Cargando…

Patients’ perspectives of prehabilitation as an extension of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols

BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) and prehabilitation programs are evidence-based and patient-focused, yet meaningful patient input could further enhance these interventions to produce superior patient outcomes and patient experiences. We conducted a qualitative study with patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gillis, Chelsia, Gill, Marlyn, Gramlich, Leah, Culos-Reed, S. Nicole, Nelson, Greg, Ljungqvist, Olle, Carli, Franco, Fenton, Tanis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: CMA Joule Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8565881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34728523
http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cjs.014420
_version_ 1784593900090949632
author Gillis, Chelsia
Gill, Marlyn
Gramlich, Leah
Culos-Reed, S. Nicole
Nelson, Greg
Ljungqvist, Olle
Carli, Franco
Fenton, Tanis
author_facet Gillis, Chelsia
Gill, Marlyn
Gramlich, Leah
Culos-Reed, S. Nicole
Nelson, Greg
Ljungqvist, Olle
Carli, Franco
Fenton, Tanis
author_sort Gillis, Chelsia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) and prehabilitation programs are evidence-based and patient-focused, yet meaningful patient input could further enhance these interventions to produce superior patient outcomes and patient experiences. We conducted a qualitative study with patients who had undergone colorectal surgery under ERAS care to determine how they prepared for surgery, their views on prehabilitation and how prehabilitation could be delivered to best meet patient needs. METHODS: We conducted semistructured interviews with adult patients who had undergone colorectal surgery under ERAS care within 3 months after surgery. Patients were enrolled between April 2018 and June 2019 through purposive sampling from 1 hospital in Alberta. The interview transcripts were analyzed independently by a researcher and a trained patient-researcher using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Twenty patients were interviewed. Three main themes were identified. First, waiting for surgery: patients described fear, anxiety, isolation and deterioration of their mental and physical states as they waited passively for surgery. Second, preparing would have been better than just waiting: patients perceived that a prehabilitation program could prepare them for their operation if it addressed their emotional and physical needs, provided personalized support, offered home strategies, involved family and included surgical expectations (both what to expect and what is expected of them). Third, partnering with patients: preoperative preparation should occur on a continuum that meets patients where they are at and in a partnership that respects patients’ expertise and desired level of engagement. CONCLUSION: We identified several patient priorities for the preoperative period. Integrating these priorities within ERAS and prehabilitative programs could improve patient satisfaction, experiences and outcomes. Actively engaging patients in their care might alleviate some of the anxiety and fear associated with waiting passively for surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8565881
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher CMA Joule Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85658812021-11-05 Patients’ perspectives of prehabilitation as an extension of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols Gillis, Chelsia Gill, Marlyn Gramlich, Leah Culos-Reed, S. Nicole Nelson, Greg Ljungqvist, Olle Carli, Franco Fenton, Tanis Can J Surg Research BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) and prehabilitation programs are evidence-based and patient-focused, yet meaningful patient input could further enhance these interventions to produce superior patient outcomes and patient experiences. We conducted a qualitative study with patients who had undergone colorectal surgery under ERAS care to determine how they prepared for surgery, their views on prehabilitation and how prehabilitation could be delivered to best meet patient needs. METHODS: We conducted semistructured interviews with adult patients who had undergone colorectal surgery under ERAS care within 3 months after surgery. Patients were enrolled between April 2018 and June 2019 through purposive sampling from 1 hospital in Alberta. The interview transcripts were analyzed independently by a researcher and a trained patient-researcher using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Twenty patients were interviewed. Three main themes were identified. First, waiting for surgery: patients described fear, anxiety, isolation and deterioration of their mental and physical states as they waited passively for surgery. Second, preparing would have been better than just waiting: patients perceived that a prehabilitation program could prepare them for their operation if it addressed their emotional and physical needs, provided personalized support, offered home strategies, involved family and included surgical expectations (both what to expect and what is expected of them). Third, partnering with patients: preoperative preparation should occur on a continuum that meets patients where they are at and in a partnership that respects patients’ expertise and desired level of engagement. CONCLUSION: We identified several patient priorities for the preoperative period. Integrating these priorities within ERAS and prehabilitative programs could improve patient satisfaction, experiences and outcomes. Actively engaging patients in their care might alleviate some of the anxiety and fear associated with waiting passively for surgery. CMA Joule Inc. 2021-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8565881/ /pubmed/34728523 http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cjs.014420 Text en © 2021 CMA Joule Inc. or its licensors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original publication is properly cited, the use is noncommercial (i.e., research or educational use), and no modifications or adaptations are made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Research
Gillis, Chelsia
Gill, Marlyn
Gramlich, Leah
Culos-Reed, S. Nicole
Nelson, Greg
Ljungqvist, Olle
Carli, Franco
Fenton, Tanis
Patients’ perspectives of prehabilitation as an extension of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols
title Patients’ perspectives of prehabilitation as an extension of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols
title_full Patients’ perspectives of prehabilitation as an extension of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols
title_fullStr Patients’ perspectives of prehabilitation as an extension of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols
title_full_unstemmed Patients’ perspectives of prehabilitation as an extension of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols
title_short Patients’ perspectives of prehabilitation as an extension of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols
title_sort patients’ perspectives of prehabilitation as an extension of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8565881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34728523
http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cjs.014420
work_keys_str_mv AT gillischelsia patientsperspectivesofprehabilitationasanextensionofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocols
AT gillmarlyn patientsperspectivesofprehabilitationasanextensionofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocols
AT gramlichleah patientsperspectivesofprehabilitationasanextensionofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocols
AT culosreedsnicole patientsperspectivesofprehabilitationasanextensionofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocols
AT nelsongreg patientsperspectivesofprehabilitationasanextensionofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocols
AT ljungqvistolle patientsperspectivesofprehabilitationasanextensionofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocols
AT carlifranco patientsperspectivesofprehabilitationasanextensionofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocols
AT fentontanis patientsperspectivesofprehabilitationasanextensionofenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocols