Cargando…
Developing a prioritisation framework for patients in need of coronary artery angiography
BACKGROUND: Effective waiting list management and comprehensive prioritisation can provide timely delivery of appropriate services to ensure that the patient needs are met and increase equity in the provision of health services. We developed a prioritisation framework for patients in need of coronar...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8565640/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34732170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12088-7 |
_version_ | 1784593856646348800 |
---|---|
author | Doshmangir, Leila Pourasghar, Faramarz Sharghi, Rahim Rezapour, Ramin Gordeev, Vladimir Sergeevich |
author_facet | Doshmangir, Leila Pourasghar, Faramarz Sharghi, Rahim Rezapour, Ramin Gordeev, Vladimir Sergeevich |
author_sort | Doshmangir, Leila |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Effective waiting list management and comprehensive prioritisation can provide timely delivery of appropriate services to ensure that the patient needs are met and increase equity in the provision of health services. We developed a prioritisation framework for patients in need of coronary artery angiography (CAA). METHODS: We used a multi-methods approach to elicit effective factors that affect CAA patient prioritisation. Qualitative data wase collected using semi-structured interviews with 15 experts. The final set of factors was selected using experts’ consensus through modifed Delphi technique. The framework was finalised during expert panel meetings. RESULTS: 212 effective factors were identified based on the literature review, interviews, and expert panel discussion of them, 37 factors were selected for modifed Delphi study. Following two rounds of Delphi discussions, seven final factors were selected and weighed by ten experts using pair-wise comparisons. The following weights were given: the severity of pain and symptoms (0.22), stress testing (0.18), background diseases (0.15), number of myocardial infarctions (0.15), waiting time (0.10), reduction of economic and social performance (0.12), and special conditions (0.08). CONCLUSION: Clinical effective factors were important for CAA prioritisation framework. Using this framework can potentially lead to improved accountability and justice in the health system. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-12088-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8565640 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85656402021-11-04 Developing a prioritisation framework for patients in need of coronary artery angiography Doshmangir, Leila Pourasghar, Faramarz Sharghi, Rahim Rezapour, Ramin Gordeev, Vladimir Sergeevich BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Effective waiting list management and comprehensive prioritisation can provide timely delivery of appropriate services to ensure that the patient needs are met and increase equity in the provision of health services. We developed a prioritisation framework for patients in need of coronary artery angiography (CAA). METHODS: We used a multi-methods approach to elicit effective factors that affect CAA patient prioritisation. Qualitative data wase collected using semi-structured interviews with 15 experts. The final set of factors was selected using experts’ consensus through modifed Delphi technique. The framework was finalised during expert panel meetings. RESULTS: 212 effective factors were identified based on the literature review, interviews, and expert panel discussion of them, 37 factors were selected for modifed Delphi study. Following two rounds of Delphi discussions, seven final factors were selected and weighed by ten experts using pair-wise comparisons. The following weights were given: the severity of pain and symptoms (0.22), stress testing (0.18), background diseases (0.15), number of myocardial infarctions (0.15), waiting time (0.10), reduction of economic and social performance (0.12), and special conditions (0.08). CONCLUSION: Clinical effective factors were important for CAA prioritisation framework. Using this framework can potentially lead to improved accountability and justice in the health system. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-12088-7. BioMed Central 2021-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8565640/ /pubmed/34732170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12088-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Doshmangir, Leila Pourasghar, Faramarz Sharghi, Rahim Rezapour, Ramin Gordeev, Vladimir Sergeevich Developing a prioritisation framework for patients in need of coronary artery angiography |
title | Developing a prioritisation framework for patients in need of coronary artery angiography |
title_full | Developing a prioritisation framework for patients in need of coronary artery angiography |
title_fullStr | Developing a prioritisation framework for patients in need of coronary artery angiography |
title_full_unstemmed | Developing a prioritisation framework for patients in need of coronary artery angiography |
title_short | Developing a prioritisation framework for patients in need of coronary artery angiography |
title_sort | developing a prioritisation framework for patients in need of coronary artery angiography |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8565640/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34732170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12088-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT doshmangirleila developingaprioritisationframeworkforpatientsinneedofcoronaryarteryangiography AT pourasgharfaramarz developingaprioritisationframeworkforpatientsinneedofcoronaryarteryangiography AT sharghirahim developingaprioritisationframeworkforpatientsinneedofcoronaryarteryangiography AT rezapourramin developingaprioritisationframeworkforpatientsinneedofcoronaryarteryangiography AT gordeevvladimirsergeevich developingaprioritisationframeworkforpatientsinneedofcoronaryarteryangiography |