15), number of myocardial infarctions (0.15), waiting time (0.10), reduction of economic and social performance (0.12), and special conditions (0.08). CONCLUSION: Clinical effective factors were important for CAA prioritisation framework. Using this framework can potentially lead to improved accountability and justice in the health system. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-12088-7.