Cargando…

Predictors of Visual Acuity Outcomes after Anti–Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment for Macular Edema Secondary to Central Retinal Vein Occlusion

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether baseline demographic, clinical, and OCT characteristics predict visual acuity (VA) outcomes in patients receiving anti–vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy for macular edema (ME) due to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sen, Piyali, Gurudas, Sarega, Ramu, Jayashree, Patrao, Namritha, Chandra, Shruti, Rasheed, Rajna, Nicholson, Luke, Peto, Tunde, Sivaprasad, Sobha, Hykin, Philip
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Academy of Ophthalmology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8565966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33610836
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2021.02.008
_version_ 1784593912184176640
author Sen, Piyali
Gurudas, Sarega
Ramu, Jayashree
Patrao, Namritha
Chandra, Shruti
Rasheed, Rajna
Nicholson, Luke
Peto, Tunde
Sivaprasad, Sobha
Hykin, Philip
author_facet Sen, Piyali
Gurudas, Sarega
Ramu, Jayashree
Patrao, Namritha
Chandra, Shruti
Rasheed, Rajna
Nicholson, Luke
Peto, Tunde
Sivaprasad, Sobha
Hykin, Philip
author_sort Sen, Piyali
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate whether baseline demographic, clinical, and OCT characteristics predict visual acuity (VA) outcomes in patients receiving anti–vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy for macular edema (ME) due to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of the randomized noninferiority trial (Lucentis, Eylea, Avastin in CRVO) LEAVO Study from December 12, 2014, to December 16, 2016, carried out across 44 UK National Health Service ophthalmology departments. PARTICIPANTS: Data on 267 participants with a baseline best-corrected mean visual acuity (BCVA) range of 19 to 78 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letter score (approximate Snellen equivalent, 20/32 to 20/320) who had central subfield thickness (CST) ≥ 320 μm on Spectralis OCT (Heidelberg Engineering) were analyzed. METHODS: Study participants were randomized to receive repeated intravitreal injections of ranibizumab (0.5 mg/50 μl), aflibercept (2.0 mg/50 μl), or bevacizumab (1.25 mg/50 μl), and a protocol-driven pro re nata re-treatment regimen at 4 to 8 weekly visits was followed up to week 100 after 4 mandated 4-weekly loading injections. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in BCVA and percentage of patients gaining ≥ 10 letters and achieving BCVA letter score > 70 letters at 52 and 100 weeks. RESULTS: The analysis was adjusted for treatment effects and confirmed by sensitivity analysis. Age ≥ 75 years is a poor predictor for all 3 visual outcomes. Lower baseline BCVA predicted 10-letter gainers and higher gains in BCVA, although it is a poor predictor of achieving > 70 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters. None of the baseline OCT morphologic characteristics except ellipsoid zone (EZ) integrity influenced any visual outcomes. Both baseline CST and total macular volume showed a nonlinear relation to 10-letter gainers, with CST > 900 μm being a poor prognostic indicator. Baseline CST and macular volume did not predict mean change in BCVA or BCVA > 70 letters at 52 and 100 weeks. The sensitivity analysis conclusions after removing iCRVO were similar. CONCLUSIONS: At presentation, younger age, higher baseline BCVA, and a definitely intact subfoveal EZ are predictors of BCVA score > 70 letters at 100 weeks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8565966
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Academy of Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85659662021-11-09 Predictors of Visual Acuity Outcomes after Anti–Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment for Macular Edema Secondary to Central Retinal Vein Occlusion Sen, Piyali Gurudas, Sarega Ramu, Jayashree Patrao, Namritha Chandra, Shruti Rasheed, Rajna Nicholson, Luke Peto, Tunde Sivaprasad, Sobha Hykin, Philip Ophthalmol Retina Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate whether baseline demographic, clinical, and OCT characteristics predict visual acuity (VA) outcomes in patients receiving anti–vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy for macular edema (ME) due to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of the randomized noninferiority trial (Lucentis, Eylea, Avastin in CRVO) LEAVO Study from December 12, 2014, to December 16, 2016, carried out across 44 UK National Health Service ophthalmology departments. PARTICIPANTS: Data on 267 participants with a baseline best-corrected mean visual acuity (BCVA) range of 19 to 78 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letter score (approximate Snellen equivalent, 20/32 to 20/320) who had central subfield thickness (CST) ≥ 320 μm on Spectralis OCT (Heidelberg Engineering) were analyzed. METHODS: Study participants were randomized to receive repeated intravitreal injections of ranibizumab (0.5 mg/50 μl), aflibercept (2.0 mg/50 μl), or bevacizumab (1.25 mg/50 μl), and a protocol-driven pro re nata re-treatment regimen at 4 to 8 weekly visits was followed up to week 100 after 4 mandated 4-weekly loading injections. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in BCVA and percentage of patients gaining ≥ 10 letters and achieving BCVA letter score > 70 letters at 52 and 100 weeks. RESULTS: The analysis was adjusted for treatment effects and confirmed by sensitivity analysis. Age ≥ 75 years is a poor predictor for all 3 visual outcomes. Lower baseline BCVA predicted 10-letter gainers and higher gains in BCVA, although it is a poor predictor of achieving > 70 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters. None of the baseline OCT morphologic characteristics except ellipsoid zone (EZ) integrity influenced any visual outcomes. Both baseline CST and total macular volume showed a nonlinear relation to 10-letter gainers, with CST > 900 μm being a poor prognostic indicator. Baseline CST and macular volume did not predict mean change in BCVA or BCVA > 70 letters at 52 and 100 weeks. The sensitivity analysis conclusions after removing iCRVO were similar. CONCLUSIONS: At presentation, younger age, higher baseline BCVA, and a definitely intact subfoveal EZ are predictors of BCVA score > 70 letters at 100 weeks. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Academy of Ophthalmology 2021-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8565966/ /pubmed/33610836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2021.02.008 Text en © 2021 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Sen, Piyali
Gurudas, Sarega
Ramu, Jayashree
Patrao, Namritha
Chandra, Shruti
Rasheed, Rajna
Nicholson, Luke
Peto, Tunde
Sivaprasad, Sobha
Hykin, Philip
Predictors of Visual Acuity Outcomes after Anti–Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment for Macular Edema Secondary to Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
title Predictors of Visual Acuity Outcomes after Anti–Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment for Macular Edema Secondary to Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
title_full Predictors of Visual Acuity Outcomes after Anti–Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment for Macular Edema Secondary to Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
title_fullStr Predictors of Visual Acuity Outcomes after Anti–Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment for Macular Edema Secondary to Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
title_full_unstemmed Predictors of Visual Acuity Outcomes after Anti–Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment for Macular Edema Secondary to Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
title_short Predictors of Visual Acuity Outcomes after Anti–Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment for Macular Edema Secondary to Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
title_sort predictors of visual acuity outcomes after anti–vascular endothelial growth factor treatment for macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8565966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33610836
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2021.02.008
work_keys_str_mv AT senpiyali predictorsofvisualacuityoutcomesafterantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortreatmentformacularedemasecondarytocentralretinalveinocclusion
AT gurudassarega predictorsofvisualacuityoutcomesafterantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortreatmentformacularedemasecondarytocentralretinalveinocclusion
AT ramujayashree predictorsofvisualacuityoutcomesafterantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortreatmentformacularedemasecondarytocentralretinalveinocclusion
AT patraonamritha predictorsofvisualacuityoutcomesafterantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortreatmentformacularedemasecondarytocentralretinalveinocclusion
AT chandrashruti predictorsofvisualacuityoutcomesafterantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortreatmentformacularedemasecondarytocentralretinalveinocclusion
AT rasheedrajna predictorsofvisualacuityoutcomesafterantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortreatmentformacularedemasecondarytocentralretinalveinocclusion
AT nicholsonluke predictorsofvisualacuityoutcomesafterantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortreatmentformacularedemasecondarytocentralretinalveinocclusion
AT petotunde predictorsofvisualacuityoutcomesafterantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortreatmentformacularedemasecondarytocentralretinalveinocclusion
AT sivaprasadsobha predictorsofvisualacuityoutcomesafterantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortreatmentformacularedemasecondarytocentralretinalveinocclusion
AT hykinphilip predictorsofvisualacuityoutcomesafterantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortreatmentformacularedemasecondarytocentralretinalveinocclusion