Cargando…

Minimal Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy (LIS): Is It Enough to Cut Less Than the Conventional Tailored LIS?

PURPOSE: Anal fissure is a common anorectal condition, yet its pathogenesis remains unclear. Lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) is the gold standard treatment for chronic anal fissures that do not respond to conservative treatment; however, it has a risk of anal incontinence. We believe that fibr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Keun-Hee, Hyun, Keehoon, Yoon, Seo-Gue, Lee, Jong-Kyun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Coloproctology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8566144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34246204
http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.00976.0139
_version_ 1784593953644871680
author Lee, Keun-Hee
Hyun, Keehoon
Yoon, Seo-Gue
Lee, Jong-Kyun
author_facet Lee, Keun-Hee
Hyun, Keehoon
Yoon, Seo-Gue
Lee, Jong-Kyun
author_sort Lee, Keun-Hee
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Anal fissure is a common anorectal condition, yet its pathogenesis remains unclear. Lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) is the gold standard treatment for chronic anal fissures that do not respond to conservative treatment; however, it has a risk of anal incontinence. We believe that fibrosis of the internal anal sphincter is an important factor in the pathogenesis of chronic anal fissure. In this study, we describe the minimal LIS method, a minimally invasive method where only the fibrotic portion of the internal anal sphincter is cut. We also describe the outcomes of this method. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 468 patients (270 male and 198 female) who underwent minimal LIS for chronic anal fissure in 2017 at Seoul Song Do Hospital. We analyzed the patients’ clinical characteristics, manometry data, complications, and outcomes of minimal LIS. The outcomes of the surgery were assessed via questionnaires during the postoperative outpatient visits, beginning 2 weeks postoperatively. RESULTS: The overall complication rate was 4.0% (19 patients). Delayed healing occurred in 14 patients (3.0%), perianal abscess was present in 3 patients (0.6%), and gas incontinence occurred in 2 patients (0.4%). All complications were improved with conservative treatment. Recurrence, defined as the recurrence of anal fissure more than 4 weeks after healing, was present in 6 patients (1.3%). CONCLUSION: Minimal LIS is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with chronic anal fissure. Postoperative complications, especially incontinence and recurrence, are rare.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8566144
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Korean Society of Coloproctology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85661442021-11-18 Minimal Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy (LIS): Is It Enough to Cut Less Than the Conventional Tailored LIS? Lee, Keun-Hee Hyun, Keehoon Yoon, Seo-Gue Lee, Jong-Kyun Ann Coloproctol Original Article PURPOSE: Anal fissure is a common anorectal condition, yet its pathogenesis remains unclear. Lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) is the gold standard treatment for chronic anal fissures that do not respond to conservative treatment; however, it has a risk of anal incontinence. We believe that fibrosis of the internal anal sphincter is an important factor in the pathogenesis of chronic anal fissure. In this study, we describe the minimal LIS method, a minimally invasive method where only the fibrotic portion of the internal anal sphincter is cut. We also describe the outcomes of this method. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 468 patients (270 male and 198 female) who underwent minimal LIS for chronic anal fissure in 2017 at Seoul Song Do Hospital. We analyzed the patients’ clinical characteristics, manometry data, complications, and outcomes of minimal LIS. The outcomes of the surgery were assessed via questionnaires during the postoperative outpatient visits, beginning 2 weeks postoperatively. RESULTS: The overall complication rate was 4.0% (19 patients). Delayed healing occurred in 14 patients (3.0%), perianal abscess was present in 3 patients (0.6%), and gas incontinence occurred in 2 patients (0.4%). All complications were improved with conservative treatment. Recurrence, defined as the recurrence of anal fissure more than 4 weeks after healing, was present in 6 patients (1.3%). CONCLUSION: Minimal LIS is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with chronic anal fissure. Postoperative complications, especially incontinence and recurrence, are rare. Korean Society of Coloproctology 2021-10 2021-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8566144/ /pubmed/34246204 http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.00976.0139 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Korean Society of Coloproctology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Keun-Hee
Hyun, Keehoon
Yoon, Seo-Gue
Lee, Jong-Kyun
Minimal Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy (LIS): Is It Enough to Cut Less Than the Conventional Tailored LIS?
title Minimal Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy (LIS): Is It Enough to Cut Less Than the Conventional Tailored LIS?
title_full Minimal Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy (LIS): Is It Enough to Cut Less Than the Conventional Tailored LIS?
title_fullStr Minimal Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy (LIS): Is It Enough to Cut Less Than the Conventional Tailored LIS?
title_full_unstemmed Minimal Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy (LIS): Is It Enough to Cut Less Than the Conventional Tailored LIS?
title_short Minimal Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy (LIS): Is It Enough to Cut Less Than the Conventional Tailored LIS?
title_sort minimal lateral internal sphincterotomy (lis): is it enough to cut less than the conventional tailored lis?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8566144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34246204
http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.00976.0139
work_keys_str_mv AT leekeunhee minimallateralinternalsphincterotomylisisitenoughtocutlessthantheconventionaltailoredlis
AT hyunkeehoon minimallateralinternalsphincterotomylisisitenoughtocutlessthantheconventionaltailoredlis
AT yoonseogue minimallateralinternalsphincterotomylisisitenoughtocutlessthantheconventionaltailoredlis
AT leejongkyun minimallateralinternalsphincterotomylisisitenoughtocutlessthantheconventionaltailoredlis