Cargando…

Risk-benefit analysis of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine in Australia using a Bayesian network modelling framework

Thrombosis and Thrombocytopenia Syndrome (TTS) has been associated with the AstraZencea (AZ) COVID-19 vaccine (Vaxzevria). Australia has reported low TTS incidence of < 3/100,000 after the first dose, with case fatality rate (CFR) of 5–6%. Risk-benefit analysis of vaccination has been challenging...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lau, Colleen L., Mayfield, Helen J., Sinclair, Jane E., Brown, Samuel J., Waller, Michael, Enjeti, Anoop K., Baird, Andrew, Short, Kirsty R., Mengersen, Kerrie, Litt, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8566665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34810000
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.10.079
_version_ 1784594063212675072
author Lau, Colleen L.
Mayfield, Helen J.
Sinclair, Jane E.
Brown, Samuel J.
Waller, Michael
Enjeti, Anoop K.
Baird, Andrew
Short, Kirsty R.
Mengersen, Kerrie
Litt, John
author_facet Lau, Colleen L.
Mayfield, Helen J.
Sinclair, Jane E.
Brown, Samuel J.
Waller, Michael
Enjeti, Anoop K.
Baird, Andrew
Short, Kirsty R.
Mengersen, Kerrie
Litt, John
author_sort Lau, Colleen L.
collection PubMed
description Thrombosis and Thrombocytopenia Syndrome (TTS) has been associated with the AstraZencea (AZ) COVID-19 vaccine (Vaxzevria). Australia has reported low TTS incidence of < 3/100,000 after the first dose, with case fatality rate (CFR) of 5–6%. Risk-benefit analysis of vaccination has been challenging because of rapidly evolving data, changing levels of transmission, and variation in rates of TTS, COVID-19, and CFR between age groups. We aim to optimise risk–benefit analysis by developing a model that enables inputs to be updated rapidly as evidence evolves. A Bayesian network was used to integrate local and international data, government reports, published literature and expert opinion. The model estimates probabilities of outcomes under different scenarios of age, sex, low/medium/high transmission (0.05%/0.45%/5.76% of population infected over 6 months), SARS-CoV-2 variant, vaccine doses, and vaccine effectiveness. We used the model to compare estimated deaths from AZ vaccine-associated TTS with i) COVID-19 deaths prevented under different scenarios, and ii) deaths from COVID-19 related atypical severe blood clots (cerebral venous sinus thrombosis & portal vein thrombosis). For a million people aged ≥ 70 years where 70% received first dose and 35% received two doses, our model estimated < 1 death from TTS, 25 deaths prevented under low transmission, and > 3000 deaths prevented under high transmission. Risks versus benefits varied significantly between age groups and transmission levels. Under high transmission, deaths prevented by AZ vaccine far exceed deaths from TTS (by 8 to > 4500 times depending on age). Probability of dying from COVID-related atypical severe blood clots was 58–126 times higher (depending on age and sex) than dying from TTS. To our knowledge, this is the first example of the use of Bayesian networks for risk–benefit analysis for a COVID-19 vaccine. The model can be rapidly updated to incorporate new data, adapted for other countries, extended to other outcomes (e.g., severe disease), or used for other vaccines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8566665
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85666652021-11-04 Risk-benefit analysis of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine in Australia using a Bayesian network modelling framework Lau, Colleen L. Mayfield, Helen J. Sinclair, Jane E. Brown, Samuel J. Waller, Michael Enjeti, Anoop K. Baird, Andrew Short, Kirsty R. Mengersen, Kerrie Litt, John Vaccine Article Thrombosis and Thrombocytopenia Syndrome (TTS) has been associated with the AstraZencea (AZ) COVID-19 vaccine (Vaxzevria). Australia has reported low TTS incidence of < 3/100,000 after the first dose, with case fatality rate (CFR) of 5–6%. Risk-benefit analysis of vaccination has been challenging because of rapidly evolving data, changing levels of transmission, and variation in rates of TTS, COVID-19, and CFR between age groups. We aim to optimise risk–benefit analysis by developing a model that enables inputs to be updated rapidly as evidence evolves. A Bayesian network was used to integrate local and international data, government reports, published literature and expert opinion. The model estimates probabilities of outcomes under different scenarios of age, sex, low/medium/high transmission (0.05%/0.45%/5.76% of population infected over 6 months), SARS-CoV-2 variant, vaccine doses, and vaccine effectiveness. We used the model to compare estimated deaths from AZ vaccine-associated TTS with i) COVID-19 deaths prevented under different scenarios, and ii) deaths from COVID-19 related atypical severe blood clots (cerebral venous sinus thrombosis & portal vein thrombosis). For a million people aged ≥ 70 years where 70% received first dose and 35% received two doses, our model estimated < 1 death from TTS, 25 deaths prevented under low transmission, and > 3000 deaths prevented under high transmission. Risks versus benefits varied significantly between age groups and transmission levels. Under high transmission, deaths prevented by AZ vaccine far exceed deaths from TTS (by 8 to > 4500 times depending on age). Probability of dying from COVID-related atypical severe blood clots was 58–126 times higher (depending on age and sex) than dying from TTS. To our knowledge, this is the first example of the use of Bayesian networks for risk–benefit analysis for a COVID-19 vaccine. The model can be rapidly updated to incorporate new data, adapted for other countries, extended to other outcomes (e.g., severe disease), or used for other vaccines. The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2021-12-17 2021-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8566665/ /pubmed/34810000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.10.079 Text en © 2021 The Authors Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Lau, Colleen L.
Mayfield, Helen J.
Sinclair, Jane E.
Brown, Samuel J.
Waller, Michael
Enjeti, Anoop K.
Baird, Andrew
Short, Kirsty R.
Mengersen, Kerrie
Litt, John
Risk-benefit analysis of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine in Australia using a Bayesian network modelling framework
title Risk-benefit analysis of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine in Australia using a Bayesian network modelling framework
title_full Risk-benefit analysis of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine in Australia using a Bayesian network modelling framework
title_fullStr Risk-benefit analysis of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine in Australia using a Bayesian network modelling framework
title_full_unstemmed Risk-benefit analysis of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine in Australia using a Bayesian network modelling framework
title_short Risk-benefit analysis of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine in Australia using a Bayesian network modelling framework
title_sort risk-benefit analysis of the astrazeneca covid-19 vaccine in australia using a bayesian network modelling framework
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8566665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34810000
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.10.079
work_keys_str_mv AT laucolleenl riskbenefitanalysisoftheastrazenecacovid19vaccineinaustraliausingabayesiannetworkmodellingframework
AT mayfieldhelenj riskbenefitanalysisoftheastrazenecacovid19vaccineinaustraliausingabayesiannetworkmodellingframework
AT sinclairjanee riskbenefitanalysisoftheastrazenecacovid19vaccineinaustraliausingabayesiannetworkmodellingframework
AT brownsamuelj riskbenefitanalysisoftheastrazenecacovid19vaccineinaustraliausingabayesiannetworkmodellingframework
AT wallermichael riskbenefitanalysisoftheastrazenecacovid19vaccineinaustraliausingabayesiannetworkmodellingframework
AT enjetianoopk riskbenefitanalysisoftheastrazenecacovid19vaccineinaustraliausingabayesiannetworkmodellingframework
AT bairdandrew riskbenefitanalysisoftheastrazenecacovid19vaccineinaustraliausingabayesiannetworkmodellingframework
AT shortkirstyr riskbenefitanalysisoftheastrazenecacovid19vaccineinaustraliausingabayesiannetworkmodellingframework
AT mengersenkerrie riskbenefitanalysisoftheastrazenecacovid19vaccineinaustraliausingabayesiannetworkmodellingframework
AT littjohn riskbenefitanalysisoftheastrazenecacovid19vaccineinaustraliausingabayesiannetworkmodellingframework