Cargando…

Policy Evaluation Network (PEN): Protocol for systematic literature reviews examining the evidence for impact of policies on physical activity across seven different policy domains

Introduction: Over 40 million deaths annually are due to noncommunicable diseases, 15 million of these are premature deaths and physical inactivity contributes an estimated 9% to this figure. Global responses have included the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the Global Action Plan on Physic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Volf, Kevin, Kelly, Liam, García Bengoechea, Enrique, Casey, Bláthín, Gobis, Anna, Lakerveld, Jeroen, Zukowska, Joanna, Gelius, Peter, Messing, Sven, Forberger, Sarah, Woods, Catherine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8567685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34805740
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13089.4
_version_ 1784594285604110336
author Volf, Kevin
Kelly, Liam
García Bengoechea, Enrique
Casey, Bláthín
Gobis, Anna
Lakerveld, Jeroen
Zukowska, Joanna
Gelius, Peter
Messing, Sven
Forberger, Sarah
Woods, Catherine
author_facet Volf, Kevin
Kelly, Liam
García Bengoechea, Enrique
Casey, Bláthín
Gobis, Anna
Lakerveld, Jeroen
Zukowska, Joanna
Gelius, Peter
Messing, Sven
Forberger, Sarah
Woods, Catherine
author_sort Volf, Kevin
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Over 40 million deaths annually are due to noncommunicable diseases, 15 million of these are premature deaths and physical inactivity contributes an estimated 9% to this figure. Global responses have included the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the Global Action Plan on Physical Activity (GAPPA). Both point to policy action on physical activity (PA) to address change, yet the impact of policy on PA outcomes is unknown.  The protocol described outlines the methodology for systematic literature reviews that will be undertaken by the Policy Evaluation Network (PEN) to address this knowledge gap. Methods: The seven best investments for promotion of population PA identified in the Toronto Charter highlighted seven policy domains (schools, transport, urban design, primary health care systems, public education, community-wide programmes and sport) which will form the basis of these PEN reviews. Seven individual scientific literature searches across six electronic databases will be conducted. Each will use the key concepts of policy, PA, evaluation and a distinct concept for each of the seven policy domains. This will be supplemented with a search of the reference list of included articles. Methodological quality will be assessed and overall effectiveness for each included study will be described according to pre-determined criteria. Conclusions: Each review will provide policy makers with a list of policy statements and corresponding actions which the evidence has determined impact on PA directly or indirectly. By collating the evidence, and demonstrating the depth of the science base which informs these policy recommendations, each review will provide guidance to policymakers to use evidence-based or evidence-informed policies to achieve the 15% relative reduction in physical inactivity as defined by GAPPA. Registration:  PROSPERO CRD42020156630 (10/07/2020).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8567685
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85676852021-11-18 Policy Evaluation Network (PEN): Protocol for systematic literature reviews examining the evidence for impact of policies on physical activity across seven different policy domains Volf, Kevin Kelly, Liam García Bengoechea, Enrique Casey, Bláthín Gobis, Anna Lakerveld, Jeroen Zukowska, Joanna Gelius, Peter Messing, Sven Forberger, Sarah Woods, Catherine HRB Open Res Study Protocol Introduction: Over 40 million deaths annually are due to noncommunicable diseases, 15 million of these are premature deaths and physical inactivity contributes an estimated 9% to this figure. Global responses have included the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the Global Action Plan on Physical Activity (GAPPA). Both point to policy action on physical activity (PA) to address change, yet the impact of policy on PA outcomes is unknown.  The protocol described outlines the methodology for systematic literature reviews that will be undertaken by the Policy Evaluation Network (PEN) to address this knowledge gap. Methods: The seven best investments for promotion of population PA identified in the Toronto Charter highlighted seven policy domains (schools, transport, urban design, primary health care systems, public education, community-wide programmes and sport) which will form the basis of these PEN reviews. Seven individual scientific literature searches across six electronic databases will be conducted. Each will use the key concepts of policy, PA, evaluation and a distinct concept for each of the seven policy domains. This will be supplemented with a search of the reference list of included articles. Methodological quality will be assessed and overall effectiveness for each included study will be described according to pre-determined criteria. Conclusions: Each review will provide policy makers with a list of policy statements and corresponding actions which the evidence has determined impact on PA directly or indirectly. By collating the evidence, and demonstrating the depth of the science base which informs these policy recommendations, each review will provide guidance to policymakers to use evidence-based or evidence-informed policies to achieve the 15% relative reduction in physical inactivity as defined by GAPPA. Registration:  PROSPERO CRD42020156630 (10/07/2020). F1000 Research Limited 2022-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8567685/ /pubmed/34805740 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13089.4 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Volf K et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Volf, Kevin
Kelly, Liam
García Bengoechea, Enrique
Casey, Bláthín
Gobis, Anna
Lakerveld, Jeroen
Zukowska, Joanna
Gelius, Peter
Messing, Sven
Forberger, Sarah
Woods, Catherine
Policy Evaluation Network (PEN): Protocol for systematic literature reviews examining the evidence for impact of policies on physical activity across seven different policy domains
title Policy Evaluation Network (PEN): Protocol for systematic literature reviews examining the evidence for impact of policies on physical activity across seven different policy domains
title_full Policy Evaluation Network (PEN): Protocol for systematic literature reviews examining the evidence for impact of policies on physical activity across seven different policy domains
title_fullStr Policy Evaluation Network (PEN): Protocol for systematic literature reviews examining the evidence for impact of policies on physical activity across seven different policy domains
title_full_unstemmed Policy Evaluation Network (PEN): Protocol for systematic literature reviews examining the evidence for impact of policies on physical activity across seven different policy domains
title_short Policy Evaluation Network (PEN): Protocol for systematic literature reviews examining the evidence for impact of policies on physical activity across seven different policy domains
title_sort policy evaluation network (pen): protocol for systematic literature reviews examining the evidence for impact of policies on physical activity across seven different policy domains
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8567685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34805740
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13089.4
work_keys_str_mv AT volfkevin policyevaluationnetworkpenprotocolforsystematicliteraturereviewsexaminingtheevidenceforimpactofpoliciesonphysicalactivityacrosssevendifferentpolicydomains
AT kellyliam policyevaluationnetworkpenprotocolforsystematicliteraturereviewsexaminingtheevidenceforimpactofpoliciesonphysicalactivityacrosssevendifferentpolicydomains
AT garciabengoecheaenrique policyevaluationnetworkpenprotocolforsystematicliteraturereviewsexaminingtheevidenceforimpactofpoliciesonphysicalactivityacrosssevendifferentpolicydomains
AT caseyblathin policyevaluationnetworkpenprotocolforsystematicliteraturereviewsexaminingtheevidenceforimpactofpoliciesonphysicalactivityacrosssevendifferentpolicydomains
AT gobisanna policyevaluationnetworkpenprotocolforsystematicliteraturereviewsexaminingtheevidenceforimpactofpoliciesonphysicalactivityacrosssevendifferentpolicydomains
AT lakerveldjeroen policyevaluationnetworkpenprotocolforsystematicliteraturereviewsexaminingtheevidenceforimpactofpoliciesonphysicalactivityacrosssevendifferentpolicydomains
AT zukowskajoanna policyevaluationnetworkpenprotocolforsystematicliteraturereviewsexaminingtheevidenceforimpactofpoliciesonphysicalactivityacrosssevendifferentpolicydomains
AT geliuspeter policyevaluationnetworkpenprotocolforsystematicliteraturereviewsexaminingtheevidenceforimpactofpoliciesonphysicalactivityacrosssevendifferentpolicydomains
AT messingsven policyevaluationnetworkpenprotocolforsystematicliteraturereviewsexaminingtheevidenceforimpactofpoliciesonphysicalactivityacrosssevendifferentpolicydomains
AT forbergersarah policyevaluationnetworkpenprotocolforsystematicliteraturereviewsexaminingtheevidenceforimpactofpoliciesonphysicalactivityacrosssevendifferentpolicydomains
AT woodscatherine policyevaluationnetworkpenprotocolforsystematicliteraturereviewsexaminingtheevidenceforimpactofpoliciesonphysicalactivityacrosssevendifferentpolicydomains
AT policyevaluationnetworkpenprotocolforsystematicliteraturereviewsexaminingtheevidenceforimpactofpoliciesonphysicalactivityacrosssevendifferentpolicydomains