Cargando…

The Oncology Safety of Diagnostic Hysteroscopy in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Hysteroscopy is becoming a common method for the diagnosis of uterine disorders in developed countries. However, hysteroscopy might worsen the prognosis of endometrial cancer because it could cause cancer dissemination into the peritoneal cavity through the fallopian tubes. Objective: Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Du, Yi, Xu, Yu, Qin, Zhaojuan, Sun, Liang, Chen, Yali, Han, Ling, Zheng, Ai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8566916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34745963
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.742761
_version_ 1784594121121333248
author Du, Yi
Xu, Yu
Qin, Zhaojuan
Sun, Liang
Chen, Yali
Han, Ling
Zheng, Ai
author_facet Du, Yi
Xu, Yu
Qin, Zhaojuan
Sun, Liang
Chen, Yali
Han, Ling
Zheng, Ai
author_sort Du, Yi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hysteroscopy is becoming a common method for the diagnosis of uterine disorders in developed countries. However, hysteroscopy might worsen the prognosis of endometrial cancer because it could cause cancer dissemination into the peritoneal cavity through the fallopian tubes. Objective: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to explore the oncological safety of hysteroscopy for early-stage endometrial cancer. SEARCH STRATEGY: Eligible studies were obtained from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to September 22, 2020. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies which compared the oncological safety of hysteroscopy with other methods were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: A total of 3980 patients were included in this study, of whom1357 patients had undergone hysteroscopy and2623 had not. MAIN RESULTS: There was no significant association between hysteroscopy and worse prognosis in early-stage endometrial cancer [disease-free survival: log risk ratio(logRR) -0.22; 95% confidence interval (CI), -0.54 to 0.1; p=0.97; overall survival: logRR 0.03; 95% CI, -0.05 to 0.11; p=0.02; disease-specific survival: logRR 0.03; 95% CI, -0.03 to 0.10; p=0.00]. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that hysteroscopy is a safe diagnostic and treatment method, and has no significant effect on the prognosis of early-stage endometrial cancer. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020193696.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8566916
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85669162021-11-05 The Oncology Safety of Diagnostic Hysteroscopy in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Du, Yi Xu, Yu Qin, Zhaojuan Sun, Liang Chen, Yali Han, Ling Zheng, Ai Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Hysteroscopy is becoming a common method for the diagnosis of uterine disorders in developed countries. However, hysteroscopy might worsen the prognosis of endometrial cancer because it could cause cancer dissemination into the peritoneal cavity through the fallopian tubes. Objective: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to explore the oncological safety of hysteroscopy for early-stage endometrial cancer. SEARCH STRATEGY: Eligible studies were obtained from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to September 22, 2020. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies which compared the oncological safety of hysteroscopy with other methods were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: A total of 3980 patients were included in this study, of whom1357 patients had undergone hysteroscopy and2623 had not. MAIN RESULTS: There was no significant association between hysteroscopy and worse prognosis in early-stage endometrial cancer [disease-free survival: log risk ratio(logRR) -0.22; 95% confidence interval (CI), -0.54 to 0.1; p=0.97; overall survival: logRR 0.03; 95% CI, -0.05 to 0.11; p=0.02; disease-specific survival: logRR 0.03; 95% CI, -0.03 to 0.10; p=0.00]. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that hysteroscopy is a safe diagnostic and treatment method, and has no significant effect on the prognosis of early-stage endometrial cancer. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020193696. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8566916/ /pubmed/34745963 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.742761 Text en Copyright © 2021 Du, Xu, Qin, Sun, Chen, Han and Zheng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Du, Yi
Xu, Yu
Qin, Zhaojuan
Sun, Liang
Chen, Yali
Han, Ling
Zheng, Ai
The Oncology Safety of Diagnostic Hysteroscopy in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title The Oncology Safety of Diagnostic Hysteroscopy in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full The Oncology Safety of Diagnostic Hysteroscopy in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr The Oncology Safety of Diagnostic Hysteroscopy in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Oncology Safety of Diagnostic Hysteroscopy in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short The Oncology Safety of Diagnostic Hysteroscopy in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort oncology safety of diagnostic hysteroscopy in early-stage endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8566916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34745963
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.742761
work_keys_str_mv AT duyi theoncologysafetyofdiagnostichysteroscopyinearlystageendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xuyu theoncologysafetyofdiagnostichysteroscopyinearlystageendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT qinzhaojuan theoncologysafetyofdiagnostichysteroscopyinearlystageendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sunliang theoncologysafetyofdiagnostichysteroscopyinearlystageendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenyali theoncologysafetyofdiagnostichysteroscopyinearlystageendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hanling theoncologysafetyofdiagnostichysteroscopyinearlystageendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhengai theoncologysafetyofdiagnostichysteroscopyinearlystageendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT duyi oncologysafetyofdiagnostichysteroscopyinearlystageendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xuyu oncologysafetyofdiagnostichysteroscopyinearlystageendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT qinzhaojuan oncologysafetyofdiagnostichysteroscopyinearlystageendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sunliang oncologysafetyofdiagnostichysteroscopyinearlystageendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenyali oncologysafetyofdiagnostichysteroscopyinearlystageendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hanling oncologysafetyofdiagnostichysteroscopyinearlystageendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhengai oncologysafetyofdiagnostichysteroscopyinearlystageendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis