Cargando…

Incisional paresthesia following clavicle plate fixation: does it matter to patients?

BACKGROUND: Operative management of clavicle fractures is increasingly common. In the context of explaining the risks and benefits of surgery, understanding the impact of incisional numbness as it relates to the patient experience is key to shared decision making. This study aims to determine the pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lemieux, Valérie, Afsharpour, Soheil, Nam, Diane, Elmaraghy, Amr
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8567600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34732198
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04770-z
_version_ 1784594269674143744
author Lemieux, Valérie
Afsharpour, Soheil
Nam, Diane
Elmaraghy, Amr
author_facet Lemieux, Valérie
Afsharpour, Soheil
Nam, Diane
Elmaraghy, Amr
author_sort Lemieux, Valérie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Operative management of clavicle fractures is increasingly common. In the context of explaining the risks and benefits of surgery, understanding the impact of incisional numbness as it relates to the patient experience is key to shared decision making. This study aims to determine the prevalence, extent, and recovery of sensory changes associated with supraclavicular nerve injury after open reduction and plate internal fixation of middle or lateral clavicle shaft fractures. METHODS: Eighty-six patients were identified retrospectively and completed a patient experience survey assessing sensory symptoms, perceived post-operative function, and satisfaction. Correlations between demographic factors and outcomes, as well as subgroup analyses were completed to identify factors impacting patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Ninety percent of patients experienced sensory changes post-operatively. Numbness was the most common symptom (64%) and complete resolution occurred in 32% of patients over an average of 19 months. Patients who experienced burning were less satisfied overall with the outcome of their surgery whereas those who were informed of the risk of sensory changes pre-operatively were more satisfied overall. CONCLUSIONS: Post-operative sensory disturbance is common. While most patients improve, some symptoms persist in the majority of patients without significant negative effects on satisfaction. Patients should always be advised of the risk of persistent sensory alterations around the surgical site to increase the likelihood of their satisfaction post-operatively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04770-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8567600
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85676002021-11-04 Incisional paresthesia following clavicle plate fixation: does it matter to patients? Lemieux, Valérie Afsharpour, Soheil Nam, Diane Elmaraghy, Amr BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: Operative management of clavicle fractures is increasingly common. In the context of explaining the risks and benefits of surgery, understanding the impact of incisional numbness as it relates to the patient experience is key to shared decision making. This study aims to determine the prevalence, extent, and recovery of sensory changes associated with supraclavicular nerve injury after open reduction and plate internal fixation of middle or lateral clavicle shaft fractures. METHODS: Eighty-six patients were identified retrospectively and completed a patient experience survey assessing sensory symptoms, perceived post-operative function, and satisfaction. Correlations between demographic factors and outcomes, as well as subgroup analyses were completed to identify factors impacting patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Ninety percent of patients experienced sensory changes post-operatively. Numbness was the most common symptom (64%) and complete resolution occurred in 32% of patients over an average of 19 months. Patients who experienced burning were less satisfied overall with the outcome of their surgery whereas those who were informed of the risk of sensory changes pre-operatively were more satisfied overall. CONCLUSIONS: Post-operative sensory disturbance is common. While most patients improve, some symptoms persist in the majority of patients without significant negative effects on satisfaction. Patients should always be advised of the risk of persistent sensory alterations around the surgical site to increase the likelihood of their satisfaction post-operatively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04770-z. BioMed Central 2021-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8567600/ /pubmed/34732198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04770-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Lemieux, Valérie
Afsharpour, Soheil
Nam, Diane
Elmaraghy, Amr
Incisional paresthesia following clavicle plate fixation: does it matter to patients?
title Incisional paresthesia following clavicle plate fixation: does it matter to patients?
title_full Incisional paresthesia following clavicle plate fixation: does it matter to patients?
title_fullStr Incisional paresthesia following clavicle plate fixation: does it matter to patients?
title_full_unstemmed Incisional paresthesia following clavicle plate fixation: does it matter to patients?
title_short Incisional paresthesia following clavicle plate fixation: does it matter to patients?
title_sort incisional paresthesia following clavicle plate fixation: does it matter to patients?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8567600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34732198
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04770-z
work_keys_str_mv AT lemieuxvalerie incisionalparesthesiafollowingclavicleplatefixationdoesitmattertopatients
AT afsharpoursoheil incisionalparesthesiafollowingclavicleplatefixationdoesitmattertopatients
AT namdiane incisionalparesthesiafollowingclavicleplatefixationdoesitmattertopatients
AT elmaraghyamr incisionalparesthesiafollowingclavicleplatefixationdoesitmattertopatients