Cargando…
The Oncology Safety of Diagnostic Hysteroscopy in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND: Hysteroscopy is becoming a common method for the diagnosis of uterine disorders in developed countries. However, hysteroscopy might worsen the prognosis of endometrial cancer because it could cause cancer dissemination into the peritoneal cavity through the fallopian tubes. Objective: Th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8566916/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34745963 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.742761 |
_version_ | 1784594121121333248 |
---|---|
author | Du, Yi Xu, Yu Qin, Zhaojuan Sun, Liang Chen, Yali Han, Ling Zheng, Ai |
author_facet | Du, Yi Xu, Yu Qin, Zhaojuan Sun, Liang Chen, Yali Han, Ling Zheng, Ai |
author_sort | Du, Yi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Hysteroscopy is becoming a common method for the diagnosis of uterine disorders in developed countries. However, hysteroscopy might worsen the prognosis of endometrial cancer because it could cause cancer dissemination into the peritoneal cavity through the fallopian tubes. Objective: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to explore the oncological safety of hysteroscopy for early-stage endometrial cancer. SEARCH STRATEGY: Eligible studies were obtained from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to September 22, 2020. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies which compared the oncological safety of hysteroscopy with other methods were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: A total of 3980 patients were included in this study, of whom1357 patients had undergone hysteroscopy and2623 had not. MAIN RESULTS: There was no significant association between hysteroscopy and worse prognosis in early-stage endometrial cancer [disease-free survival: log risk ratio(logRR) -0.22; 95% confidence interval (CI), -0.54 to 0.1; p=0.97; overall survival: logRR 0.03; 95% CI, -0.05 to 0.11; p=0.02; disease-specific survival: logRR 0.03; 95% CI, -0.03 to 0.10; p=0.00]. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that hysteroscopy is a safe diagnostic and treatment method, and has no significant effect on the prognosis of early-stage endometrial cancer. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020193696. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8566916 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85669162021-11-05 The Oncology Safety of Diagnostic Hysteroscopy in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Du, Yi Xu, Yu Qin, Zhaojuan Sun, Liang Chen, Yali Han, Ling Zheng, Ai Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Hysteroscopy is becoming a common method for the diagnosis of uterine disorders in developed countries. However, hysteroscopy might worsen the prognosis of endometrial cancer because it could cause cancer dissemination into the peritoneal cavity through the fallopian tubes. Objective: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to explore the oncological safety of hysteroscopy for early-stage endometrial cancer. SEARCH STRATEGY: Eligible studies were obtained from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to September 22, 2020. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies which compared the oncological safety of hysteroscopy with other methods were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: A total of 3980 patients were included in this study, of whom1357 patients had undergone hysteroscopy and2623 had not. MAIN RESULTS: There was no significant association between hysteroscopy and worse prognosis in early-stage endometrial cancer [disease-free survival: log risk ratio(logRR) -0.22; 95% confidence interval (CI), -0.54 to 0.1; p=0.97; overall survival: logRR 0.03; 95% CI, -0.05 to 0.11; p=0.02; disease-specific survival: logRR 0.03; 95% CI, -0.03 to 0.10; p=0.00]. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that hysteroscopy is a safe diagnostic and treatment method, and has no significant effect on the prognosis of early-stage endometrial cancer. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020193696. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8566916/ /pubmed/34745963 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.742761 Text en Copyright © 2021 Du, Xu, Qin, Sun, Chen, Han and Zheng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Du, Yi Xu, Yu Qin, Zhaojuan Sun, Liang Chen, Yali Han, Ling Zheng, Ai The Oncology Safety of Diagnostic Hysteroscopy in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | The Oncology Safety of Diagnostic Hysteroscopy in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | The Oncology Safety of Diagnostic Hysteroscopy in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | The Oncology Safety of Diagnostic Hysteroscopy in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The Oncology Safety of Diagnostic Hysteroscopy in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | The Oncology Safety of Diagnostic Hysteroscopy in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | oncology safety of diagnostic hysteroscopy in early-stage endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8566916/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34745963 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.742761 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT duyi theoncologysafetyofdiagnostichysteroscopyinearlystageendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xuyu theoncologysafetyofdiagnostichysteroscopyinearlystageendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT qinzhaojuan theoncologysafetyofdiagnostichysteroscopyinearlystageendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sunliang theoncologysafetyofdiagnostichysteroscopyinearlystageendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chenyali theoncologysafetyofdiagnostichysteroscopyinearlystageendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hanling theoncologysafetyofdiagnostichysteroscopyinearlystageendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhengai theoncologysafetyofdiagnostichysteroscopyinearlystageendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT duyi oncologysafetyofdiagnostichysteroscopyinearlystageendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xuyu oncologysafetyofdiagnostichysteroscopyinearlystageendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT qinzhaojuan oncologysafetyofdiagnostichysteroscopyinearlystageendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sunliang oncologysafetyofdiagnostichysteroscopyinearlystageendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chenyali oncologysafetyofdiagnostichysteroscopyinearlystageendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hanling oncologysafetyofdiagnostichysteroscopyinearlystageendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhengai oncologysafetyofdiagnostichysteroscopyinearlystageendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |