Cargando…
Evaluation of Flushing Ability of Cementing Flushing Fluids
[Image: see text] During cementing operation with oil-based drilling fluids, the casing and well wall are in the “oil wet” environment, and the cement slurry cannot achieve good cementation with the second interface, which seriously affects the cementation quality of the cementing interface. Therefo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2021
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8567368/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34746587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c04009 |
_version_ | 1784594216280653824 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Jingpeng Xiong, Youming Lu, Zongyu Zhang, Wei Wu, Jiwei Wei, Ruihua Li, Xiaoxiao |
author_facet | Wang, Jingpeng Xiong, Youming Lu, Zongyu Zhang, Wei Wu, Jiwei Wei, Ruihua Li, Xiaoxiao |
author_sort | Wang, Jingpeng |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] During cementing operation with oil-based drilling fluids, the casing and well wall are in the “oil wet” environment, and the cement slurry cannot achieve good cementation with the second interface, which seriously affects the cementation quality of the cementing interface. Therefore, it is very important to select a flushing fluid with good performance and high flushing efficiency for cementing operation with an oil-based drilling fluid. An integrated measurement system of interface parameters and a rotating liquid interface tension tester is selected in the room. A set of evaluation methods of wetting reversal is developed to evaluate the wetting reversal ability of type A and type-B flushing fluids on site to optimize the reasonable type and concentration of the flushing fluid. The experimental results show that under the same concentration, the surface tension and interfacial tension of type A flushing solution are lower than those of type-B; that is, the hydrophilic effect of type A flushing solution is better than that of type-B. The wettability reduction of type A is better than that of type-B. The wetting reversal ability of type A flushing solution with a surfactant concentration of 30% is better than that of type-B. The evaluation methods include surface tension, interface tension, dewetting ability, and oil washing ability of the flushing fluid, and the evaluation of the wetting reversal ability is carried out on the basis of the sandstone, sheet metal (steel for three open casings on site), and slide glass (as a reference). Then, according to the optimal concentration of the flushing fluid, a mixing experiment of the two kinds of flushing fluids is carried out to evaluate the ability of wetting reversal, and compared with the experimental results of A and B, the reasonable flushing fluid formula is finally selected. A proper analysis of the adaptability of the evaluation method of the flushing fluid is conducive to the reliable evaluation of the performance of the flushing fluid and the enhancement of the operator’s ability to grasp the cementing quality. To guide the field practice has a very important practical significance, but it also has a guiding role for the development of new pre-liquid products. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8567368 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85673682021-11-05 Evaluation of Flushing Ability of Cementing Flushing Fluids Wang, Jingpeng Xiong, Youming Lu, Zongyu Zhang, Wei Wu, Jiwei Wei, Ruihua Li, Xiaoxiao ACS Omega [Image: see text] During cementing operation with oil-based drilling fluids, the casing and well wall are in the “oil wet” environment, and the cement slurry cannot achieve good cementation with the second interface, which seriously affects the cementation quality of the cementing interface. Therefore, it is very important to select a flushing fluid with good performance and high flushing efficiency for cementing operation with an oil-based drilling fluid. An integrated measurement system of interface parameters and a rotating liquid interface tension tester is selected in the room. A set of evaluation methods of wetting reversal is developed to evaluate the wetting reversal ability of type A and type-B flushing fluids on site to optimize the reasonable type and concentration of the flushing fluid. The experimental results show that under the same concentration, the surface tension and interfacial tension of type A flushing solution are lower than those of type-B; that is, the hydrophilic effect of type A flushing solution is better than that of type-B. The wettability reduction of type A is better than that of type-B. The wetting reversal ability of type A flushing solution with a surfactant concentration of 30% is better than that of type-B. The evaluation methods include surface tension, interface tension, dewetting ability, and oil washing ability of the flushing fluid, and the evaluation of the wetting reversal ability is carried out on the basis of the sandstone, sheet metal (steel for three open casings on site), and slide glass (as a reference). Then, according to the optimal concentration of the flushing fluid, a mixing experiment of the two kinds of flushing fluids is carried out to evaluate the ability of wetting reversal, and compared with the experimental results of A and B, the reasonable flushing fluid formula is finally selected. A proper analysis of the adaptability of the evaluation method of the flushing fluid is conducive to the reliable evaluation of the performance of the flushing fluid and the enhancement of the operator’s ability to grasp the cementing quality. To guide the field practice has a very important practical significance, but it also has a guiding role for the development of new pre-liquid products. American Chemical Society 2021-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8567368/ /pubmed/34746587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c04009 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Permits non-commercial access and re-use, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained; but does not permit creation of adaptations or other derivative works (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Wang, Jingpeng Xiong, Youming Lu, Zongyu Zhang, Wei Wu, Jiwei Wei, Ruihua Li, Xiaoxiao Evaluation of Flushing Ability of Cementing Flushing Fluids |
title | Evaluation of Flushing Ability of Cementing Flushing
Fluids |
title_full | Evaluation of Flushing Ability of Cementing Flushing
Fluids |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Flushing Ability of Cementing Flushing
Fluids |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Flushing Ability of Cementing Flushing
Fluids |
title_short | Evaluation of Flushing Ability of Cementing Flushing
Fluids |
title_sort | evaluation of flushing ability of cementing flushing
fluids |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8567368/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34746587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c04009 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangjingpeng evaluationofflushingabilityofcementingflushingfluids AT xiongyouming evaluationofflushingabilityofcementingflushingfluids AT luzongyu evaluationofflushingabilityofcementingflushingfluids AT zhangwei evaluationofflushingabilityofcementingflushingfluids AT wujiwei evaluationofflushingabilityofcementingflushingfluids AT weiruihua evaluationofflushingabilityofcementingflushingfluids AT lixiaoxiao evaluationofflushingabilityofcementingflushingfluids |