Cargando…
Incisional paresthesia following clavicle plate fixation: does it matter to patients?
BACKGROUND: Operative management of clavicle fractures is increasingly common. In the context of explaining the risks and benefits of surgery, understanding the impact of incisional numbness as it relates to the patient experience is key to shared decision making. This study aims to determine the pr...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8567600/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34732198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04770-z |
_version_ | 1784594269674143744 |
---|---|
author | Lemieux, Valérie Afsharpour, Soheil Nam, Diane Elmaraghy, Amr |
author_facet | Lemieux, Valérie Afsharpour, Soheil Nam, Diane Elmaraghy, Amr |
author_sort | Lemieux, Valérie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Operative management of clavicle fractures is increasingly common. In the context of explaining the risks and benefits of surgery, understanding the impact of incisional numbness as it relates to the patient experience is key to shared decision making. This study aims to determine the prevalence, extent, and recovery of sensory changes associated with supraclavicular nerve injury after open reduction and plate internal fixation of middle or lateral clavicle shaft fractures. METHODS: Eighty-six patients were identified retrospectively and completed a patient experience survey assessing sensory symptoms, perceived post-operative function, and satisfaction. Correlations between demographic factors and outcomes, as well as subgroup analyses were completed to identify factors impacting patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Ninety percent of patients experienced sensory changes post-operatively. Numbness was the most common symptom (64%) and complete resolution occurred in 32% of patients over an average of 19 months. Patients who experienced burning were less satisfied overall with the outcome of their surgery whereas those who were informed of the risk of sensory changes pre-operatively were more satisfied overall. CONCLUSIONS: Post-operative sensory disturbance is common. While most patients improve, some symptoms persist in the majority of patients without significant negative effects on satisfaction. Patients should always be advised of the risk of persistent sensory alterations around the surgical site to increase the likelihood of their satisfaction post-operatively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04770-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8567600 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85676002021-11-04 Incisional paresthesia following clavicle plate fixation: does it matter to patients? Lemieux, Valérie Afsharpour, Soheil Nam, Diane Elmaraghy, Amr BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: Operative management of clavicle fractures is increasingly common. In the context of explaining the risks and benefits of surgery, understanding the impact of incisional numbness as it relates to the patient experience is key to shared decision making. This study aims to determine the prevalence, extent, and recovery of sensory changes associated with supraclavicular nerve injury after open reduction and plate internal fixation of middle or lateral clavicle shaft fractures. METHODS: Eighty-six patients were identified retrospectively and completed a patient experience survey assessing sensory symptoms, perceived post-operative function, and satisfaction. Correlations between demographic factors and outcomes, as well as subgroup analyses were completed to identify factors impacting patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Ninety percent of patients experienced sensory changes post-operatively. Numbness was the most common symptom (64%) and complete resolution occurred in 32% of patients over an average of 19 months. Patients who experienced burning were less satisfied overall with the outcome of their surgery whereas those who were informed of the risk of sensory changes pre-operatively were more satisfied overall. CONCLUSIONS: Post-operative sensory disturbance is common. While most patients improve, some symptoms persist in the majority of patients without significant negative effects on satisfaction. Patients should always be advised of the risk of persistent sensory alterations around the surgical site to increase the likelihood of their satisfaction post-operatively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04770-z. BioMed Central 2021-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8567600/ /pubmed/34732198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04770-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Lemieux, Valérie Afsharpour, Soheil Nam, Diane Elmaraghy, Amr Incisional paresthesia following clavicle plate fixation: does it matter to patients? |
title | Incisional paresthesia following clavicle plate fixation: does it matter to patients? |
title_full | Incisional paresthesia following clavicle plate fixation: does it matter to patients? |
title_fullStr | Incisional paresthesia following clavicle plate fixation: does it matter to patients? |
title_full_unstemmed | Incisional paresthesia following clavicle plate fixation: does it matter to patients? |
title_short | Incisional paresthesia following clavicle plate fixation: does it matter to patients? |
title_sort | incisional paresthesia following clavicle plate fixation: does it matter to patients? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8567600/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34732198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04770-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lemieuxvalerie incisionalparesthesiafollowingclavicleplatefixationdoesitmattertopatients AT afsharpoursoheil incisionalparesthesiafollowingclavicleplatefixationdoesitmattertopatients AT namdiane incisionalparesthesiafollowingclavicleplatefixationdoesitmattertopatients AT elmaraghyamr incisionalparesthesiafollowingclavicleplatefixationdoesitmattertopatients |