Cargando…

Mining user reviews of COVID contact-tracing apps: An exploratory analysis of nine European apps()

CONTEXT: More than 78 countries have developed COVID contact-tracing apps to limit the spread of coronavirus. However, many experts and scientists cast doubt on the effectiveness of those apps. For each app, a large number of reviews have been entered by end-users in app stores. OBJECTIVE: Our goal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garousi, Vahid, Cutting, David, Felderer, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8566091/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34751198
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2021.111136
_version_ 1784593941218197504
author Garousi, Vahid
Cutting, David
Felderer, Michael
author_facet Garousi, Vahid
Cutting, David
Felderer, Michael
author_sort Garousi, Vahid
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: More than 78 countries have developed COVID contact-tracing apps to limit the spread of coronavirus. However, many experts and scientists cast doubt on the effectiveness of those apps. For each app, a large number of reviews have been entered by end-users in app stores. OBJECTIVE: Our goal is to gain insights into the user reviews of those apps, and to find out the main problems that users have reported. Our focus is to assess the “software in society” aspects of the apps, based on user reviews. METHOD: We selected nine European national apps for our analysis and used a commercial app-review analytics tool to extract and mine the user reviews. For all the apps combined, our dataset includes 39,425 user reviews. RESULTS: Results show that users are generally dissatisfied with the nine apps under study, except the Scottish (“Protect Scotland”) app. Some of the major issues that users have complained about are high battery drainage and doubts on whether apps are really working. CONCLUSION: Our results show that more work is needed by the stakeholders behind the apps (e.g., app developers, decision-makers, public health experts) to improve the public adoption, software quality and public perception of these apps.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8566091
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85660912021-11-04 Mining user reviews of COVID contact-tracing apps: An exploratory analysis of nine European apps() Garousi, Vahid Cutting, David Felderer, Michael J Syst Softw In Practice CONTEXT: More than 78 countries have developed COVID contact-tracing apps to limit the spread of coronavirus. However, many experts and scientists cast doubt on the effectiveness of those apps. For each app, a large number of reviews have been entered by end-users in app stores. OBJECTIVE: Our goal is to gain insights into the user reviews of those apps, and to find out the main problems that users have reported. Our focus is to assess the “software in society” aspects of the apps, based on user reviews. METHOD: We selected nine European national apps for our analysis and used a commercial app-review analytics tool to extract and mine the user reviews. For all the apps combined, our dataset includes 39,425 user reviews. RESULTS: Results show that users are generally dissatisfied with the nine apps under study, except the Scottish (“Protect Scotland”) app. Some of the major issues that users have complained about are high battery drainage and doubts on whether apps are really working. CONCLUSION: Our results show that more work is needed by the stakeholders behind the apps (e.g., app developers, decision-makers, public health experts) to improve the public adoption, software quality and public perception of these apps. Elsevier Inc. 2022-02 2021-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8566091/ /pubmed/34751198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2021.111136 Text en © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle In Practice
Garousi, Vahid
Cutting, David
Felderer, Michael
Mining user reviews of COVID contact-tracing apps: An exploratory analysis of nine European apps()
title Mining user reviews of COVID contact-tracing apps: An exploratory analysis of nine European apps()
title_full Mining user reviews of COVID contact-tracing apps: An exploratory analysis of nine European apps()
title_fullStr Mining user reviews of COVID contact-tracing apps: An exploratory analysis of nine European apps()
title_full_unstemmed Mining user reviews of COVID contact-tracing apps: An exploratory analysis of nine European apps()
title_short Mining user reviews of COVID contact-tracing apps: An exploratory analysis of nine European apps()
title_sort mining user reviews of covid contact-tracing apps: an exploratory analysis of nine european apps()
topic In Practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8566091/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34751198
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2021.111136
work_keys_str_mv AT garousivahid mininguserreviewsofcovidcontacttracingappsanexploratoryanalysisofnineeuropeanapps
AT cuttingdavid mininguserreviewsofcovidcontacttracingappsanexploratoryanalysisofnineeuropeanapps
AT felderermichael mininguserreviewsofcovidcontacttracingappsanexploratoryanalysisofnineeuropeanapps