Cargando…

Sound Localization in Single-Sided Deaf Participants Provided With a Cochlear Implant

Spatial hearing is crucial in real life but deteriorates in participants with severe sensorineural hearing loss or single-sided deafness. This ability can potentially be improved with a unilateral cochlear implant (CI). The present study investigated measures of sound localization in participants wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ludwig, Alexandra Annemarie, Meuret, Sylvia, Battmer, Rolf-Dieter, Schönwiesner, Marc, Fuchs, Michael, Ernst, Arne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8566543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34744930
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.753339
_version_ 1784594036743471104
author Ludwig, Alexandra Annemarie
Meuret, Sylvia
Battmer, Rolf-Dieter
Schönwiesner, Marc
Fuchs, Michael
Ernst, Arne
author_facet Ludwig, Alexandra Annemarie
Meuret, Sylvia
Battmer, Rolf-Dieter
Schönwiesner, Marc
Fuchs, Michael
Ernst, Arne
author_sort Ludwig, Alexandra Annemarie
collection PubMed
description Spatial hearing is crucial in real life but deteriorates in participants with severe sensorineural hearing loss or single-sided deafness. This ability can potentially be improved with a unilateral cochlear implant (CI). The present study investigated measures of sound localization in participants with single-sided deafness provided with a CI. Sound localization was measured separately at eight loudspeaker positions (4°, 30°, 60°, and 90°) on the CI side and on the normal-hearing side. Low- and high-frequency noise bursts were used in the tests to investigate possible differences in the processing of interaural time and level differences. Data were compared to normal-hearing adults aged between 20 and 83. In addition, the benefit of the CI in speech understanding in noise was compared to the localization ability. Fifteen out of 18 participants were able to localize signals on the CI side and on the normal-hearing side, although performance was highly variable across participants. Three participants always pointed to the normal-hearing side, irrespective of the location of the signal. The comparison with control data showed that participants had particular difficulties localizing sounds at frontal locations and on the CI side. In contrast to most previous results, participants were able to localize low-frequency signals, although they localized high-frequency signals more accurately. Speech understanding in noise was better with the CI compared to testing without CI, but only at a position where the CI also improved sound localization. Our data suggest that a CI can, to a large extent, restore localization in participants with single-sided deafness. Difficulties may remain at frontal locations and on the CI side. However, speech understanding in noise improves when wearing the CI. The treatment with a CI in these participants might provide real-world benefits, such as improved orientation in traffic and speech understanding in difficult listening situations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8566543
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85665432021-11-05 Sound Localization in Single-Sided Deaf Participants Provided With a Cochlear Implant Ludwig, Alexandra Annemarie Meuret, Sylvia Battmer, Rolf-Dieter Schönwiesner, Marc Fuchs, Michael Ernst, Arne Front Psychol Psychology Spatial hearing is crucial in real life but deteriorates in participants with severe sensorineural hearing loss or single-sided deafness. This ability can potentially be improved with a unilateral cochlear implant (CI). The present study investigated measures of sound localization in participants with single-sided deafness provided with a CI. Sound localization was measured separately at eight loudspeaker positions (4°, 30°, 60°, and 90°) on the CI side and on the normal-hearing side. Low- and high-frequency noise bursts were used in the tests to investigate possible differences in the processing of interaural time and level differences. Data were compared to normal-hearing adults aged between 20 and 83. In addition, the benefit of the CI in speech understanding in noise was compared to the localization ability. Fifteen out of 18 participants were able to localize signals on the CI side and on the normal-hearing side, although performance was highly variable across participants. Three participants always pointed to the normal-hearing side, irrespective of the location of the signal. The comparison with control data showed that participants had particular difficulties localizing sounds at frontal locations and on the CI side. In contrast to most previous results, participants were able to localize low-frequency signals, although they localized high-frequency signals more accurately. Speech understanding in noise was better with the CI compared to testing without CI, but only at a position where the CI also improved sound localization. Our data suggest that a CI can, to a large extent, restore localization in participants with single-sided deafness. Difficulties may remain at frontal locations and on the CI side. However, speech understanding in noise improves when wearing the CI. The treatment with a CI in these participants might provide real-world benefits, such as improved orientation in traffic and speech understanding in difficult listening situations. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8566543/ /pubmed/34744930 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.753339 Text en Copyright © 2021 Ludwig, Meuret, Battmer, Schönwiesner, Fuchs and Ernst. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Ludwig, Alexandra Annemarie
Meuret, Sylvia
Battmer, Rolf-Dieter
Schönwiesner, Marc
Fuchs, Michael
Ernst, Arne
Sound Localization in Single-Sided Deaf Participants Provided With a Cochlear Implant
title Sound Localization in Single-Sided Deaf Participants Provided With a Cochlear Implant
title_full Sound Localization in Single-Sided Deaf Participants Provided With a Cochlear Implant
title_fullStr Sound Localization in Single-Sided Deaf Participants Provided With a Cochlear Implant
title_full_unstemmed Sound Localization in Single-Sided Deaf Participants Provided With a Cochlear Implant
title_short Sound Localization in Single-Sided Deaf Participants Provided With a Cochlear Implant
title_sort sound localization in single-sided deaf participants provided with a cochlear implant
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8566543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34744930
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.753339
work_keys_str_mv AT ludwigalexandraannemarie soundlocalizationinsinglesideddeafparticipantsprovidedwithacochlearimplant
AT meuretsylvia soundlocalizationinsinglesideddeafparticipantsprovidedwithacochlearimplant
AT battmerrolfdieter soundlocalizationinsinglesideddeafparticipantsprovidedwithacochlearimplant
AT schonwiesnermarc soundlocalizationinsinglesideddeafparticipantsprovidedwithacochlearimplant
AT fuchsmichael soundlocalizationinsinglesideddeafparticipantsprovidedwithacochlearimplant
AT ernstarne soundlocalizationinsinglesideddeafparticipantsprovidedwithacochlearimplant