Cargando…

The Anabolic Response to Plant-Based Protein Ingestion

There is a global trend of an increased interest in plant-based diets. This includes an increase in the consumption of plant-based proteins at the expense of animal-based proteins. Plant-derived proteins are now also frequently applied in sports nutrition. So far, we have learned that the ingestion...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pinckaers, Philippe J. M., Trommelen, Jorn, Snijders, Tim, van Loon, Luc J. C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8566416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34515966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-021-01540-8
_version_ 1784594005851373568
author Pinckaers, Philippe J. M.
Trommelen, Jorn
Snijders, Tim
van Loon, Luc J. C.
author_facet Pinckaers, Philippe J. M.
Trommelen, Jorn
Snijders, Tim
van Loon, Luc J. C.
author_sort Pinckaers, Philippe J. M.
collection PubMed
description There is a global trend of an increased interest in plant-based diets. This includes an increase in the consumption of plant-based proteins at the expense of animal-based proteins. Plant-derived proteins are now also frequently applied in sports nutrition. So far, we have learned that the ingestion of plant-derived proteins, such as soy and wheat protein, result in lower post-prandial muscle protein synthesis responses when compared with the ingestion of an equivalent amount of animal-based protein. The lesser anabolic properties of plant-based versus animal-derived proteins may be attributed to differences in their protein digestion and amino acid absorption kinetics, as well as to differences in amino acid composition between these protein sources. Most plant-based proteins have a low essential amino acid content and are often deficient in one or more specific amino acids, such as lysine and methionine. However, there are large differences in amino acid composition between various plant-derived proteins or plant-based protein sources. So far, only a few studies have directly compared the muscle protein synthetic response following the ingestion of a plant-derived protein versus a high(er) quality animal-derived protein. The proposed lower anabolic properties of plant- versus animal-derived proteins may be compensated for by (i) consuming a greater amount of the plant-derived protein or plant-based protein source to compensate for the lesser quality; (ii) using specific blends of plant-based proteins to create a more balanced amino acid profile; (iii) fortifying the plant-based protein (source) with the specific free amino acid(s) that is (are) deficient. Clinical studies are warranted to assess the anabolic properties of the various plant-derived proteins and their protein sources in vivo in humans and to identify the factors that may or may not compromise the capacity to stimulate post-prandial muscle protein synthesis rates. Such work is needed to determine whether the transition towards a more plant-based diet is accompanied by a transition towards greater dietary protein intake requirements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8566416
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85664162021-11-15 The Anabolic Response to Plant-Based Protein Ingestion Pinckaers, Philippe J. M. Trommelen, Jorn Snijders, Tim van Loon, Luc J. C. Sports Med Review Article There is a global trend of an increased interest in plant-based diets. This includes an increase in the consumption of plant-based proteins at the expense of animal-based proteins. Plant-derived proteins are now also frequently applied in sports nutrition. So far, we have learned that the ingestion of plant-derived proteins, such as soy and wheat protein, result in lower post-prandial muscle protein synthesis responses when compared with the ingestion of an equivalent amount of animal-based protein. The lesser anabolic properties of plant-based versus animal-derived proteins may be attributed to differences in their protein digestion and amino acid absorption kinetics, as well as to differences in amino acid composition between these protein sources. Most plant-based proteins have a low essential amino acid content and are often deficient in one or more specific amino acids, such as lysine and methionine. However, there are large differences in amino acid composition between various plant-derived proteins or plant-based protein sources. So far, only a few studies have directly compared the muscle protein synthetic response following the ingestion of a plant-derived protein versus a high(er) quality animal-derived protein. The proposed lower anabolic properties of plant- versus animal-derived proteins may be compensated for by (i) consuming a greater amount of the plant-derived protein or plant-based protein source to compensate for the lesser quality; (ii) using specific blends of plant-based proteins to create a more balanced amino acid profile; (iii) fortifying the plant-based protein (source) with the specific free amino acid(s) that is (are) deficient. Clinical studies are warranted to assess the anabolic properties of the various plant-derived proteins and their protein sources in vivo in humans and to identify the factors that may or may not compromise the capacity to stimulate post-prandial muscle protein synthesis rates. Such work is needed to determine whether the transition towards a more plant-based diet is accompanied by a transition towards greater dietary protein intake requirements. Springer International Publishing 2021-09-13 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8566416/ /pubmed/34515966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-021-01540-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Pinckaers, Philippe J. M.
Trommelen, Jorn
Snijders, Tim
van Loon, Luc J. C.
The Anabolic Response to Plant-Based Protein Ingestion
title The Anabolic Response to Plant-Based Protein Ingestion
title_full The Anabolic Response to Plant-Based Protein Ingestion
title_fullStr The Anabolic Response to Plant-Based Protein Ingestion
title_full_unstemmed The Anabolic Response to Plant-Based Protein Ingestion
title_short The Anabolic Response to Plant-Based Protein Ingestion
title_sort anabolic response to plant-based protein ingestion
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8566416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34515966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-021-01540-8
work_keys_str_mv AT pinckaersphilippejm theanabolicresponsetoplantbasedproteiningestion
AT trommelenjorn theanabolicresponsetoplantbasedproteiningestion
AT snijderstim theanabolicresponsetoplantbasedproteiningestion
AT vanloonlucjc theanabolicresponsetoplantbasedproteiningestion
AT pinckaersphilippejm anabolicresponsetoplantbasedproteiningestion
AT trommelenjorn anabolicresponsetoplantbasedproteiningestion
AT snijderstim anabolicresponsetoplantbasedproteiningestion
AT vanloonlucjc anabolicresponsetoplantbasedproteiningestion