Cargando…

Using individual networks to identify treatment targets for eating disorder treatment: a proof-of-concept study and initial data

BACKGROUND: Eating disorders (EDs) are severe mental illnesses, with high morbidity, mortality, and societal burden. EDs are extremely heterogenous, and only 50% of patients currently respond to first-line treatments. Personalized and effective treatments for EDs are drastically needed. METHODS: The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Levinson, Cheri A., Hunt, Rowan A., Keshishian, Ani C., Brown, Mackenzie L., Vanzhula, Irina, Christian, Caroline, Brosof, Leigh C., Williams, Brenna M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8567590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34736538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40337-021-00504-7
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Eating disorders (EDs) are severe mental illnesses, with high morbidity, mortality, and societal burden. EDs are extremely heterogenous, and only 50% of patients currently respond to first-line treatments. Personalized and effective treatments for EDs are drastically needed. METHODS: The current study (N = 34 participants with an ED diagnosis collected throughout the United States) aimed to investigate best methods informing how to select personalized treatment targets utilizing idiographic network analysis, which could then be used for evidence based personalized treatment development. We present initial data collected via experience sampling (i.e., ecological momentary assessment) over the course of 15 days, 5 times a day (75 total measurement points) that were used to select treatment targets for a personalized treatment for EDs. RESULTS: Overall, we found that treatment targets were highly variable, with less than 50% of individuals endorsing central symptoms related to weight and shape, consistent with current treatment response rates for treatments designed to target those symptoms. We also found that different aspects of selection methods (e.g., number of items, type of centrality measure) impacted treatment target selection. CONCLUSIONS: We discuss implications of these data, how to use idiographic network analysis to personalize treatment, and identify areas that need future research. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04183894. Registered 3 December 2019—Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04183894. NCT04183894 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40337-021-00504-7.