Cargando…
Network alignment and similarity reveal atlas-based topological differences in structural connectomes
The interactions between different brain regions can be modeled as a graph, called connectome, whose nodes correspond to parcels from a predefined brain atlas. The edges of the graph encode the strength of the axonal connectivity between regions of the atlas that can be estimated via diffusion magne...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MIT Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8567827/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34746624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/netn_a_00199 |
_version_ | 1784594304453312512 |
---|---|
author | Frigo, Matteo Cruciani, Emilio Coudert, David Deriche, Rachid Natale, Emanuele Deslauriers-Gauthier, Samuel |
author_facet | Frigo, Matteo Cruciani, Emilio Coudert, David Deriche, Rachid Natale, Emanuele Deslauriers-Gauthier, Samuel |
author_sort | Frigo, Matteo |
collection | PubMed |
description | The interactions between different brain regions can be modeled as a graph, called connectome, whose nodes correspond to parcels from a predefined brain atlas. The edges of the graph encode the strength of the axonal connectivity between regions of the atlas that can be estimated via diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) tractography. Herein, we aim to provide a novel perspective on the problem of choosing a suitable atlas for structural connectivity studies by assessing how robustly an atlas captures the network topology across different subjects in a homogeneous cohort. We measure this robustness by assessing the alignability of the connectomes, namely the possibility to retrieve graph matchings that provide highly similar graphs. We introduce two novel concepts. First, the graph Jaccard index (GJI), a graph similarity measure based on the well-established Jaccard index between sets; the GJI exhibits natural mathematical properties that are not satisfied by previous approaches. Second, we devise WL-align, a new technique for aligning connectomes obtained by adapting the Weisfeiler-Leman (WL) graph-isomorphism test. We validated the GJI and WL-align on data from the Human Connectome Project database, inferring a strategy for choosing a suitable parcellation for structural connectivity studies. Code and data are publicly available. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8567827 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MIT Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85678272021-11-05 Network alignment and similarity reveal atlas-based topological differences in structural connectomes Frigo, Matteo Cruciani, Emilio Coudert, David Deriche, Rachid Natale, Emanuele Deslauriers-Gauthier, Samuel Netw Neurosci Research Article The interactions between different brain regions can be modeled as a graph, called connectome, whose nodes correspond to parcels from a predefined brain atlas. The edges of the graph encode the strength of the axonal connectivity between regions of the atlas that can be estimated via diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) tractography. Herein, we aim to provide a novel perspective on the problem of choosing a suitable atlas for structural connectivity studies by assessing how robustly an atlas captures the network topology across different subjects in a homogeneous cohort. We measure this robustness by assessing the alignability of the connectomes, namely the possibility to retrieve graph matchings that provide highly similar graphs. We introduce two novel concepts. First, the graph Jaccard index (GJI), a graph similarity measure based on the well-established Jaccard index between sets; the GJI exhibits natural mathematical properties that are not satisfied by previous approaches. Second, we devise WL-align, a new technique for aligning connectomes obtained by adapting the Weisfeiler-Leman (WL) graph-isomorphism test. We validated the GJI and WL-align on data from the Human Connectome Project database, inferring a strategy for choosing a suitable parcellation for structural connectivity studies. Code and data are publicly available. MIT Press 2021-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8567827/ /pubmed/34746624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/netn_a_00199 Text en © 2021 Massachusetts Institute of Technology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For a full description of the license, please visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Frigo, Matteo Cruciani, Emilio Coudert, David Deriche, Rachid Natale, Emanuele Deslauriers-Gauthier, Samuel Network alignment and similarity reveal atlas-based topological differences in structural connectomes |
title | Network alignment and similarity reveal atlas-based topological differences in structural connectomes |
title_full | Network alignment and similarity reveal atlas-based topological differences in structural connectomes |
title_fullStr | Network alignment and similarity reveal atlas-based topological differences in structural connectomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Network alignment and similarity reveal atlas-based topological differences in structural connectomes |
title_short | Network alignment and similarity reveal atlas-based topological differences in structural connectomes |
title_sort | network alignment and similarity reveal atlas-based topological differences in structural connectomes |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8567827/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34746624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/netn_a_00199 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT frigomatteo networkalignmentandsimilarityrevealatlasbasedtopologicaldifferencesinstructuralconnectomes AT crucianiemilio networkalignmentandsimilarityrevealatlasbasedtopologicaldifferencesinstructuralconnectomes AT coudertdavid networkalignmentandsimilarityrevealatlasbasedtopologicaldifferencesinstructuralconnectomes AT dericherachid networkalignmentandsimilarityrevealatlasbasedtopologicaldifferencesinstructuralconnectomes AT nataleemanuele networkalignmentandsimilarityrevealatlasbasedtopologicaldifferencesinstructuralconnectomes AT deslauriersgauthiersamuel networkalignmentandsimilarityrevealatlasbasedtopologicaldifferencesinstructuralconnectomes |