Cargando…
The effect of eye protection on SARS-CoV-2 transmission: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: The effect of eye protection to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection in the real-world remains uncertain. We aimed to synthesize all available research on the potential impact of eye protection on transmission of SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: We searched PROSPERO, PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library for...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8567128/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34736533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-021-01025-3 |
_version_ | 1784594169135628288 |
---|---|
author | Byambasuren, Oyungerel Beller, Elaine Clark, Justin Collignon, Peter Glasziou, Paul |
author_facet | Byambasuren, Oyungerel Beller, Elaine Clark, Justin Collignon, Peter Glasziou, Paul |
author_sort | Byambasuren, Oyungerel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The effect of eye protection to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection in the real-world remains uncertain. We aimed to synthesize all available research on the potential impact of eye protection on transmission of SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: We searched PROSPERO, PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library for clinical trials and comparative observational studies in CENTRAL, and Europe PMC for pre-prints. We included studies that reported sufficient data to estimate the effect of any form of eye protection including face shields and variants, goggles, and glasses, on subsequent confirmed infection with SARS-CoV-2. RESULTS: We screened 898 articles and included 6 reports of 5 observational studies from 4 countries (USA, India, Columbia, and United Kingdom) that tested face shields, goggles, and wraparound eyewear on 7567 healthcare workers. The three before-and-after and one retrospective cohort studies showed statistically significant and substantial reductions in SARS-CoV-2 infections favouring eye protection with odds ratios ranging from 0.04 to 0.6, corresponding to relative risk reductions of 96% to 40%. These reductions were not explained by changes in the community rates. However, the one case–control study reported odds ratio favouring no eye protection (OR 1.7, 95% CI 0.99, 3.0). The high heterogeneity between studies precluded any meaningful meta-analysis. None of the studies adjusted for potential confounders such as other protective behaviours, thus increasing the risk of bias, and decreasing the certainty of evidence to very low. CONCLUSIONS: Current studies suggest that eye protection may play a role in prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers. However, robust comparative trials are needed to clearly determine effectiveness of eye protections and wearability issues in both healthcare and general populations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13756-021-01025-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8567128 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85671282021-11-04 The effect of eye protection on SARS-CoV-2 transmission: a systematic review Byambasuren, Oyungerel Beller, Elaine Clark, Justin Collignon, Peter Glasziou, Paul Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Research BACKGROUND: The effect of eye protection to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection in the real-world remains uncertain. We aimed to synthesize all available research on the potential impact of eye protection on transmission of SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: We searched PROSPERO, PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library for clinical trials and comparative observational studies in CENTRAL, and Europe PMC for pre-prints. We included studies that reported sufficient data to estimate the effect of any form of eye protection including face shields and variants, goggles, and glasses, on subsequent confirmed infection with SARS-CoV-2. RESULTS: We screened 898 articles and included 6 reports of 5 observational studies from 4 countries (USA, India, Columbia, and United Kingdom) that tested face shields, goggles, and wraparound eyewear on 7567 healthcare workers. The three before-and-after and one retrospective cohort studies showed statistically significant and substantial reductions in SARS-CoV-2 infections favouring eye protection with odds ratios ranging from 0.04 to 0.6, corresponding to relative risk reductions of 96% to 40%. These reductions were not explained by changes in the community rates. However, the one case–control study reported odds ratio favouring no eye protection (OR 1.7, 95% CI 0.99, 3.0). The high heterogeneity between studies precluded any meaningful meta-analysis. None of the studies adjusted for potential confounders such as other protective behaviours, thus increasing the risk of bias, and decreasing the certainty of evidence to very low. CONCLUSIONS: Current studies suggest that eye protection may play a role in prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers. However, robust comparative trials are needed to clearly determine effectiveness of eye protections and wearability issues in both healthcare and general populations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13756-021-01025-3. BioMed Central 2021-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8567128/ /pubmed/34736533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-021-01025-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Byambasuren, Oyungerel Beller, Elaine Clark, Justin Collignon, Peter Glasziou, Paul The effect of eye protection on SARS-CoV-2 transmission: a systematic review |
title | The effect of eye protection on SARS-CoV-2 transmission: a systematic review |
title_full | The effect of eye protection on SARS-CoV-2 transmission: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | The effect of eye protection on SARS-CoV-2 transmission: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of eye protection on SARS-CoV-2 transmission: a systematic review |
title_short | The effect of eye protection on SARS-CoV-2 transmission: a systematic review |
title_sort | effect of eye protection on sars-cov-2 transmission: a systematic review |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8567128/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34736533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-021-01025-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT byambasurenoyungerel theeffectofeyeprotectiononsarscov2transmissionasystematicreview AT bellerelaine theeffectofeyeprotectiononsarscov2transmissionasystematicreview AT clarkjustin theeffectofeyeprotectiononsarscov2transmissionasystematicreview AT collignonpeter theeffectofeyeprotectiononsarscov2transmissionasystematicreview AT glaszioupaul theeffectofeyeprotectiononsarscov2transmissionasystematicreview AT byambasurenoyungerel effectofeyeprotectiononsarscov2transmissionasystematicreview AT bellerelaine effectofeyeprotectiononsarscov2transmissionasystematicreview AT clarkjustin effectofeyeprotectiononsarscov2transmissionasystematicreview AT collignonpeter effectofeyeprotectiononsarscov2transmissionasystematicreview AT glaszioupaul effectofeyeprotectiononsarscov2transmissionasystematicreview |