Cargando…
Policy Evaluation Network (PEN): Protocol for systematic literature reviews examining the evidence for impact of policies on physical activity across seven different policy domains
Introduction: Over 40 million deaths annually are due to noncommunicable diseases, 15 million of these are premature deaths and physical inactivity contributes an estimated 9% to this figure. Global responses have included the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the Global Action Plan on Physic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
F1000 Research Limited
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8567685/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34805740 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13089.4 |
_version_ | 1784594285604110336 |
---|---|
author | Volf, Kevin Kelly, Liam García Bengoechea, Enrique Casey, Bláthín Gobis, Anna Lakerveld, Jeroen Zukowska, Joanna Gelius, Peter Messing, Sven Forberger, Sarah Woods, Catherine |
author_facet | Volf, Kevin Kelly, Liam García Bengoechea, Enrique Casey, Bláthín Gobis, Anna Lakerveld, Jeroen Zukowska, Joanna Gelius, Peter Messing, Sven Forberger, Sarah Woods, Catherine |
author_sort | Volf, Kevin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: Over 40 million deaths annually are due to noncommunicable diseases, 15 million of these are premature deaths and physical inactivity contributes an estimated 9% to this figure. Global responses have included the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the Global Action Plan on Physical Activity (GAPPA). Both point to policy action on physical activity (PA) to address change, yet the impact of policy on PA outcomes is unknown. The protocol described outlines the methodology for systematic literature reviews that will be undertaken by the Policy Evaluation Network (PEN) to address this knowledge gap. Methods: The seven best investments for promotion of population PA identified in the Toronto Charter highlighted seven policy domains (schools, transport, urban design, primary health care systems, public education, community-wide programmes and sport) which will form the basis of these PEN reviews. Seven individual scientific literature searches across six electronic databases will be conducted. Each will use the key concepts of policy, PA, evaluation and a distinct concept for each of the seven policy domains. This will be supplemented with a search of the reference list of included articles. Methodological quality will be assessed and overall effectiveness for each included study will be described according to pre-determined criteria. Conclusions: Each review will provide policy makers with a list of policy statements and corresponding actions which the evidence has determined impact on PA directly or indirectly. By collating the evidence, and demonstrating the depth of the science base which informs these policy recommendations, each review will provide guidance to policymakers to use evidence-based or evidence-informed policies to achieve the 15% relative reduction in physical inactivity as defined by GAPPA. Registration: PROSPERO CRD42020156630 (10/07/2020). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8567685 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | F1000 Research Limited |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85676852021-11-18 Policy Evaluation Network (PEN): Protocol for systematic literature reviews examining the evidence for impact of policies on physical activity across seven different policy domains Volf, Kevin Kelly, Liam García Bengoechea, Enrique Casey, Bláthín Gobis, Anna Lakerveld, Jeroen Zukowska, Joanna Gelius, Peter Messing, Sven Forberger, Sarah Woods, Catherine HRB Open Res Study Protocol Introduction: Over 40 million deaths annually are due to noncommunicable diseases, 15 million of these are premature deaths and physical inactivity contributes an estimated 9% to this figure. Global responses have included the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the Global Action Plan on Physical Activity (GAPPA). Both point to policy action on physical activity (PA) to address change, yet the impact of policy on PA outcomes is unknown. The protocol described outlines the methodology for systematic literature reviews that will be undertaken by the Policy Evaluation Network (PEN) to address this knowledge gap. Methods: The seven best investments for promotion of population PA identified in the Toronto Charter highlighted seven policy domains (schools, transport, urban design, primary health care systems, public education, community-wide programmes and sport) which will form the basis of these PEN reviews. Seven individual scientific literature searches across six electronic databases will be conducted. Each will use the key concepts of policy, PA, evaluation and a distinct concept for each of the seven policy domains. This will be supplemented with a search of the reference list of included articles. Methodological quality will be assessed and overall effectiveness for each included study will be described according to pre-determined criteria. Conclusions: Each review will provide policy makers with a list of policy statements and corresponding actions which the evidence has determined impact on PA directly or indirectly. By collating the evidence, and demonstrating the depth of the science base which informs these policy recommendations, each review will provide guidance to policymakers to use evidence-based or evidence-informed policies to achieve the 15% relative reduction in physical inactivity as defined by GAPPA. Registration: PROSPERO CRD42020156630 (10/07/2020). F1000 Research Limited 2022-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8567685/ /pubmed/34805740 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13089.4 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Volf K et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Volf, Kevin Kelly, Liam García Bengoechea, Enrique Casey, Bláthín Gobis, Anna Lakerveld, Jeroen Zukowska, Joanna Gelius, Peter Messing, Sven Forberger, Sarah Woods, Catherine Policy Evaluation Network (PEN): Protocol for systematic literature reviews examining the evidence for impact of policies on physical activity across seven different policy domains |
title | Policy Evaluation Network (PEN): Protocol for systematic literature reviews examining the evidence for impact of policies on physical activity across seven different policy domains |
title_full | Policy Evaluation Network (PEN): Protocol for systematic literature reviews examining the evidence for impact of policies on physical activity across seven different policy domains |
title_fullStr | Policy Evaluation Network (PEN): Protocol for systematic literature reviews examining the evidence for impact of policies on physical activity across seven different policy domains |
title_full_unstemmed | Policy Evaluation Network (PEN): Protocol for systematic literature reviews examining the evidence for impact of policies on physical activity across seven different policy domains |
title_short | Policy Evaluation Network (PEN): Protocol for systematic literature reviews examining the evidence for impact of policies on physical activity across seven different policy domains |
title_sort | policy evaluation network (pen): protocol for systematic literature reviews examining the evidence for impact of policies on physical activity across seven different policy domains |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8567685/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34805740 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13089.4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT volfkevin policyevaluationnetworkpenprotocolforsystematicliteraturereviewsexaminingtheevidenceforimpactofpoliciesonphysicalactivityacrosssevendifferentpolicydomains AT kellyliam policyevaluationnetworkpenprotocolforsystematicliteraturereviewsexaminingtheevidenceforimpactofpoliciesonphysicalactivityacrosssevendifferentpolicydomains AT garciabengoecheaenrique policyevaluationnetworkpenprotocolforsystematicliteraturereviewsexaminingtheevidenceforimpactofpoliciesonphysicalactivityacrosssevendifferentpolicydomains AT caseyblathin policyevaluationnetworkpenprotocolforsystematicliteraturereviewsexaminingtheevidenceforimpactofpoliciesonphysicalactivityacrosssevendifferentpolicydomains AT gobisanna policyevaluationnetworkpenprotocolforsystematicliteraturereviewsexaminingtheevidenceforimpactofpoliciesonphysicalactivityacrosssevendifferentpolicydomains AT lakerveldjeroen policyevaluationnetworkpenprotocolforsystematicliteraturereviewsexaminingtheevidenceforimpactofpoliciesonphysicalactivityacrosssevendifferentpolicydomains AT zukowskajoanna policyevaluationnetworkpenprotocolforsystematicliteraturereviewsexaminingtheevidenceforimpactofpoliciesonphysicalactivityacrosssevendifferentpolicydomains AT geliuspeter policyevaluationnetworkpenprotocolforsystematicliteraturereviewsexaminingtheevidenceforimpactofpoliciesonphysicalactivityacrosssevendifferentpolicydomains AT messingsven policyevaluationnetworkpenprotocolforsystematicliteraturereviewsexaminingtheevidenceforimpactofpoliciesonphysicalactivityacrosssevendifferentpolicydomains AT forbergersarah policyevaluationnetworkpenprotocolforsystematicliteraturereviewsexaminingtheevidenceforimpactofpoliciesonphysicalactivityacrosssevendifferentpolicydomains AT woodscatherine policyevaluationnetworkpenprotocolforsystematicliteraturereviewsexaminingtheevidenceforimpactofpoliciesonphysicalactivityacrosssevendifferentpolicydomains AT policyevaluationnetworkpenprotocolforsystematicliteraturereviewsexaminingtheevidenceforimpactofpoliciesonphysicalactivityacrosssevendifferentpolicydomains |