Cargando…

Comparing Automated Morphology Quantification Software on Dendrites of Uninjured and Injured Drosophila Neurons

Dendrites shape inputs and integration of depolarization that controls neuronal activity in the nervous system. Neuron pathologies can damage dendrite architecture and cause abnormalities in morphologies after injury. Dendrite regeneration can be quantified by various parameters, including total den...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nguyen, Carolee, Thompson-Peer, Katherine L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8566419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34342808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12021-021-09532-9
_version_ 1784594006579085312
author Nguyen, Carolee
Thompson-Peer, Katherine L.
author_facet Nguyen, Carolee
Thompson-Peer, Katherine L.
author_sort Nguyen, Carolee
collection PubMed
description Dendrites shape inputs and integration of depolarization that controls neuronal activity in the nervous system. Neuron pathologies can damage dendrite architecture and cause abnormalities in morphologies after injury. Dendrite regeneration can be quantified by various parameters, including total dendrite length and number of dendrite branches using manual or automated image analysis approaches. However, manual quantification is tedious and time consuming and automated approaches are often trained using wildtype neurons, making them poorly suited for analysis of genetically manipulated or injured dendrite arbors. In this study, we tested how well automated image analysis software performed on class IV Drosophila neurons, which have several hundred individual dendrite branches. We applied each software to automatically quantify features of uninjured neurons and neurons that regenerated new dendrites after injury. Regenerated arbors exhibit defects across multiple features of dendrite morphology, which makes them challenging for automated pipelines to analyze. We compared the performances of three automated pipelines against manual quantification using Simple Neurite Tracer in ImageJ: one that is commercially available (Imaris) and two developed by independent research groups (DeTerm and Tireless Tracing Genie). Out of the three software tested, we determined that Imaris is the most efficient at reconstructing dendrite architecture, but does not accurately measure total dendrite length even after intensive manual editing. Imaris outperforms both DeTerm and Tireless Tracing Genie for counting dendrite branches, and is better able to recreate previous conclusions from this same dataset. This thorough comparison of strengths and weaknesses of each software demonstrates their utility for analyzing regenerated neuron phenotypes in future studies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12021-021-09532-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8566419
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85664192021-11-15 Comparing Automated Morphology Quantification Software on Dendrites of Uninjured and Injured Drosophila Neurons Nguyen, Carolee Thompson-Peer, Katherine L. Neuroinformatics Original Article Dendrites shape inputs and integration of depolarization that controls neuronal activity in the nervous system. Neuron pathologies can damage dendrite architecture and cause abnormalities in morphologies after injury. Dendrite regeneration can be quantified by various parameters, including total dendrite length and number of dendrite branches using manual or automated image analysis approaches. However, manual quantification is tedious and time consuming and automated approaches are often trained using wildtype neurons, making them poorly suited for analysis of genetically manipulated or injured dendrite arbors. In this study, we tested how well automated image analysis software performed on class IV Drosophila neurons, which have several hundred individual dendrite branches. We applied each software to automatically quantify features of uninjured neurons and neurons that regenerated new dendrites after injury. Regenerated arbors exhibit defects across multiple features of dendrite morphology, which makes them challenging for automated pipelines to analyze. We compared the performances of three automated pipelines against manual quantification using Simple Neurite Tracer in ImageJ: one that is commercially available (Imaris) and two developed by independent research groups (DeTerm and Tireless Tracing Genie). Out of the three software tested, we determined that Imaris is the most efficient at reconstructing dendrite architecture, but does not accurately measure total dendrite length even after intensive manual editing. Imaris outperforms both DeTerm and Tireless Tracing Genie for counting dendrite branches, and is better able to recreate previous conclusions from this same dataset. This thorough comparison of strengths and weaknesses of each software demonstrates their utility for analyzing regenerated neuron phenotypes in future studies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12021-021-09532-9. Springer US 2021-08-03 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8566419/ /pubmed/34342808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12021-021-09532-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Nguyen, Carolee
Thompson-Peer, Katherine L.
Comparing Automated Morphology Quantification Software on Dendrites of Uninjured and Injured Drosophila Neurons
title Comparing Automated Morphology Quantification Software on Dendrites of Uninjured and Injured Drosophila Neurons
title_full Comparing Automated Morphology Quantification Software on Dendrites of Uninjured and Injured Drosophila Neurons
title_fullStr Comparing Automated Morphology Quantification Software on Dendrites of Uninjured and Injured Drosophila Neurons
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Automated Morphology Quantification Software on Dendrites of Uninjured and Injured Drosophila Neurons
title_short Comparing Automated Morphology Quantification Software on Dendrites of Uninjured and Injured Drosophila Neurons
title_sort comparing automated morphology quantification software on dendrites of uninjured and injured drosophila neurons
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8566419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34342808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12021-021-09532-9
work_keys_str_mv AT nguyencarolee comparingautomatedmorphologyquantificationsoftwareondendritesofuninjuredandinjureddrosophilaneurons
AT thompsonpeerkatherinel comparingautomatedmorphologyquantificationsoftwareondendritesofuninjuredandinjureddrosophilaneurons