Cargando…

Distributions and burden of coronary calcium in asymptomatic Saudi patients referred to computed tomography

BACKGROUND: Unlike Western and Asian populations, the prevalence and severity of coronary artery calcification (CAC) have not been adequately examined in Saudi Arabia and other nearby Arab Gulf countries. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the age and gender specific percentiles of coronary calcium score (CCS)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al Helali, Sumaya, Abid Hanif, Muhamed, Alshugair, Nura, Al Majed, Ahmad, Belfageih, Abdullah, Al Qahtani, Hamad, Al Dulikan, Sameer, Hamed, Hussain, Al Mousa, Adnan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8566998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34761100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100902
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Unlike Western and Asian populations, the prevalence and severity of coronary artery calcification (CAC) have not been adequately examined in Saudi Arabia and other nearby Arab Gulf countries. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the age and gender specific percentiles of coronary calcium score (CCS) and to study the severity of CAC in relation to patient risk in a large sample of asymptomatic Saudi patients. METHODS: Retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted between July 2007 and December 2017 at a large Cardiac Centre in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The target was adult patients without pre-existing CAD referred to (64 multidetector spiral) computed tomography for standard indications. RESULTS: A total 2863 patients were included in the current analysis. The 90th percentile of CCS was 95.0 in males compared with 53.2 in females and was 823.95 in patients aged ≥ 75 years compared with zero in patients < 40 years. Extensive CAC (CCS > 400) were 3.1% in males compared with 1.6% in females and 14.0% in patients aged ≥ 75 years compared with 0.0% in patients < 40 years. CCS was steadily higher with increasing European systematic coronary risk evaluation; 3.1 ± 22.5 in mild risk, 37.1 ± 201.9 in moderate risk, 116.1 ± 256.1 in high risk, and 131.0 ± 222.0 in very high risk. CONCLUSIONS: As expected, the findings confirm the higher burden of CAC in males, older age, and higher CAD risk. The burden of CAC in current patients is much lower than reported in US and other Western patients. Local cardiologist should consider using local rather than US percentiles of CCS.