Cargando…

Perampanel during pregnancy: Description of four cases

Perampanel (PER) is approved in Italy as an adjunctive treatment for focal-onset seizures (FOS) and generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCs), and it could be an alternative to valproate in young women diagnosed with idiopathic generalized epilepsy. Nevertheless, clinical data about the outcome of pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alicino, A.M., Falcicchio, G., Boero, G., Santarcangelo, G., Francavilla, T., Trojano, M., La Neve, A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8567359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34761195
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebr.2021.100490
_version_ 1784594213967495168
author Alicino, A.M.
Falcicchio, G.
Boero, G.
Santarcangelo, G.
Francavilla, T.
Trojano, M.
La Neve, A.
author_facet Alicino, A.M.
Falcicchio, G.
Boero, G.
Santarcangelo, G.
Francavilla, T.
Trojano, M.
La Neve, A.
author_sort Alicino, A.M.
collection PubMed
description Perampanel (PER) is approved in Italy as an adjunctive treatment for focal-onset seizures (FOS) and generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCs), and it could be an alternative to valproate in young women diagnosed with idiopathic generalized epilepsy. Nevertheless, clinical data about the outcome of pregnancies in women exposed to PER are lacking. Here, we report retrospectively collected data from four women suffering from FOS who were exposed to PER during pregnancy. Three pregnancies were carried out with PER as add-on therapy during the entire gestation (8 mg/day in two patients and 6 mg/day in one), without seizure frequency variations. The fourth patient started PER 2 mg/day as monotherapy during the 13th week of pregnancy due to seizure relapse and continued it until delivery with complete seizure control. All pregnancies showed good outcomes, and their newborns did not possess major congenital malformations. Apgar scores and auxological parameters at birth were normal. Fetal pathology in follow-up during pregnancies was absent in all cases. In our patients PER was well tolerated and appeared safe for the fetuses and did not result in major malformations or adverse events at birth. Nevertheless, this is a report involving a small number of patients and it does not suggest the general use of PER is safe during pregnancy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8567359
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85673592021-11-09 Perampanel during pregnancy: Description of four cases Alicino, A.M. Falcicchio, G. Boero, G. Santarcangelo, G. Francavilla, T. Trojano, M. La Neve, A. Epilepsy Behav Rep Article Perampanel (PER) is approved in Italy as an adjunctive treatment for focal-onset seizures (FOS) and generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCs), and it could be an alternative to valproate in young women diagnosed with idiopathic generalized epilepsy. Nevertheless, clinical data about the outcome of pregnancies in women exposed to PER are lacking. Here, we report retrospectively collected data from four women suffering from FOS who were exposed to PER during pregnancy. Three pregnancies were carried out with PER as add-on therapy during the entire gestation (8 mg/day in two patients and 6 mg/day in one), without seizure frequency variations. The fourth patient started PER 2 mg/day as monotherapy during the 13th week of pregnancy due to seizure relapse and continued it until delivery with complete seizure control. All pregnancies showed good outcomes, and their newborns did not possess major congenital malformations. Apgar scores and auxological parameters at birth were normal. Fetal pathology in follow-up during pregnancies was absent in all cases. In our patients PER was well tolerated and appeared safe for the fetuses and did not result in major malformations or adverse events at birth. Nevertheless, this is a report involving a small number of patients and it does not suggest the general use of PER is safe during pregnancy. Elsevier 2021-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8567359/ /pubmed/34761195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebr.2021.100490 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Alicino, A.M.
Falcicchio, G.
Boero, G.
Santarcangelo, G.
Francavilla, T.
Trojano, M.
La Neve, A.
Perampanel during pregnancy: Description of four cases
title Perampanel during pregnancy: Description of four cases
title_full Perampanel during pregnancy: Description of four cases
title_fullStr Perampanel during pregnancy: Description of four cases
title_full_unstemmed Perampanel during pregnancy: Description of four cases
title_short Perampanel during pregnancy: Description of four cases
title_sort perampanel during pregnancy: description of four cases
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8567359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34761195
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebr.2021.100490
work_keys_str_mv AT alicinoam perampanelduringpregnancydescriptionoffourcases
AT falcicchiog perampanelduringpregnancydescriptionoffourcases
AT boerog perampanelduringpregnancydescriptionoffourcases
AT santarcangelog perampanelduringpregnancydescriptionoffourcases
AT francavillat perampanelduringpregnancydescriptionoffourcases
AT trojanom perampanelduringpregnancydescriptionoffourcases
AT lanevea perampanelduringpregnancydescriptionoffourcases