Cargando…
Toward an information theoretical description of communication in brain networks
Modeling communication dynamics in the brain is a key challenge in network neuroscience. We present here a framework that combines two measurements for any system where different communication processes are taking place on top of a fixed structural topology: path processing score (PPS) estimates how...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MIT Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8567835/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34746621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/netn_a_00185 |
_version_ | 1784594306397372416 |
---|---|
author | Amico, Enrico Abbas, Kausar Duong-Tran, Duy Anh Tipnis, Uttara Rajapandian, Meenusree Chumin, Evgeny Ventresca, Mario Harezlak, Jaroslaw Goñi, Joaquín |
author_facet | Amico, Enrico Abbas, Kausar Duong-Tran, Duy Anh Tipnis, Uttara Rajapandian, Meenusree Chumin, Evgeny Ventresca, Mario Harezlak, Jaroslaw Goñi, Joaquín |
author_sort | Amico, Enrico |
collection | PubMed |
description | Modeling communication dynamics in the brain is a key challenge in network neuroscience. We present here a framework that combines two measurements for any system where different communication processes are taking place on top of a fixed structural topology: path processing score (PPS) estimates how much the brain signal has changed or has been transformed between any two brain regions (source and target); path broadcasting strength (PBS) estimates the propagation of the signal through edges adjacent to the path being assessed. We use PPS and PBS to explore communication dynamics in large-scale brain networks. We show that brain communication dynamics can be divided into three main “communication regimes” of information transfer: absent communication (no communication happening); relay communication (information is being transferred almost intact); and transducted communication (the information is being transformed). We use PBS to categorize brain regions based on the way they broadcast information. Subcortical regions are mainly direct broadcasters to multiple receivers; Temporal and frontal nodes mainly operate as broadcast relay brain stations; visual and somatomotor cortices act as multichannel transducted broadcasters. This work paves the way toward the field of brain network information theory by providing a principled methodology to explore communication dynamics in large-scale brain networks. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8567835 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MIT Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85678352021-11-05 Toward an information theoretical description of communication in brain networks Amico, Enrico Abbas, Kausar Duong-Tran, Duy Anh Tipnis, Uttara Rajapandian, Meenusree Chumin, Evgeny Ventresca, Mario Harezlak, Jaroslaw Goñi, Joaquín Netw Neurosci Methods Modeling communication dynamics in the brain is a key challenge in network neuroscience. We present here a framework that combines two measurements for any system where different communication processes are taking place on top of a fixed structural topology: path processing score (PPS) estimates how much the brain signal has changed or has been transformed between any two brain regions (source and target); path broadcasting strength (PBS) estimates the propagation of the signal through edges adjacent to the path being assessed. We use PPS and PBS to explore communication dynamics in large-scale brain networks. We show that brain communication dynamics can be divided into three main “communication regimes” of information transfer: absent communication (no communication happening); relay communication (information is being transferred almost intact); and transducted communication (the information is being transformed). We use PBS to categorize brain regions based on the way they broadcast information. Subcortical regions are mainly direct broadcasters to multiple receivers; Temporal and frontal nodes mainly operate as broadcast relay brain stations; visual and somatomotor cortices act as multichannel transducted broadcasters. This work paves the way toward the field of brain network information theory by providing a principled methodology to explore communication dynamics in large-scale brain networks. MIT Press 2021-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8567835/ /pubmed/34746621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/netn_a_00185 Text en © 2021 Massachusetts Institute of Technology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For a full description of the license, please visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Methods Amico, Enrico Abbas, Kausar Duong-Tran, Duy Anh Tipnis, Uttara Rajapandian, Meenusree Chumin, Evgeny Ventresca, Mario Harezlak, Jaroslaw Goñi, Joaquín Toward an information theoretical description of communication in brain networks |
title | Toward an information theoretical description of communication in brain networks |
title_full | Toward an information theoretical description of communication in brain networks |
title_fullStr | Toward an information theoretical description of communication in brain networks |
title_full_unstemmed | Toward an information theoretical description of communication in brain networks |
title_short | Toward an information theoretical description of communication in brain networks |
title_sort | toward an information theoretical description of communication in brain networks |
topic | Methods |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8567835/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34746621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/netn_a_00185 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT amicoenrico towardaninformationtheoreticaldescriptionofcommunicationinbrainnetworks AT abbaskausar towardaninformationtheoreticaldescriptionofcommunicationinbrainnetworks AT duongtranduyanh towardaninformationtheoreticaldescriptionofcommunicationinbrainnetworks AT tipnisuttara towardaninformationtheoreticaldescriptionofcommunicationinbrainnetworks AT rajapandianmeenusree towardaninformationtheoreticaldescriptionofcommunicationinbrainnetworks AT chuminevgeny towardaninformationtheoreticaldescriptionofcommunicationinbrainnetworks AT ventrescamario towardaninformationtheoreticaldescriptionofcommunicationinbrainnetworks AT harezlakjaroslaw towardaninformationtheoreticaldescriptionofcommunicationinbrainnetworks AT gonijoaquin towardaninformationtheoreticaldescriptionofcommunicationinbrainnetworks |