Cargando…

Feasibility and Accuracy of a Fully Automated Right Ventricular Quantification Software With Three-Dimensional Echocardiography: Comparison With Cardiac Magnetic Resonance

Background: A novel, fully automated right ventricular (RV) software for three-dimensional quantification of RV volumes and function was developed. The direct comparison of the software performance with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) was limited. Therefore, the aim of this study was to test the fe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmad, Ashfaq, Li, He, Wan, Xiaojing, Zhong, Yi, Zhang, Yanting, Liu, Juanjuan, Gao, Ying, Qian, Mingzhu, Lin, Yixia, Yi, Luyang, Zhang, Li, Li, Yuman, Xie, Mingxing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8566539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34746251
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.732893
_version_ 1784594035785072640
author Ahmad, Ashfaq
Li, He
Wan, Xiaojing
Zhong, Yi
Zhang, Yanting
Liu, Juanjuan
Gao, Ying
Qian, Mingzhu
Lin, Yixia
Yi, Luyang
Zhang, Li
Li, Yuman
Xie, Mingxing
author_facet Ahmad, Ashfaq
Li, He
Wan, Xiaojing
Zhong, Yi
Zhang, Yanting
Liu, Juanjuan
Gao, Ying
Qian, Mingzhu
Lin, Yixia
Yi, Luyang
Zhang, Li
Li, Yuman
Xie, Mingxing
author_sort Ahmad, Ashfaq
collection PubMed
description Background: A novel, fully automated right ventricular (RV) software for three-dimensional quantification of RV volumes and function was developed. The direct comparison of the software performance with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) was limited. Therefore, the aim of this study was to test the feasibility, accuracy, and reproducibility of a fully automated RV quantification software against CMR imaging as a reference. Methods: A total of 170 patients who underwent both CMR and three-dimensional echocardiography were enrolled. RV end-diastolic volume (RVEDV), RV end-systolic volume (RVESV), and RV ejection fraction (RVEF) were obtained using fully automated three-dimensional RV quantification software and compared with a CMR reference. For inter-technical agreement, Spearman correlation and Bland–Altman analysis were used. Results: The fully automated RV quantification software was feasible in 149 patients. RVEDV and RVESV were underestimated, and RVEF was overestimated compared with CMR values. RV measurements obtained from the manual editing method correlated better with CMR values than that without manual editing (RVEDV, 0.924 vs. 0.794: RVESV, 0.955 vs. 0.854; RVEF, 0.941 vs. 0.781 respectively, all p < 0.0001) with less bias and narrower limit of agreement (LOA). The bias and LOA for RV volumes and EF using the automated software without and with manual editing were greater in patients with severely impaired RV function or low frame rate than those with normal and mild impaired RV function, or high frame rate. The fully automated RV three-dimensional measurements were highly reproducible. Conclusion: The novel fully automated RV software shows good feasibility and reproducibility, and the measurements had a high correlation with CMR values. These findings support the routine application of the novel 3D automated RV software in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8566539
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85665392021-11-05 Feasibility and Accuracy of a Fully Automated Right Ventricular Quantification Software With Three-Dimensional Echocardiography: Comparison With Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Ahmad, Ashfaq Li, He Wan, Xiaojing Zhong, Yi Zhang, Yanting Liu, Juanjuan Gao, Ying Qian, Mingzhu Lin, Yixia Yi, Luyang Zhang, Li Li, Yuman Xie, Mingxing Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine Background: A novel, fully automated right ventricular (RV) software for three-dimensional quantification of RV volumes and function was developed. The direct comparison of the software performance with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) was limited. Therefore, the aim of this study was to test the feasibility, accuracy, and reproducibility of a fully automated RV quantification software against CMR imaging as a reference. Methods: A total of 170 patients who underwent both CMR and three-dimensional echocardiography were enrolled. RV end-diastolic volume (RVEDV), RV end-systolic volume (RVESV), and RV ejection fraction (RVEF) were obtained using fully automated three-dimensional RV quantification software and compared with a CMR reference. For inter-technical agreement, Spearman correlation and Bland–Altman analysis were used. Results: The fully automated RV quantification software was feasible in 149 patients. RVEDV and RVESV were underestimated, and RVEF was overestimated compared with CMR values. RV measurements obtained from the manual editing method correlated better with CMR values than that without manual editing (RVEDV, 0.924 vs. 0.794: RVESV, 0.955 vs. 0.854; RVEF, 0.941 vs. 0.781 respectively, all p < 0.0001) with less bias and narrower limit of agreement (LOA). The bias and LOA for RV volumes and EF using the automated software without and with manual editing were greater in patients with severely impaired RV function or low frame rate than those with normal and mild impaired RV function, or high frame rate. The fully automated RV three-dimensional measurements were highly reproducible. Conclusion: The novel fully automated RV software shows good feasibility and reproducibility, and the measurements had a high correlation with CMR values. These findings support the routine application of the novel 3D automated RV software in clinical practice. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8566539/ /pubmed/34746251 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.732893 Text en Copyright © 2021 Ahmad, Li, Wan, Zhong, Zhang, Liu, Gao, Qian, Lin, Yi, Zhang, Li and Xie. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Ahmad, Ashfaq
Li, He
Wan, Xiaojing
Zhong, Yi
Zhang, Yanting
Liu, Juanjuan
Gao, Ying
Qian, Mingzhu
Lin, Yixia
Yi, Luyang
Zhang, Li
Li, Yuman
Xie, Mingxing
Feasibility and Accuracy of a Fully Automated Right Ventricular Quantification Software With Three-Dimensional Echocardiography: Comparison With Cardiac Magnetic Resonance
title Feasibility and Accuracy of a Fully Automated Right Ventricular Quantification Software With Three-Dimensional Echocardiography: Comparison With Cardiac Magnetic Resonance
title_full Feasibility and Accuracy of a Fully Automated Right Ventricular Quantification Software With Three-Dimensional Echocardiography: Comparison With Cardiac Magnetic Resonance
title_fullStr Feasibility and Accuracy of a Fully Automated Right Ventricular Quantification Software With Three-Dimensional Echocardiography: Comparison With Cardiac Magnetic Resonance
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility and Accuracy of a Fully Automated Right Ventricular Quantification Software With Three-Dimensional Echocardiography: Comparison With Cardiac Magnetic Resonance
title_short Feasibility and Accuracy of a Fully Automated Right Ventricular Quantification Software With Three-Dimensional Echocardiography: Comparison With Cardiac Magnetic Resonance
title_sort feasibility and accuracy of a fully automated right ventricular quantification software with three-dimensional echocardiography: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8566539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34746251
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.732893
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmadashfaq feasibilityandaccuracyofafullyautomatedrightventricularquantificationsoftwarewiththreedimensionalechocardiographycomparisonwithcardiacmagneticresonance
AT lihe feasibilityandaccuracyofafullyautomatedrightventricularquantificationsoftwarewiththreedimensionalechocardiographycomparisonwithcardiacmagneticresonance
AT wanxiaojing feasibilityandaccuracyofafullyautomatedrightventricularquantificationsoftwarewiththreedimensionalechocardiographycomparisonwithcardiacmagneticresonance
AT zhongyi feasibilityandaccuracyofafullyautomatedrightventricularquantificationsoftwarewiththreedimensionalechocardiographycomparisonwithcardiacmagneticresonance
AT zhangyanting feasibilityandaccuracyofafullyautomatedrightventricularquantificationsoftwarewiththreedimensionalechocardiographycomparisonwithcardiacmagneticresonance
AT liujuanjuan feasibilityandaccuracyofafullyautomatedrightventricularquantificationsoftwarewiththreedimensionalechocardiographycomparisonwithcardiacmagneticresonance
AT gaoying feasibilityandaccuracyofafullyautomatedrightventricularquantificationsoftwarewiththreedimensionalechocardiographycomparisonwithcardiacmagneticresonance
AT qianmingzhu feasibilityandaccuracyofafullyautomatedrightventricularquantificationsoftwarewiththreedimensionalechocardiographycomparisonwithcardiacmagneticresonance
AT linyixia feasibilityandaccuracyofafullyautomatedrightventricularquantificationsoftwarewiththreedimensionalechocardiographycomparisonwithcardiacmagneticresonance
AT yiluyang feasibilityandaccuracyofafullyautomatedrightventricularquantificationsoftwarewiththreedimensionalechocardiographycomparisonwithcardiacmagneticresonance
AT zhangli feasibilityandaccuracyofafullyautomatedrightventricularquantificationsoftwarewiththreedimensionalechocardiographycomparisonwithcardiacmagneticresonance
AT liyuman feasibilityandaccuracyofafullyautomatedrightventricularquantificationsoftwarewiththreedimensionalechocardiographycomparisonwithcardiacmagneticresonance
AT xiemingxing feasibilityandaccuracyofafullyautomatedrightventricularquantificationsoftwarewiththreedimensionalechocardiographycomparisonwithcardiacmagneticresonance