Cargando…

Advancing the Regulation of Traditional and Complementary Medicine Products: A Comparison of Five Regulatory Systems on Traditional Medicines with a Long History of Use

BACKGROUND: An appropriate regulatory system to ensure and promote the quality, safety, and efficacy of the products of traditional medicine (TM) and complementary medicine (CM) is critical to not only public health but also economic growth. The regulatory approach and evaluation standards for TM/CM...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liang, Zuanji, Hu, Hao, Li, Junlei, Yao, Dongning, Wang, Yitao, Ung, Carolina Oi Lam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8566035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34745290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5833945
_version_ 1784593927474511872
author Liang, Zuanji
Hu, Hao
Li, Junlei
Yao, Dongning
Wang, Yitao
Ung, Carolina Oi Lam
author_facet Liang, Zuanji
Hu, Hao
Li, Junlei
Yao, Dongning
Wang, Yitao
Ung, Carolina Oi Lam
author_sort Liang, Zuanji
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An appropriate regulatory system to ensure and promote the quality, safety, and efficacy of the products of traditional medicine (TM) and complementary medicine (CM) is critical to not only public health but also economic growth. The regulatory approach and evaluation standards for TM/CM products featured with a long history of use are yet to be developed. This study aims to investigate and compare the existing regulatory approaches for TM/CM products with a long history of use. METHOD: A mixed approach of documentary analysis involving official and legal documents from official websites, as well as a scoping review of scholarly work in scientific databases about regulatory systems of TM/CM products in China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Japan, and Korea, was employed in this study and used for comparison. RESULTS: For registration purposes, all five regulatory systems recognized the history of use as part of the totality of evidence when evaluating the safety and efficacy of TM/CM products with a long history of use. Generally, the list of classic formulas is predefined and bound to the formulas recommended in the prescribed list of ancient medical textbooks. Expedited pathways are usually in place and scientific data of nonclinical and clinical studies may be exempted. At the same time, additional restrictions with the scope of products constitute a comprehensive approach in the regulation. Quality assurance and postmarketing safety surveillance were found to be the major focus across the regulatory schemes investigated in this study. CONCLUSION: The regulatory systems investigated in this study allow less stringent registration requirements for TM/CM products featured with a long history of use, assuming safety and efficacy to be plausible based on historic use. Considering the safety and efficacy of these products, regulatory standards should emphasize the technical requirements for quality control and postmarket surveillance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8566035
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85660352021-11-04 Advancing the Regulation of Traditional and Complementary Medicine Products: A Comparison of Five Regulatory Systems on Traditional Medicines with a Long History of Use Liang, Zuanji Hu, Hao Li, Junlei Yao, Dongning Wang, Yitao Ung, Carolina Oi Lam Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Review Article BACKGROUND: An appropriate regulatory system to ensure and promote the quality, safety, and efficacy of the products of traditional medicine (TM) and complementary medicine (CM) is critical to not only public health but also economic growth. The regulatory approach and evaluation standards for TM/CM products featured with a long history of use are yet to be developed. This study aims to investigate and compare the existing regulatory approaches for TM/CM products with a long history of use. METHOD: A mixed approach of documentary analysis involving official and legal documents from official websites, as well as a scoping review of scholarly work in scientific databases about regulatory systems of TM/CM products in China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Japan, and Korea, was employed in this study and used for comparison. RESULTS: For registration purposes, all five regulatory systems recognized the history of use as part of the totality of evidence when evaluating the safety and efficacy of TM/CM products with a long history of use. Generally, the list of classic formulas is predefined and bound to the formulas recommended in the prescribed list of ancient medical textbooks. Expedited pathways are usually in place and scientific data of nonclinical and clinical studies may be exempted. At the same time, additional restrictions with the scope of products constitute a comprehensive approach in the regulation. Quality assurance and postmarketing safety surveillance were found to be the major focus across the regulatory schemes investigated in this study. CONCLUSION: The regulatory systems investigated in this study allow less stringent registration requirements for TM/CM products featured with a long history of use, assuming safety and efficacy to be plausible based on historic use. Considering the safety and efficacy of these products, regulatory standards should emphasize the technical requirements for quality control and postmarket surveillance. Hindawi 2021-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8566035/ /pubmed/34745290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5833945 Text en Copyright © 2021 Zuanji Liang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Liang, Zuanji
Hu, Hao
Li, Junlei
Yao, Dongning
Wang, Yitao
Ung, Carolina Oi Lam
Advancing the Regulation of Traditional and Complementary Medicine Products: A Comparison of Five Regulatory Systems on Traditional Medicines with a Long History of Use
title Advancing the Regulation of Traditional and Complementary Medicine Products: A Comparison of Five Regulatory Systems on Traditional Medicines with a Long History of Use
title_full Advancing the Regulation of Traditional and Complementary Medicine Products: A Comparison of Five Regulatory Systems on Traditional Medicines with a Long History of Use
title_fullStr Advancing the Regulation of Traditional and Complementary Medicine Products: A Comparison of Five Regulatory Systems on Traditional Medicines with a Long History of Use
title_full_unstemmed Advancing the Regulation of Traditional and Complementary Medicine Products: A Comparison of Five Regulatory Systems on Traditional Medicines with a Long History of Use
title_short Advancing the Regulation of Traditional and Complementary Medicine Products: A Comparison of Five Regulatory Systems on Traditional Medicines with a Long History of Use
title_sort advancing the regulation of traditional and complementary medicine products: a comparison of five regulatory systems on traditional medicines with a long history of use
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8566035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34745290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5833945
work_keys_str_mv AT liangzuanji advancingtheregulationoftraditionalandcomplementarymedicineproductsacomparisonoffiveregulatorysystemsontraditionalmedicineswithalonghistoryofuse
AT huhao advancingtheregulationoftraditionalandcomplementarymedicineproductsacomparisonoffiveregulatorysystemsontraditionalmedicineswithalonghistoryofuse
AT lijunlei advancingtheregulationoftraditionalandcomplementarymedicineproductsacomparisonoffiveregulatorysystemsontraditionalmedicineswithalonghistoryofuse
AT yaodongning advancingtheregulationoftraditionalandcomplementarymedicineproductsacomparisonoffiveregulatorysystemsontraditionalmedicineswithalonghistoryofuse
AT wangyitao advancingtheregulationoftraditionalandcomplementarymedicineproductsacomparisonoffiveregulatorysystemsontraditionalmedicineswithalonghistoryofuse
AT ungcarolinaoilam advancingtheregulationoftraditionalandcomplementarymedicineproductsacomparisonoffiveregulatorysystemsontraditionalmedicineswithalonghistoryofuse